Magazine | November 15, 2010, Issue

Northern Light

Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life, by Nicholas Phillipson (Yale, 345 pp., $32.50)

In modern American liberal-arts colleges, the Scottish Enlightenment tends to get short shrift. Except in specialized courses focused on the intellectual history of the 18th century at the few institutions where these are offered, David Hume, Adam Smith, and lesser lights — such as Adam Ferguson, William Robertson, John Millar, Lord Kames, and Dugald Stewart — generally pass unread, and all too often they go unmentioned as well. This is in part due to the fact that — like Montaigne and Montesquieu, intellectual giants who are similarly neglected — the Scots were inclined to write books too long to be easily digested by students taking a survey course. But it arises also as a side effect of the more or less arbitrary articulation of liberal-arts colleges into departments dedicated to discrete disciplines. Authors who are neither fish nor fowl, who straddle what we think of today as separate disciplines, receive little attention.

Of course, Adam Smith does get mentioned — and far more often than his close friend and mentor David Hume. Nearly everyone who is even half-educated has heard of his Wealth of Nations (1776). But the book is long and rarely read. If asked about it, very few of those who graduate from even the best of our liberal-arts institutions would be able to explain what Smith had in mind when he spoke of the “invisible hand,” and almost none of these would be aware that its author wrote another great book — The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759).

This is a great shame — for those who have not been exposed to Smith’s argument in the latter work have missed a great deal. Courses in modern political philosophy tend to hopscotch from Machiavelli to Hobbes and Locke, then on to Rousseau; and courses in ethics generally jump from Hobbes to Kant. In skipping blithely past the Scots, they leave students with a false impression — that, according to the moderns, political and moral obligations have their foundation in a crass calculation regarding one’s own security and material well-being, in a self-forgetting passion for the public good, or in a heroic and selfless will informed by the categorical imperative. But the Scots, who were no less inclined than Rousseau and Kant to recoil in disgust at what Hume termed “the selfish system of morals” of Hobbes and Locke, looked elsewhere for a foundation. Like Smith’s teacher Francis Hutcheson, they felt the force of the withering criticism leveled at these two Englishmen by Lord Shaftesbury; and, to this, they responded by attempting in divers ways to negotiate a return to something like the ethical theory of Aristotle — without, however, embracing his metaphysics.

In this enterprise, Smith was arguably more successful than was Hume. In his Theory of Moral Sentiments, he articulated a neo-Aristotelian account of the moral life akin to the analysis underpinning the De Officiis of Cicero — the one classical author wholeheartedly admired by the Scots — and he grounded it in the human capacity for sympathy and the natural human desire to garner respect and be genuinely worthy of it. For Smith, as for Aristotle, morality is neither selfless nor what we would call selfish, but it is self-regarding. Men, as Smith understands them, are not isolated operators who calculate their interests. They make their way within civil society, and they are embedded in a social nexus in which they find that they have obligations (officia in Cicero’s Latin) to parents, siblings, spouses, friends, professional associates, fellow citizens, and the like. They are held to a certain standard by their parents, their teachers, and the others whom they encounter as they mature, and they spend a great deal of time thinking about what it means to be respectable — initially, perhaps, as a consequence of vanity, but in time for reasons less ignoble. If they crave admiration, they come to be even more desirous of deserving it.

#page#Nicholas Phillipson taught the history of the Scottish Enlightenment at the University of Edinburgh for almost 40 years, from 1965 to 2004. He has published extensively on the history of Scotland in the 18th century and on its institutions, above all its universities. He is the author of an important study on David Hume as a historian, and he writes with vigor and grace. His intellectual biography of Adam Smith, decades in the making, is his magnum opus. It has two very considerable virtues: It pays no less attention to the author of The Theory of Moral Sentiments than to the author of The Wealth of Nations, and it situates Smith firmly in the Anglo-Scottish world in which he lived. In the process, however, it slights influences foreign to this context, including Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, the Jansenist Pierre Nicole, and Montesquieu. Phillipson’s depiction of Montesquieu — whose Spirit of Laws was no less important a catalyst for the Scottish Enlightenment than were Hume’s works — suggests that he never took the trouble to study the Frenchman’s work with any care and that his knowledge of the secondary literature on the subject is 40 years out of date.

These defects notwithstanding, Phillipson’s biography is exceedingly valuable. From it, we learn an enormous amount about everything that was near to Smith and dear — for Phillipson knows 18th-century Scotland better than any scholar alive. From the biography, we learn what it was like to be born in 1723 as the posthumous son of a civil servant of gentry ancestry and to have as one’s mother the daughter of a Fife laird. In it we are introduced to Kirkcaldy, “a small, decent, unprepossessing port on the Firth of Forth,” where Smith was reared, went to school, closely observed the habitual conduct of merchants, and eventually penned The Wealth of Nations. In it, we also become familiar with the burgh school run by David Miller, where Smith mastered Greek and Latin; had occasion to see on stage Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, a comedy derived from Aesop, and Joseph Addison’s Cato; and read Epictetus’s Enchiridion, Cicero’s De Officiis, and the Spectator essays of Addison and Steele.

