The Corner

Wrong Does Not Mean Unconstitutional

This is going to be a vital talking point at water coolers for the next month or so. The number of examples where the MSM has claimed that Alito is opposed to abortion based on his ruling in the Casey decision is already to numerous to list. It may well be that Alito is pro-life in all things. But as many have already pointed out (see Bench Memos), Alito’s position rested on an interpretation of law not on anything to do with core issues of abortion. Indeed, his position was about a very narrow issue in the orbit of abortion: is it okay for a state to require a woman to notify her spouse before she gets an abortion?

Ed Whelan does the heavy lifting on the technical issues. But let’s reduce the principle down to where most intra-cubicle squabbles and dinner table debates will take place. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that requiring spousal notification is 100% wrong in terms of public policy. That does not mean it is unconstitutional. Period. It is the exact same principle as John Roberts’ decision in the french fry case. He ruled that it was horrible that DC police arrested a little girl for eating one french fry on a subway platform. But that didn’t mean it was unconstitutional.

I’m truly flummoxed by people who argue that all good things must be constitutional and all bad things must be unconstitutional. If that were the case, why put lawyers on the court at all? Surely if the questions before the court are what’s good and what’s bad, there are people — priests, rabbis, ethicists — more qualified to decide such things than a bunch of lawyers.

Most Popular


The Democrats’ Disastrous CNN LGBT Town Hall

A few days after Donald Trump committed the worst foreign-policy blunder of his presidency by betraying America’s Kurdish allies in northern Syria, former vice president Joe Biden, the elder statesman and co-frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primary, was on a national stage talking to CNN’s primetime ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More