Magazine | December 21, 2009, Issue

But Now We Shout ‘No!’

(Roman Genn)
Rising Republican fortunes reveal a backlash against the Democrats’ excesses

Barack Obama’s election was supposed to signal a monumental shift in public affairs. His victory was to be the liberal counterpoint to 1980, with Obama as the left-wing Ronald Reagan. He was the leader of a new majority, one that demanded a more active role for the government in the average American’s life. 

So much for that! Less than a year after the 44th president’s inauguration, conservatives are on the rebound. Gallup recently found that self-identified conservatives accounted for two out of five Americans, double the number of liberals. The public is also coming around to the Republican party, both in polls and at the ballot box: Republicans won a major victory in the New Jersey gubernatorial race last month, swept the field in Virginia, and gained ground in Pennsylvania.

What is the cause of this rebound? Some liberals — Markos Moulitsas comes to mind — have argued that the Democratic party has not been liberal enough. But make no mistake: This government is about as liberal as any since the New Deal, and the return of the Right is a consequence of the Left’s overreach.

A metric commonly used to track the ideology of members of Congress is the DW-Nominate system developed by Profs. Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. Their data show that the 110th House of Representatives — the last one in Pres. George W. Bush’s term — was as liberal as any since the Great Depression. The 111th House has about 25 fewer Republicans and 25 more Democrats, though it’s too soon to tell for sure whether it’s more liberal by the DW-Nominate metric.

As for the Senate, there has been a noticeable leftward shift thanks to the election in 2008 of new Democratic senators. Using a different methodology, Poole and Rosenthal estimate that Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Mark Pryor of Arkansas are in the middle of the upper chamber this year — and historically these two have earned fairly liberal scores from the DW-Nominate system. 

The liberalism of southern Democrats like Landrieu and Pryor illustrates another feature of the 111th Congress: Conservative Democrats from Dixie are in short supply. The tenure of Rep. Heath Shuler (D., N.C.) is a case in point. Shuler — who represents Asheville and the western part of the Tar Heel State — has gotten flak from his party for bucking Speaker Pelosi on a series of important votes. Most recently, he broke with the leadership by voting not only against the health-care bill, but also against the motion to bring it to the floor. Yet 50 years ago, his politics would have been about those of an average Southern Democrat. Republicans once aligned with such members to defeat the programs of the Democratic left wing. Nowadays, there are simply not enough Heath Shulers to form such a coalition.

Broadly speaking, this kind of polarization has characterized both parties, even if the mainstream media’s focus is solely on how “radical” the GOP has become. In the last 50 years, Republicans have become more conservative, and Democrats have become more liberal. So, while the Democratic party controls as many seats now as it did in 1971, today’s Democratic congressmen are substantially more liberal.

What’s more, the few moderate Democrats left in the chamber do not have control over the important committees. When she won the speaker’s gavel in 2007, Nancy Pelosi made a consequential decision to award committee chairmanships on the basis of seniority. Fifty years ago, that would have been a boon to southern, conservative Democrats, because the South was a one-party region and southern Democrats, once elected, rarely lost. But Dixie is no longer solely the domain of the Democrats, and southern Democrats are less likely to have the seniority needed to gavel Ways and Means or Judiciary. Meanwhile, urban and coastal congressional districts have become one-party fiefdoms. Ultra-liberal members like Charlie Rangel and John Conyers never have to worry about defeat — and thus they hold the important gavels. The most moderate committee chairman is probably Ike Skelton of Missouri, of the Armed Services Committee — and it is a stretch to label him a moderate.

As if this were not enough, Barack Obama is the president of the United States. Few Democratic presidents have had weaker ties to the South, the historic base of the party of Jackson. That Obama could win the presidency without much support from the South says a great deal about the Democrats’ slow, steady transformation into a party dominated by northern and western liberals. 

So can it be any wonder that this government has pursued the agenda it has? The stimulus bill, the cap-and-trade bill, and the health-care bill were all designed under the direction of liberal committee chairmen, voted upon by a Congress that tilts farther to the left than any since the Great Depression, and promoted by a president that National Journal labeled the most liberal senator of 2007. Not only that, Obama and the congressional leadership have again and again shown their willingness to shed the votes of the more “moderate” members in order to pull these bills as far left as possible. Ike Skelton may be a liberal by historical standards, but the health-care bill voted on last month was too liberal for him. Thirty-eight Democrats joined him in defecting on the president’s top domestic priority. There were even more defections on the cap-and-trade vote. 

The public increasingly sees this government for what it is. Around the time of Obama’s election last year, just 28 percent of likely voters told Rasmussen that then-senator Obama was “very liberal.” Today, that number is up to 46 percent. So it is fair to ask: Is this dramatic leftward shift what the country voted for last November?

