The Corner

Politics & Policy

Why Some Republicans Voted against the ‘Anti-Hate’ Resolution 

Rep. Ilhan Omar participates in a news conference in Washington, D.C., February 7, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Has the controversy surrounding Democratic congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic comments actually turned into an embarrassing scandal for Republicans? In some quarters of the media, the answer to that question is a resounding “yes.”

That bit of conventional wisdom began to congeal as soon as the House passed an “anti-hate” resolution Thursday night. The resolution didn’t mention Omar by name and broadly condemned many types of bigotry — anti-Semitism as well as Islamophobia and white-supremacist persecution of “African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other people of color, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and others.” Some House Democrats like Ted Deutch of Florida and Eliot Engel of New York joined Republicans in disagreeing with House Democratic leaders who, under internal pressure, turned the resolution into a broad condemnation of almost all forms of bigotry rather than a resolution solely focused on anti-Semitism.

But in the end, every Democrat voted for the measure, while 23 Republicans voted against it. And that was the real story of the day, according to some.

“House Democrats have been under pressure for a week on anti-semitism but House Republicans have bailed them out,”  tweeted Politico’s Jake Sherman. “An embarrassing moment for house gop.”

“This is going to be hard to explain,”  tweeted  Michael Barbaro of the New York Times.

Jennifer Rubin of the  Washington Post wrote in an article that Republicans like Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Lee Zeldin of New York, who voted against the measure, had “snatched back the mantle of racial and religious insensitivity, announcing to the world that they couldn’t possibly be against both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.”

What’s odd, or perhaps  not so odd, is that Rubin doesn’t include a single quotation from any Republican explaining why he or she voted against the measure.

Here’s how Cheney explained her vote in a statement:

Today’s resolution vote was a sham put forward by Democrats to avoid condemning one of their own and denouncing vile anti-Semitism.

While I stand whole heartedly against discrimination outlined in this resolution, the language before the House today did not address the issue that is front and center.

Rep. Omar’s comments were wrong and she has proven multiple times that she embodies a vile, hate-filled, anti-Semitic, anti-Israel bigotry. She deserves to be rebuked, by name, and removed from the House Foreign Affairs Committee so that there is no mistake about the values and priorities that the House stands for.

For Democratic leadership to kowtow to their radical members and refuse to offer legislative language that criticizes Rep. Omar’s statements in the strongest possible manner confirms what we already knew: that their party is controlled by far-left extremists who can’t even muster the courage to stand up to blatant anti-Semitism.

This is a sad day for the House and Democrats’ lack of action is fully responsible for bringing us to this unfortunate moment.

Lee Zeldin made many of the same points in a floor speech. He also noted that, following Iowa Republican Steve King’s comments about white nationalism in January, Republicans stripped King of his committee assignments, and the whole House passed a resolution naming King and specifically condemning white nationalism. At the time, Cheney said King should resign from Congress.

You might still disagree with how Zeldin and Cheney voted, but after reading and listening to their explanations it’s hard to see how anyone could think their opposition to the resolution — not the defenses of Omar made by  Nancy Pelosi,  Jim Clyburn, and  2020 Democrats; nor Omar’s anti-Semitism itself — is the real scandal here.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

The Worst Cover-Up of All Time

President Donald Trump may be guilty of many things, but a cover-up in the Mueller probe isn’t one of them. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, attempting to appease forces in the Democratic party eager for impeachment, is accusing him of one, with all the familiar Watergate connotations. The charge is strange, ... Read More
White House

For Democrats, the Party’s Over

If the Democrats are really tempted by impeachment, bring it on. Since the day after the 2016 election they have been threatening this, placing their chips on the Russian-collusion fantasy and then on the phantasmagoric charade of obstruction of justice. The attorney general accurately gave the ingredients of the ... Read More
PC Culture

TV Before PC

Affixing one’s glance to the rear-view mirror is usually as ill-advised as staring at one’s own reflection. Still, what a delight it was on Wednesday to see a fresh rendition of “Those Were the Days,” from All in the Family, a show I haven’t watched for nearly 40 years. This time it was Woody Harrelson ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Democrats’ Other Class War

There is a class war going on inside the Democratic party. Consider these two cris de couer: Writing in the New York Times under the headline “America’s Cities Are Unlivable — Blame Wealthy Liberals,” Farhad Manjoo argues that rich progressives have, through their political domination of cities such as ... Read More