Liberal Fascism

Socialism, Fascism & Racism

I’m running around like a headless chicken today [Why narrow it down to “today”? — The Couch].

But I see that Michael Ledeen’s review is launching some interesting conversation over at Philosophoblog.

I really want to spend some considered time on this, but there’s one point I want to throw my two cents in. Michael seems to be saying that Nazism was primary about racism, not socialism. And that the socialism was a mere epiphenomenon. I think he’s right and wrong about that. I think he’s forcing a hard  intellectual distinction that doesn’t need to be made. Socialism today is seen as a purely economic doctrine. It’s not. The “social question” was aimed at how best to organize society and economics was merely the best empirical grounds for having that discussion (and then the Marxists said every thing was about economics, etc). But for many non-Marxist socialists, socialism was about more than economics. For many socialists and progressives, socialism was racism and racism was socialism. Nazism was socialism for a race. The Nazi view was uglier and more extreme than anyone else’s, but it was not philosophically so distinct from the views of many progressives in America and socialists in Britain. Oliver Wendell Holmes believed that the heart of social reform wasn’t economics but the eugenic program to “build a race.” An excerpt from the book:

Just as socialist economics was a specialization within the larger

Progressive avocation, eugenics was a closely related specialty.

Eugenic arguments and economic arguments tracked each other,

complemented each other, and, at times, melted into each other.

Sidney Webb, the father of Fabian socialism and still among the

most revered British intellectuals, laid it out fairly clearly. “No consistent

eugenicist,” he explained, “can be a ‘Laissez Faire’ individualist

[that is, a conservative] unless he throws up the game in despair.

He must interfere, interfere, interfere!” The fact that the “wrong”

people were outbreeding the “right” ones would put Britain on the

path of “national deterioration” or, “as an alternative,” result “in this

country gradually falling to the Irish and the Jews.”

And then elsewhere in a discussion of the Wisconsin progressives:

Charles Van Hise, Roosevelt’s close adviser,

was more emphatic. “He who thinks not of himself primarily, but of

his race, and of its future, is the new patriot,” explained Van Hise, the

founder of the American conservation movement and president of

the University of Wisconsin during its glory days as the premier

training ground for American progressives.19 Van Hise summarized

the American Progressive attitude toward eugenics well when he explained:

“We know enough about agriculture so that the agricultural

production of the country could be doubled if the knowledge were

applies; we know enough about disease so that if the knowledge

were utilized, infectious and contagious diseases would be substantially

destroyed in the United States within a score of years; we know

enough about eugenics so that if the knowledge were applied, the defective

classes would disappear within a generation.”

In short I think Michael’s right that Nazism was primarily concerned with racism and not socialism, but only if you define socialism in purely economic terms. That is a distinction I think he’s imposing, not one that was necessarily maintained by the Nazis themselves.  The Nazis were socialists because they were racists, and they were racists because of the kind of socialism they embraced. Two sides of the same coin. 

Jonah Goldberg — Jonah Goldberg holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty at the American Enterprise Institute and is a senior editor of National Review. His new book, The Suicide of The West, is on sale now.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Kat Timpf Chased Out of Brooklyn Bar

Fox News personality and National Review contributor Kat Timpf was forced to leave a bar in Brooklyn over the weekend after a woman she had never met became enraged upon learning she worked in conservative media. Timpf, who has twice previously been harassed while socializing in New York City, first described ... Read More
Film & TV

The Dan Crenshaw Moment

Given the spirit of our times, things could have gone so differently. On November 3, when Saturday Night Live comic Pete Davidson mocked Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw’s eye patch, saying he looked like a “hit man in a porno movie” — then adding, “I know he lost his eye in war or whatever” — it was a ... Read More

The Present American Revolution

The revolution of 1776 sought to turn a colony of Great Britain into a new independent republic based on constitutionally protected freedom. It succeeded with the creation of the United States. The failed revolution of 1861, by a slave-owning South declaring its independence from the Union, sought to bifurcate ... Read More

Florida’s Shame, and Ours

Conspiracy theories are bad for civic life. So are conspiracies. I wonder if there is one mentally normal adult walking these fruited plains -- even the most craven, abject, brain-dead partisan Democrat -- who believes that what has been going on in Broward County, Fla., is anything other than a brazen ... Read More