Magazine | May 4, 2009, Issue

Letters

We’re Warning You

In “The Week” (April 6), the Editors take issue with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wyeth v. Levine. The Court held that when a drug harms a patient, the patient can sue in a state court, even if the drug’s maker followed the Food and Drug Administration’s guidelines — in other words, FDA guidelines don’t “preempt” state-level laws and lawsuits. The Editors also express a desire for a national standard governing warning labels on drugs.

But the case was rightly decided as a legal matter. While Congress has the power to preempt state laws having to do with interstate commerce — a power that the modern Supreme Court has interpreted broadly enough to cover drug labeling — in this instance it declined to do so. We imagine the Court would uphold a labeling law explicitly barring states from setting their own, stricter rules, as it did in the case of a pesticide statute decades ago. But unless such language is in the law, there’s nothing to keep a state from legislating on how drugs sold within its borders should be labeled.

Further, let us wonder why the Editors would ask for a national standard in drug labeling. Vermont might well create a poor, unworkable, and businessunfriendly standard for tort liability, but that’s (mainly) Vermont’s problem. Neither Wyeth nor any other drug company is required to sell its products there, and the people of the other 49 states are free to reject Vermont’s model as they please. Also, who’s to say that Washington won’t create a poor, unworkable, and business-unfriendly standard? The FDA is already setting a floor for what an adequate warning label is; do we also want the federal government setting the ceiling?

National Review typically does a fine job of defending federalism and subsidiarity, making arguments for a smaller federal government and for allocating power close to home, but on this issue the Editors have departed from that practice.

Andrew Fink (uncle)

Whitehall, Mich.

Andrew Fink (nephew)

Ypsilanti, Mich.

The Editors reply: We appreciate the kind words and the thoughtful letter, but we disagree. The Finks underestimate the extent to which the states have encroached on national commerce. The pharmaceutical company cannot avoid Vermont tort law if it has even minimal contacts with the state: if it sells other products there, or someone uses its product there. We respect subsidiarity, but sometimes the federal government is the smallest unit of government that can accomplish a necessary task — as in the case of protecting national commerce from the states. Congress, meanwhile, cannot possibly foresee and explicitly bar every creative method a rapacious state might use to undermine its laws, so the court should not require it to have done so.

 

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

A Recession’s Import

Much unnecessary confusion arises from using such phrases as “housing crisis” and “financial crisis” to mean “recession.” That confusion is compounded by wrongly equating the phrase “financial crisis” with the ...
Politics & Policy

Social Security Myths

‘When something is unsustainable,” so goes the aphorism, “it tends to stop.” Usually invoked about tangible phenomena, the old saw is equally true about unsustainable arguments. If a conception is ...
Politics & Policy

Cruz Control

Following two brutal election cycles, Republicans are adrift and nearly everyone fingers the same fundamental problem with the party: lack of leadership. Even Democrats have had trouble choosing an elected ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Mortal Remains

There is a stock character in fiction, particularly science fiction, who might be called the Immortal. Whether he be vampire or angel, alien or just some everyman blessed — or ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Trail Blazer

We live in the age of the full disclosure, so I am obliged to issue one about this biography of Cosmopolitan magazine’s legendary editor: I’m in it. Commenting on Helen Gurley ...
Politics & Policy

Western Civ

When the Reagan Ranch went up for sale in 1996, Nancy Reagan left behind most of the furniture and linens but removed a number of personal items. She didn’t want ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Bo joins the ranks of famous White House hounds: Barney, Checkers, Bill . . . ‐ Three Somali pirates found out the hard way that the most dangerous thing in ...
The Long View

Larry King Live!

Transcript: April 12, 2010 LARRY KING: Tomorrow night! Ryan Seacrest and last year’s American Idol! From Edmund, Oklahoma, hello! CALLER: Hi Larry. I just wanted to know if your guest has any ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

TRINITY I saw a small boy on a back lot in New York, Crouched, burning flies alive in a sealed jar With a magnifying glass he held up high, Focusing the fire of our ...
Happy Warrior

Helium Diplomacy

At the Royal Opera House in Covent Garden, they’re premiering a new ballet about a young French boy who’s befriended by a giant helium-filled balloon. Any balletomanes at the U.S. ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

We’re Warning You In “The Week” (April 6), the Editors take issue with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wyeth v. Levine. The Court held that when a drug harms a patient, ...

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Religion

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More