Critical Condition

Cannon Fires at Federal Takeover

The Cato Institute’s Michael Cannon did a bang-up job testifying in front of Dennis Kucinich’s House subcommittee yesterday. Some key points he made at the hearing:

Researchers “have found considerable evidence that unregulated markets provide consumers with reliable long-term protection from the cost of illness,” Cannon said. One team of researchers has reported that actual premiums paid for individual insurance are much less than proportional to risk, and risk levels have a small effect on obtaining coverage.

The increase in premiums as a result of risk represents only about 15% of the increase in risk, Cannon said.

Health insurer efforts to rescind policies as a result of alleged defects in applications have occurred in California, but insurers and their lawyers themselves know that the rescission cases are difficult to take to a jury, Cannon said. If Congress tries to make insurers hold prices down, the price controls would “punish insurers who provide quality coverage to the sick,” Cannon said. “Price controls will eliminate the plans that sick people find most attractive.”

If Congress tried to help health insurers hold down underwriting costs and spread risk by requiring individuals to own coverage, costs would go up, Cannon predicted.

In addition, if the government set up a government-run plan, patients might find that getting the government plan to live up to its benefits commitments may be far more difficult than getting private plans to pay benefits, because the government “wields the sole, legal, and unilateral power to breach its commitments without compensating those it harms,” Cannon said.

John Hood — John Hood is president of the John William Pope Foundation, a Raleigh-based grantmaker that supports public policy organizations, educational institutions, arts and cultural programs, and humanitarian relief in North Carolina ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More

G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collusion Scenario

It has become an article of faith in some quarters on the right -- well, most -- that the Mueller investigation has found no evidence of collusion with Russia and has accordingly shifted gears to process crimes like lying to the FBI or obstruction of justice. Having decided that this must be true, many have ... Read More