Magazine | May 4, 2009, Issue

Letters

We’re Warning You

In “The Week” (April 6), the Editors take issue with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wyeth v. Levine. The Court held that when a drug harms a patient, the patient can sue in a state court, even if the drug’s maker followed the Food and Drug Administration’s guidelines — in other words, FDA guidelines don’t “preempt” state-level laws and lawsuits. The Editors also express a desire for a national standard governing warning labels on drugs.

But the case was rightly decided as a legal matter. While Congress has the power to preempt state laws having to do with interstate commerce — a power that the modern Supreme Court has interpreted broadly enough to cover drug labeling — in this instance it declined to do so. We imagine the Court would uphold a labeling law explicitly barring states from setting their own, stricter rules, as it did in the case of a pesticide statute decades ago. But unless such language is in the law, there’s nothing to keep a state from legislating on how drugs sold within its borders should be labeled.

Further, let us wonder why the Editors would ask for a national standard in drug labeling. Vermont might well create a poor, unworkable, and businessunfriendly standard for tort liability, but that’s (mainly) Vermont’s problem. Neither Wyeth nor any other drug company is required to sell its products there, and the people of the other 49 states are free to reject Vermont’s model as they please. Also, who’s to say that Washington won’t create a poor, unworkable, and business-unfriendly standard? The FDA is already setting a floor for what an adequate warning label is; do we also want the federal government setting the ceiling?

National Review typically does a fine job of defending federalism and subsidiarity, making arguments for a smaller federal government and for allocating power close to home, but on this issue the Editors have departed from that practice.

Andrew Fink (uncle)

Whitehall, Mich.

Andrew Fink (nephew)

Ypsilanti, Mich.

The Editors reply: We appreciate the kind words and the thoughtful letter, but we disagree. The Finks underestimate the extent to which the states have encroached on national commerce. The pharmaceutical company cannot avoid Vermont tort law if it has even minimal contacts with the state: if it sells other products there, or someone uses its product there. We respect subsidiarity, but sometimes the federal government is the smallest unit of government that can accomplish a necessary task — as in the case of protecting national commerce from the states. Congress, meanwhile, cannot possibly foresee and explicitly bar every creative method a rapacious state might use to undermine its laws, so the court should not require it to have done so.

 

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

A Recession’s Import

Much unnecessary confusion arises from using such phrases as “housing crisis” and “financial crisis” to mean “recession.” That confusion is compounded by wrongly equating the phrase “financial crisis” with the ...
Politics & Policy

Social Security Myths

‘When something is unsustainable,” so goes the aphorism, “it tends to stop.” Usually invoked about tangible phenomena, the old saw is equally true about unsustainable arguments. If a conception is ...
Politics & Policy

Cruz Control

Following two brutal election cycles, Republicans are adrift and nearly everyone fingers the same fundamental problem with the party: lack of leadership. Even Democrats have had trouble choosing an elected ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Mortal Remains

There is a stock character in fiction, particularly science fiction, who might be called the Immortal. Whether he be vampire or angel, alien or just some everyman blessed — or ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Western Civ

When the Reagan Ranch went up for sale in 1996, Nancy Reagan left behind most of the furniture and linens but removed a number of personal items. She didn’t want ...
Politics & Policy

Trail Blazer

We live in the age of the full disclosure, so I am obliged to issue one about this biography of Cosmopolitan magazine’s legendary editor: I’m in it. Commenting on Helen Gurley ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

We’re Warning You In “The Week” (April 6), the Editors take issue with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Wyeth v. Levine. The Court held that when a drug harms a patient, ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Bo joins the ranks of famous White House hounds: Barney, Checkers, Bill . . . ‐ Three Somali pirates found out the hard way that the most dangerous thing in ...
The Long View

Larry King Live!

Transcript: April 12, 2010 LARRY KING: Tomorrow night! Ryan Seacrest and last year’s American Idol! From Edmund, Oklahoma, hello! CALLER: Hi Larry. I just wanted to know if your guest has any ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

TRINITY I saw a small boy on a back lot in New York, Crouched, burning flies alive in a sealed jar With a magnifying glass he held up high, Focusing the fire of our ...
Happy Warrior

Helium Diplomacy

At the Royal Opera House in Covent Garden, they’re premiering a new ballet about a young French boy who’s befriended by a giant helium-filled balloon. Any balletomanes at the U.S. ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Did Flynn Lie?

At the outset, let’s get two things straight: First, there is something deeply disturbing about the Obama administration’s decision to open a counterintelligence investigation on retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn while he was working on the Trump campaign — and, ultimately, about the Justice ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Where Is the Flynn 302?

Better late than never (I hope), my weekend column has posted on the website. It deals with the question whether General Michael Flynn actually lied to the FBI agents — including the now infamous Peter Strzok — when they interviewed him in the White House on his third day on the job as national security ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Who’s in Charge Here?

In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump was asked on many occasions whether he would “accept the results” of the election if he were to lose. Democrats and their media allies demanded that he make a solemn vow to “accept the results.” It was never entirely clear what anybody thought ... Read More
Culture

Remembering Christopher Hitchens

Tributes to the late Christopher Hitchens, who died seven years ago yesterday, are trending on Twitter. Hardly surprising. Hitchens had one of those rare, magnetic personalities and a genius for friendship according to some of the most talented writers around today such as Douglas Murray, Christopher Buckley, and ... Read More
U.S.

G-File Mailbag: The Results of a Bad Idea

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Including those of you just standing there eating Zarg nuts), I had a bad idea. It wasn’t a terrible idea, like asking a meth addict ... Read More