Magazine July 5, 2010, Issue

Your Money Back

Outside the Federal Reserve building in Washington, D.C. (Larry Downing/Reuters)
There is a strong economic case that the Federal Reserve should not exist

Is Ron Paul’s suggestion that the Federal Reserve be eliminated a “fringe position,” as Josh Barro suggested in the last edition of National Review (“Mend the Fed,” June 21)?

It depends on what “fringe” means. If it means simply that a large majority disagrees, then Representative Paul’s position deserves that characterization. But if “fringe” is meant to imply that abolishing the Fed is a lunatic idea that is not supported by economic theory, then Paul’s position is far from it. In fact, a number of economists argue that the economy would operate more smoothly without a Federal Reserve.

Paul’s position is supported

In This Issue



Books, Arts & Manners


The Week

The Week

Helen Thomas was a fixture — a reporter for 40 years, a columnist for ten — always a plus in Washington. She was a left-wing scold: another plus.


The Latest