Human Exceptionalism

Human Exceptionalism Means Human Duties

I have been an apologist for human exceptionalism for years. I am still amazed at the sometimes very emotional criticism such views generate. 

Many of the brickbats are thrown by those who want to dismantle the very idea of human uniqueness so that they can attain ideological goals. But even some who agree with me about the issue worry that the term itself implies hubris and arrogance.

Not true!” says I. I settled on the HE term because it encompasses both our unique value and sole responsibilities. Focusing on just one side or the other creates an incomplete picture.

This is why a Weekly Standard book review of The Gap: The Science of What Separates Us from Other Animals, authored by Thomas Suddendorf, gave me a bit of a thrill. Here’s the key quote:

We alone can reason about past, present, and future motives, beliefs, and actions—and, based on this reasoning, make deliberate decisions about how we will act. No nonhuman comes remotely close to this moral capacity. So our ability to play the longest-sentence game is profound, and underlies everything from language to time travel to morality—indeed, all human culture.

But this exceptionalism comes with daunting responsibilities, Suddendorf believes. This is an important leitmotif that runs throughout the author’s arguments. Because we—and we alone—can anticipate the future and plan our actions, it follows that we have a moral responsibility to do what we can to avert disaster and create a sustainable future.

Our future depends on how well we imagine the possibilities of what is to come and our willingness to link our minds cooperatively to solve global problems.

Just what I’ve been saying!

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More