Human Exceptionalism

Indiana May Defund Planned Parenthood

I don’t know if this will pass the Indiana House or whether Gov. Mitch Daniels–he who wants a “truce” on social issues–will sign it, but PP is in some trouble in Indiana.  From the story:

Indiana could become the first state to end Medicaid coverage for Planned Parenthood services, after the Senate on Tuesday approved a bill that would cut off taxpayer money to the reproductive health-care provider. “The taxpayers will no longer fund an organization that provides abortion as part of their services that they give to the public,” said Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis, a co-sponsor of the measure. The Senate voted 35-13 to approve House  Bill 1210, which also shortens the window in which women can have abortions and mandates that doctors make certain statements to patients seeking the procedure…

Planned Parenthood of Indiana says cutting off its $3 million in government funding would put at risk the services it provides to 22,000 low-income Hoosiers, including birth control pills, cancer screenings and sexually transmitted disease tests. The group predicted the move would cost Indiana $68 million in Medicaid expenses for unintended pregnancies. “It makes absolutely no sense to reduce access to birth control when the objective is to reduce the incidence of abortion,” said Betty Cockrum, president of Planned Parenthood of Indiana.

I find it interesting that whenever PP defunding comes up, defenders bemoan the loss of cancer screenings and contraception dispensing for poor women, and materially downplay the importance of abortion in the overall PP menu of services.  Well, there is an easy way out of that conundrum–if they are truly the core of PP’s mission: Simply stop performing abortions and many people will stop objecting to its receiving taxpayer dollars.

But politics aside, we all know that PP believes fervently in abortion rights and that performing terminations is fundamental to its overarching mission of providing reproductive health services.  Okay: Then spin off a Planned Parenthood Lite–a completely separate entity with no financial or governance connections to PP–which only provides non abortion related health services–thereby leaving PP to do its abortions while receiving no taxpayer support of any kind.  After all, the Hyde Amendment prohibits Medicaid dollars from paying for abortion anyway, and the group claims there is a wall of separation between the services it provides with government funding and its abortion provision, so how would PP be harmed?  In that way, the controversy goes away, women get all of PP’s current services, and everybody is happy.  After all, it’s all about the women, right?

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
U.S.

G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Collusion Scenario

It has become an article of faith in some quarters on the right -- well, most -- that the Mueller investigation has found no evidence of collusion with Russia and has accordingly shifted gears to process crimes like lying to the FBI or obstruction of justice. Having decided that this must be true, many have ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More