I highly doubt it. When Barack Obama ran for office, he campaigned as a bipartisan healer. He railed against the “phony bipartisanship” of his predecessor and the “pettiness of our politics.” He wanted to change the tone, to adopt the best ideas of both sides and forge a broad consensus. He has not governed in this way. Instead, he has shown himself to be much more partisan than George W. Bush, who was able to garner bipartisan support on his major domestic reforms. Obama, by contrast, has pushed liberal bills that few if any Republicans could support, then blasted Republican obstructionism and pettiness. The media excuse this kind of attack because — being the northeastern social liberals they generally are — they are part of his core constituency. But that does not mean the broader public has failed to notice. 

Additionally, 49 districts voted for John McCain for president while sending a Democrat to Congress. Many of these congressional Democrats are Blue Dogs, and won election by emphasizing their independence from the national party or their roots in the district. The size of the current Democratic majority is 41 seats, meaning that these McCain Democrats make the difference between Pelosi as speaker and Pelosi as minority leader. There are also 13 Democratic senators in states that John McCain won. This is more than the size of Harry Reid’s majority. 

So it is indeed a stretch to argue that the country voted for a dramatic leftward “correction” in public policy last fall. It voted for a presidential candidate who promised to reach a hand across the aisle, and in many congressional districts the people split their ballots — which if anything should be interpreted as an endorsement of Obama’s broken promise to bridge the nation’s political divides. 

This conclusion accounts for the country’s subsequent shift to the right in the polls and at the ballot box. If voters last fall did not seek root-and-branch change but are now having it foisted on them anyway, we should expect to see exactly the backlash we are seeing. And if voters are in search of a moderate, bipartisan course for public policy and the governing Democratic party is not delivering it to them, then bringing back the Republicans is their only option.

Americans have rarely used the biennial election as an occasion to change the government dramatically. Yet if the Democrats continue to pursue uncompromising, dogmatically liberal policies, we should expect the country to take advantage of the opportunity the framers wisely granted it. 

– Mr. Cost is the author of the HorseRaceBlog at

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Trust Science

The ninth commandment is: trust science. By this we mean a true science, based on objectively established criteria and agreed foundations, with a rational methodology and mature criteria of proof ...


Politics & Policy

Shifty Shifting

‘This,” said Eric Holder, “is almost a ‘Trust me’ thing.” The attorney general of the United States was trying to reassure Alice Hoagland, whose 31-year-old son, Mark Bingham, lost his ...
Politics & Policy

Lani’s Heir

  Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson has called Eric Holder “the most destructive member of Barack Obama’s Cabinet.” The description is apt. The attorney general’s questionable judgment extends far beyond the ...
Politics & Policy

VAT Attack

The U.S. has a smaller government than most rich countries do, but we don’t have much lower corporate tax rates or top income-tax rates. That’s one conclusion to be drawn ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

One of Us

When Sarah Palin was announced to the world as John McCain’s vice-presidential running mate in summer 2008, she was almost completely unknown outside Alaska. She had made a few feisty ...


Politics & Policy


The Talented Mr. Moto Terry Teachout should be sorry! How can he discuss John P. Marquand and his works (“Be Careful What You Ask For,” November 23) without any mention of ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Tiger is probably glad he didn’t give his wife any pointers on how to swing a 9-iron. ‐ On a party-line vote, the Senate decided to start debating Harry Reid’s ...
Politics & Policy

The Long View

To: (undisclosedrecipients)@ From: Cardinal.Bianchi@ Date: Dec. 6, 1632 Subject: Housekeeping before the big Revolving Sun conference Guys: Please delete all e-mails you’ve got in re: the Sun’s revolution around the Earth and our ...
Politics & Policy


THE MEDAL Bear, would you like to see my purple heart? Terrified, I followed Uncle Eddie up the stairs, expecting to see—God knows, what hideous thing, what awful hidden wound from the Great War. He ...
Happy Warrior

Rising Tide

The Swiss minaret ban and the leaked climate e-mails are really the same story — or, more precisely, are symptoms of the same disease. In the Times of London, Oliver ...

Most Popular

Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More

The Kaepernick Saga Drags On . . . off the Field

Colin Kaepernick’s workout for NFL teams in Atlanta this weekend did not run smoothly. The league announced an invitation to scouts from every team to watch Kaepernick work out and demonstrate that he was still ready to play. (As noted last week, the workout is oddly timed; the NFL season is just a bit past its ... Read More

Israel’s New Way of War

Commuters on Route 4, driving toward the Israeli coastal city of Ashdod on November 12, were shocked by an explosion, a rocket impact next to a major intersection. Had it fallen on a car or one of the many trucks plying the route, there would have been deaths, and the road would have been closed. Instead, police ... Read More
White House

Decide Trump’s Fate at the Ballot Box

If Donald Trump’s presidency is going to end before 2025, it should end at the ballot box. A lot of what has been revealed by Trump’s desire to see Ukraine investigate Joe and Hunter Biden -- or at least publicly announce an investigation -- merely confirms character traits, instincts, and habits that have ... Read More

‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More