The Corner

You Mean They Talked About Iran?

Petraeus and Crocker were very outspoken today about Iran’s support for terrorists in Iraq, and indeed about Iran’s direct involvement: Quds Force officers operate in Iraq, and we have captured many high-ranking Quds officers. Iran trains, arms, and funds the “Special Groups,” a phrase used specifically to describe Iranian-run terrorist groups.

I haven’t read this afternoon’s testimony yet, but throughout the morning not a single Senator asked about the clear implications of these well established facts about Iran. As I wrote at some length on my blog:

I think General Petraeus is trying to force the Bush Administration to recognize these hard facts and act accordingly. He is saying that we cannot accomplish our objectives in Iraq without challenging the regime in Tehran. This does not necessarily entail an expansion of the war. I know of no high-ranking military officer or civilian official who favors a military assault on Iran (or on its strategic ally, Syria), and there are many things we can do to make the mullahs and their friends pay a steep price for attacking our people in Iraq and in Afghanistan as well

Yet, as it has been all along, this is the main question if we look at the war as a regional conflict and not just a battle for Iraq alone. Pity our national “debate” just won’t get there. Not yet, anyway.

Michael Ledeen — Michael Ledeen is an American historian, philosopher, foreign-policy analyst, and writer. He is a former consultant to the National Security Council, the Department of State, and the Department of Defense. ...

Most Popular


The 24 Democrats

Every presidential primary ends with one winner and a lot of losers. Some might argue that one or two once-little-known candidates who overperform low expectations get to enjoy a form of moral victory. (Ben Carson and Rick Perry might be happy how the 2016 cycle ended, with both taking roles in Trump’s cabinet. ... Read More