Critical Condition

Judge Makes Wrong Obamacare Decision

A federal judge in Michigan Thursday ruled that the health-overhaul law is constitutional, dismissing a suit brought by the Thomas More Law Center, which has vowed to appeal. 

Judge George C. Steeh of Federal District Court in Detroit, who was appointed by former President Clinton, decided the individual mandate is needed to compel Americans to obtain health insurance. He based his decision on the fact that other provisions of the law — such as requiring health insurers to sell policies to all comers and coverage for pre-existing conditions — make the individual mandate necessary.

Steeh said that without the individual mandate, consumers would have every incentive to wait until they get sick to buy coverage. (But that already is happening in Massachusetts even with the state’s individual mandate, which has stricter enforcement provisions than Obamacare.)

“In turn, this would aggravate current problems with cost-shifting and lead to even higher premiums,” Steeh wrote. (Ditto, Massachusetts.) “The prospect of driving the insurance market into extinction led Congress to find that the minimum coverage provision was essential to the larger regulatory scheme of the Act,” he wrote.

This is doubling down on a bad law, saying you need one unconstitutional mandate to protect people from its other adverse consequences. The correct ruling would be that the whole thing should be repealed to avoid both the unconstitutionality and destruction that Obamacare already is leaving in its wake.

This is the first ruling in more than 15 legal challenges against the law. Two other cases with higher profiles, one in Florida and one in Virginia, also are challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate and the reach of the federal government’s power through the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

The central question, which surely will go before the U.S. Supreme Court, is whether the Commerce Clause gives Congress the authority to require citizens to buy a commercial product, namely health insurance, with their own personal funds.

The judge in the Florida lawsuit, which was filed by elected officials in 20 states and the National Federation of Independent Business, is expected to allow a hearing on some aspects of the case in December. The Virginia case, brought by Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, is scheduled for a hearing Oct. 18.

Most Popular


Stick a Fork in O’Rourke

If, as I wrote last week here, Joe Biden may save the Democratic party from a horrible debacle at the polls next year, Beto O’Rourke may be doing the whole process a good turn now. Biden, despite his efforts to masquerade as the vanguard of what is now called progressivism, is politically sane and, if ... Read More

In Defense of the Electoral College

Senator Elizabeth Warren has joined a growing chorus within the Democratic party in calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. Speaking at a forum in Mississippi on Monday night, Warren said that she hoped to ensure that “every vote matters” and proposed that “the way we can make that happen is ... Read More

Ivy-League Schools Wither

A  number of liberal bastions are daily being hammered — especially the elite university and Silicon Valley. A Yale and a Stanford, or Facebook and Google, assume — for the most part rightly — that each is so loudly progressive that the public, federal and state regulators, and politicians would of ... Read More
National Security & Defense

In Defense of the Iraq War

Today is the 16th anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and Twitter is alive with condemnations of the conflict -- countered by precious few defenses. Yet I believed the Iraq War was just and proper in 2003, and I still believe that today. When Donald Trump condemned the war during the 2015 primary campaign and ... Read More