The Corner

Politics & Policy

Why Some Republicans Voted against the ‘Anti-Hate’ Resolution 

Rep. Ilhan Omar participates in a news conference in Washington, D.C., February 7, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Has the controversy surrounding Democratic congresswoman Ilhan Omar’s anti-Semitic comments actually turned into an embarrassing scandal for Republicans? In some quarters of the media, the answer to that question is a resounding “yes.”

That bit of conventional wisdom began to congeal as soon as the House passed an “anti-hate” resolution Thursday night. The resolution didn’t mention Omar by name and broadly condemned many types of bigotry — anti-Semitism as well as Islamophobia and white-supremacist persecution of “African Americans, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other people of color, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and others.” Some House Democrats like Ted Deutch of Florida and Eliot Engel of New York joined Republicans in disagreeing with House Democratic leaders who, under internal pressure, turned the resolution into a broad condemnation of almost all forms of bigotry rather than a resolution solely focused on anti-Semitism.

But in the end, every Democrat voted for the measure, while 23 Republicans voted against it. And that was the real story of the day, according to some.

“House Democrats have been under pressure for a week on anti-semitism but House Republicans have bailed them out,”  tweeted Politico’s Jake Sherman. “An embarrassing moment for house gop.”

“This is going to be hard to explain,”  tweeted  Michael Barbaro of the New York Times.

Jennifer Rubin of the  Washington Post wrote in an article that Republicans like Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Lee Zeldin of New York, who voted against the measure, had “snatched back the mantle of racial and religious insensitivity, announcing to the world that they couldn’t possibly be against both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.”

What’s odd, or perhaps  not so odd, is that Rubin doesn’t include a single quotation from any Republican explaining why he or she voted against the measure.

Here’s how Cheney explained her vote in a statement:

Today’s resolution vote was a sham put forward by Democrats to avoid condemning one of their own and denouncing vile anti-Semitism.

While I stand whole heartedly against discrimination outlined in this resolution, the language before the House today did not address the issue that is front and center.

Rep. Omar’s comments were wrong and she has proven multiple times that she embodies a vile, hate-filled, anti-Semitic, anti-Israel bigotry. She deserves to be rebuked, by name, and removed from the House Foreign Affairs Committee so that there is no mistake about the values and priorities that the House stands for.

For Democratic leadership to kowtow to their radical members and refuse to offer legislative language that criticizes Rep. Omar’s statements in the strongest possible manner confirms what we already knew: that their party is controlled by far-left extremists who can’t even muster the courage to stand up to blatant anti-Semitism.

This is a sad day for the House and Democrats’ lack of action is fully responsible for bringing us to this unfortunate moment.

Lee Zeldin made many of the same points in a floor speech. He also noted that, following Iowa Republican Steve King’s comments about white nationalism in January, Republicans stripped King of his committee assignments, and the whole House passed a resolution naming King and specifically condemning white nationalism. At the time, Cheney said King should resign from Congress.

You might still disagree with how Zeldin and Cheney voted, but after reading and listening to their explanations it’s hard to see how anyone could think their opposition to the resolution — not the defenses of Omar made by  Nancy Pelosi,  Jim Clyburn, and  2020 Democrats; nor Omar’s anti-Semitism itself — is the real scandal here.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have ... Read More
White House

Politico Doubles Down on Fake Turnberry Scandal

It's tough to be an investigative reporter. Everybody who feeds you a tip has an axe to grind. Or, alternatively, you find yourself going, "I wonder if . . . ?" You put in your research, you talk to lots of people, you accumulate a huge pile of information, but you still haven't proved your hypothesis. A wise ... Read More

Four Cheers for Incandescent Light Bulbs

It brought me much -- indeed, too much -- joy to hear of the Trump administration's rollback of restrictions on incandescent light bulbs, even if the ban will remain in place. The LED bulbs are terrible. They give off a pitiable, dim, and altogether underwhelming "glow," one that never matched the raw (if ... Read More
White House

Rachel Maddow’s Turnberry Tale

To a certain kind of Rachel Maddow viewer, there are few more titillating preludes to a news segment than the one she delivered Monday: “If you have not seen it yet, you are going to want to sit down.” Maddow’s story began, as many of her stories do, with President Trump, this time focused on his hotel ... Read More