Magazine | November 1, 2010, Issue

Film: A Mighty Wurlitzer

A review of Waiting for ‘Superman’

There are few genres I find as wearying as the political documentary. This is true even when they’re competently done: The more skillfully the film makes its points, hails its heroes, and skewers its villains, the more I tend to sit squirming in my seat, resisting the urge to hurl rejoinders at the screen, and muttering over and over again under my breath: “It’s more complicated than that . . .”

In part, I’m usually just allergic to the political point that’s being made: In the world of documentary filmmaking, after all, the ideological spectrum runs from Al Gore on the right to Noam Chomsky on the left, with Michael Moore’s girth bestriding most of the territory in between. (And the less said about the occasional right-wing “answers” to Moore’s efforts, the better.)

But after watching Davis Guggenheim’s much-lauded Waiting for ‘Superman, I’m beginning to suspect that my problem with the political documentary isn’t just ideological. Here, for once, is a piece of docu-agitprop that I actually agree with: a heart-tugging, blood-boiling brief against America’s educational bureaucracy, with teachers’ unions playing the heavy and school choice held up as a panacea. And it still annoyed the heck out of me.

Guggenheim’s personal story has a classic neoconservative trajectory. He’s a conventional Hollywood liberal (and the husband of Elisabeth Shue, as it happens) who directed both Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth and Barack Obama’s biographical film for the 2008 Democratic convention, and who apparently never considered that government failures might be even worse than market failures until the time came to put his kids in school. Early in his career, Guggenheim made a documentary about the heroism of first-year public-school teachers. But ten years later (as he tells it, in the movie’s overture), he drives past one . . . two . . . three public schools every day, on the way to the private school where his own children are enrolled.

The movie that he’s spun out of this mugged-by-reality realization follows five children, four urban (from L.A., Harlem, the Bronx, and Washington, D.C.) and one suburban (from Redwood City, Calif.), in their quest to win a place in a charter school and escape the mediocrity or outright failure of their local public institution. It has real heroes: the kids themselves, their dedicated parents, and such figures as Michelle Rhee, D.C.’s reforming school superintendent, and Geoffrey Canada, the indefatigable founder of the Harlem Children’s Zone. It has a sour-faced villain, in the form of Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers. It has disquisitions on public policy, helped along by animation, in which we learn just how hard it is to fire a poor-performing teacher. And it has a suitably wrenching conclusion: the public lotteries that determine admission to the charter schools, in which parents and children gather in auditoriums and gymnasiums to watch as the tumbling of colored balls determines their fates for the next year, and for years and years to come.

#page#I bought Guggenheim’s premise (our schools are broken, and the bureaucracy’s to blame). I bought his solution (more charter schools, more merit pay for teachers, and a teachers’ union that doesn’t prevent lousy instructors from being sacked). I definitely bought the personal drama: It would take a heart of stone to watch these families being let down by America’s public institutions without feeling for their plight.

Yet sitting there in the theater, I kept resisting the film, picking out its overgeneralizations, noting its elisions and evasions, letting its crusading spirit irritate me instead of being uplifted by it. I tried to imagine how a smart left-winger would critique the movie — by focusing on issues of race and segregation and “white flight,” probably, which the movie tap-dances away from at every opportunity. I wondered what a conservative sociologist might say about the movie’s insistence that schools and schools alone can make so great a difference — as though family breakdown and single parenthood, which scar the lives of many of the movie’s children, don’t play a greater role in keeping the underclass where it is. And I scoffed at Guggenheim’s Pollyannish suggestion that with the right schools and the right teachers, socioeconomic differences could all but melt away.

Don’t get me wrong: This is a good movie (if perhaps a bit too sprawling, covering too many families, cities, and bureaucracies in too little time), made with noble purpose, in the service of an essentially righteous cause. And given that I spend my career in the world of opinion journalism, I’m hardly in a position to criticize somebody for being polemical, and for giving short shrift to caveats and countervailing arguments.

But there’s still something about a political documentary that feels different from the written word — more claustrophobic, more one-sided, more oppressively unfair. A written argument you can put down, set aside, click away from; whether on the Internet or in a library, a countervailing view is never far away. But in the dark of a theater the film becomes the world entire, and throughout the running time, at least, the director controls the contours of debate completely. It’s a particular kind of intellectual tyranny, however well-intentioned — and even when I admire its message and execution, I don’t think I’ll ever learn to like it.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Rust Belt Revival

Call them Reagan-Hillary Democrats. That label may sound awkward, but it provides a useful description of the working-class whites who helped the Gipper secure a pair of landslides in the ...
Politics & Policy

Oslo Scores

On the second Friday in October, the customary day, the Norwegian Nobel Committee made its big announcement. This is the committee that determines the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. ...

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Hope from the Past

Every generation gets the George Washington it deserves. In the polyester, Watergate-era Seventies, Gore Vidal reduced America’s most revered president to a pompous figure of fun in his novel Burr, ...
Politics & Policy

Young Lisbeth

I got Dan Brown, I really did. The history was bunk, the prose was Lego, and yet there was something there — that maddening, tantalizing what’s-going-to-happen-next — that kept me ...
Country Life

The Eternal Seasons

As torrents in summer, Half dried in their channels, Suddenly rise, though the Sky is still cloudless, For rain has been falling Far off at their fountains, So hearts that are fainting Grow full to o’erflowing, And they ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ If Congress wants to prosecute those who accept foreign money, Tim Geithner had better keep a suitcase packed. ‐ At his White House farewell, Rahm Emanuel, President Obama’s departing chief ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

THE SUIT My grandfather, nineteen years of age, Falls from the pages of the unabridged Dictionary where I keep him pressed, A sepia print of him in his second suit, A double-breasted serge. The satin ...
Athwart

Action-Game Activism

We’re told the election will be about the economy. As in, “We would like to have one again.” No luxuries like social issues: When businesses can hire without worrying that ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

Practically Idealist In John Derbyshire’s most informative review of The High Tide of American Conservatism (“Bliss Was It . . . ,” October 4), he uses a familiar quote from Calvin Coolidge ...

Most Popular

Culture

Ezra Klein’s Intellectual Demagoguery

Ezra Klein wants you to know that he doesn’t think Sam Harris is a racist. “I’m not here to say you’re racist, I don’t think you are,” Klein explains in a two-hour debate with Harris on the latter’s podcast, Waking Up. “We have not called you one.” No, not at all. Klein is telling the truth ... Read More
Education

The Scholarship/Activism Balance — A Rejoinder

The Martin Center recently published an article by sociology professor Fabio Rojas, in which he argued that professors should maintain the right balance between their teaching and scholarship on the one hand, and activism on the other. In today's article, the Center's Jay Schalin pushes back somewhat. Schalin ... Read More
U.S.

The Book Comey Wanted to Write

Making the click-through worthwhile: the book James Comey had wanted to write, Facebook starts to feel useless to some writers, an infamous D.C. city councilman manages to make everything worse, and Hillary Clinton’s campaign finds its wish granted. What Did James Comey’s First Draft of A Higher ... Read More
Film & TV

Pro-Life Feminist

My paisana at the Human Life Review are hosting an event in NYC on Thursday, May 3, at the Sheen Center (18 Bleeker Street) for the airing of director Jim Hanon’s half-hour documentary, Pro-Life Feminist. After the viewing, he’ll join the trio of castmates -- Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, Aimee Murphy, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Good News for Pompeo

Looks like he's in, as he should be. https://twitter.com/TomCottonAR/status/987050849317867521 But this fight has been a hint of what life will be like for Trump if the Democrats somehow take the Senate -- they'd refuse to confirm anyone for anything. Read More