The Corner

Wishful Thinking

According to a Washington Post editorial this morning, “Palestinian Candidate Mahmoud Abbas has been a strong and courageous opponent of violence against Israel and a strong supporter of Palestinian compromises to move toward a two-state solution.”

Would that it were so. To the best of my knowledge (Cornerites are invited to correct me if I’m wrong) Abbas has never opposed violence – not even the murder of children – on a moral basis (the only basis that could be called “courageous.”)

Instead, he has merely said that such acts, at this point in history, harm, rather than help the Palestinian cause (which may be defined variously as establishing a Palestinian state or wiping Israel off the face of the Earth).

And when has Abbbas ever said that the Palestinians will have to make serious compromises with the Israelis in order to achieve peace? By contrast, Ariel Sharon has often told Israelis that they must prepare to make “painful compromises.”

With this as background, it is no surprise – though it is a disappointment – that Abbas has waged his campaign by attacking “the Zionist enemy,” saying nothing that will help Palestinians move toward a resolution of the conflict that is less than they were promised by Arafat – less than a Palestinian victory and an Israeli defeat.

And remember: Abbas has had no serious opponent in this race. True, there are those who are not candidates who might attempt to kill him should he say anything that displeases them. But that will be true after he wins as well. And if the goal here is to build democratic values and institutions, would it not be useful for Abbas to say a few words critical of such people? Shouldn’t the Post have noted that?.

Clifford D. May — Clifford D. May is an American journalist and editor. He is the president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a conservative policy institute created shortly after the 9/11 attacks, ...

Most Popular

PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More

The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More