Human Exceptionalism

Human Life Does Not “Begin” at 22 Weeks

A Ph.D. in genetics named Ricki Lewis uses a “DNA science” blog to ask a cogent question: “When Does A Human Life Begin?” She then presents 17 potential time points, from sperm and egg through the joke, “acceptance into medical school.” Two warrant quoting. From the piece:

3. Of the hundreds of sperm surviving the swim upstream to the oocyte, one jettisons its tail and nuzzles inside the much larger cell, which obligingly becomes an ovum, completing its own meisosis. A fertilized ovum = conception.

14. A fetus has a chance of becoming a premature baby if delivered.

She chooses 14: But notice the switcheroo she pulls to get the answer she wants:

My answer? #14. The ability to survive outside the body of another sets a practical limit on defining when a sustainable human life begins.

But the question was, “When does a human life begins,” not, “When does a sustainable human life begin?”

The scientifically correct answer is number 3, at the latest. Embryology text books tell us that a new human life begins at the completion of the process of fertilization. That is when a distinct human organism–a new human being–is formed. 

This is her rationale for choosing 14:

Having a functional genome, tissue layers, a notochord, a beating heart … none of these matter if the organism cannot survive where humans survive…

But as long as the nascent human being remains in the womb (or Petri dish) where it can survive, it is a human being. If it is removed from a survivable environment, the human being that existed will die–which is true of all humans. But that does not mean he or she is a Martian, a mere collection of cells, or some other non human descriptive.  

And check this unscientific opinion:

Until an artificial uterus becomes a reality, technology defines, for me, when a human life begins, rather than biology.

That’s ideology, or philosophy–not science

Think of it this way: A human being can’t survive unassisted on the moon absent the creation of an artificial atmosphere via technology. Because the technology could break, and the astronaut die, does that make the moon astronaut less human? 

Of course not. The same goes for the embryo and fetus who are living in the womb. 

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Strzok by a Farce

An investigation is one of two things: a search for the truth, or a farce. The House is conducting a farce. That fact was on full display during ten hours of testimony by Peter Strzok, the logorrheic lawman who steered the FBI’s Clinton-emails and Trump–Russia probes. The principal question before the ... Read More


Dear Reader (Especially everyone who got ripped off ordering that giant blimp online), Imagine an alien race that built its civilization on the fact it literally defecated highly refined uranium, or super-intelligent and obedient nano-bots, or simply extremely useful Swiss Army knives. Now imagine one of ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Rise of the Abortion Cheerleaders

Is abortion a sad and unfortunate reality — regrettable, as we are sometimes told, but often necessary — or is it a breezy nothingburger, completely “normal,” and something to be giddily celebrated like a last-minute NFL touchdown?  For a long time, the abortion lobby has had difficulty deciding. This ... Read More
Film & TV

Stalin at the Movies

Toward the end of The Death of Stalin, two Communist Party bosses size up Joseph Stalin’s immediate successor, Georgy Malenkov. “Can we trust him?” one asks. “Can you ever really trust a weak man?” his comrade answers. Good question. Last week brought the news that the head of Shambhala ... Read More

‘The Warning Lights Are Blinking Red Again’

One of President Trump’s outstanding appointments has been Dan Coats, his director of national intelligence. Coats is a former House member, former senator, and former ambassador to Germany. He is a Hoosier (i.e., from Indiana). Whether he plays basketball, I don’t know. At Wheaton College, he played soccer. ... Read More