Phillipson then takes us to the University of Glasgow, where Smith was enrolled straightaway as a third-year student at the ripe old age of 14. Glasgow he describes for us as a fiercely Presbyterian boom town — dominated by “the tobacco lords,” who, thanks to Scotland’s union with England, had come to play a prominent role in the transatlantic trade, and were mildly wary of the university as a hotbed of freethinking. It was there, as Phillipson explains, that Smith learned Euclidean geometry and Newtonian physics and studied moral philosophy, ancient and modern, with Francis Hutcheson. It was there that he read Augustinians such as Malebranche, mastered The Art of Thinking, by Antoine Arnauld and Nicole, and was called upon to study Hobbes, Pufendorf, Shaftesbury, and Mandeville, and to assess Hutcheson’s attempt to ground ethics in what he called “the moral sense.” It was there as well that he first began to reflect on the commercial revolution then transforming Scotland and Europe.

#page#Smith left Glasgow in 1740, when he was 17, to take up residence at Balliol College, Oxford, then firmly Jacobite in sentiment — which cannot have been a congenial setting for a young man of skeptical disposition, reared as a Presbyterian and sympathetic to Whiggery. We know very little regarding what he did in the six years he spent there, other than to teach himself French and read Pierre Bayle, Descartes, Pascal, La Rochefoucauld, and the playwrights Racine and Marivaux. Phillipson takes seriously the posthumous report that, while at Balliol, Smith was caught reading Hume’s recently published Treatise of Human Nature and severely reprimanded, and he suggests that Smith turned to that unheralded work only after reading Hume’s much more popular Essays Moral, Political, and Literary.

In any case, by the time that Smith, who returned to Scotland in the wake of the Jacobite rebellion and the battle of Culloden, met the author of these controversial works in 1749–50, he was, we are told, “a committed Humean,” fully persuaded by his fellow Scot’s contention “that all claims that reason has the power to supply us with knowledge about the world, and the power to regulate our understanding and conduct, rest on essentially theological claims about the special powers of reason and are therefore ‘unphilosophical,’” and in sympathy with his conviction that “what passes as ‘knowledge’ has its roots in the imagination and the passions and in the use of intellectual powers we acquire through habit, custom, education and the experience of common life.”

It was, Phillipson asserts, on this foundation that Smith first elaborated a conjectural history of the origins of language and later began to construct a philosophical system suited to a commercial society governed by a mixed monarchy, specifying the processes by which human beings spontaneously construct for themselves over time moral sentiments, the market, the liberal arts, law, and government. The disparate elements within this historically oriented system Smith initially sketched out in public lectures and in the courses that he taught at Glasgow. Eventually, he hoped to present his scheme to the public in a series of treatises encompassing not only ethics and political economy but also a philosophical history of literature, philosophy, poetry, and rhetoric and a theory and history of law and government. The first two subjects were covered in Smith’s two great books. What he had written on the latter two subjects but not completed to his own satisfaction, at his insistence, his executors destroyed. But Phillipson is able to reconstruct much of what Smith hoped to say on the basis of lecture notes taken by his students, and for his efforts in this regard we should be grateful, for this biography allows us to grasp Smith’s remarkable system as a whole.

– Mr. Rahe holds the Charles O. Lee and Louise K. Lee Chair in the Western Heritage at Hillsdale College and is the author most recently of Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundations of the Modern Republic and Soft Despotism, Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect (both 2009).

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Hard Money

The U.S. economy is at risk of falling into either an inflationary or a deflationary spiral, which is a consequence of the Federal Reserve’s having been either too loose or ...
Politics & Policy

NPR’s Class Act

A few years ago, during my weekly commentary on the local public-radio station, I used the word “midget.” I was explaining the ruthless and whip-fast efficiency of the Hollywood casting machine. ...


Politics & Policy

Red Scare

During the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama’s most loyal and affectionate constituency was one that cannot legally vote in U.S. elections: foreigners. His campaign and subsequent election were celebrated in European, ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

The Obama Vision

The charge by some conservatives that President Obama was and indeed still is a socialist has been met with disbelief or brushed aside as irrelevant by our liberal elites, most ...
Politics & Policy

Northern Light

In modern American liberal-arts colleges, the Scottish Enlightenment tends to get short shrift. Except in specialized courses focused on the intellectual history of the 18th century at the few institutions ...
The Straggler

Sad, Bad, Mad

Scowling out at me from my New York Post is Steven Hayes, recently convicted of an exceptionally vile crime in my neighbor state of Connecticut. With another man, not yet ...


The Long View

Update to New York Times Stylebook

FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION TO: Editorial Staff FROM: Editorial Policy Committee RE: Election pieces, approved language Oct. 26, 2010 As you all know, Election Day is one week from now, and we know you’re all busy ...
Politics & Policy


LET SPRING BE SPRING (In Memory of Marianne Moore) Something waiting to be born,     The oak tree folded in the acorn, We might say, the felicity Of potential: an embarrassment of riches Takes a chance at ...

Tax-and-Beg Radio

The billboards for the local public-radio station say “NO RANT. NO SLANT.” That flatters the target audience nicely, eh? Unlike those wingnut stations where Rush Limbaugh speaks in tongues through ...
Politics & Policy


The Two Faces of Paul Krugman Stephen Spruiell’s characterization of Paul Krugman’s difficulties as an opinion journalist is compelling (“Professor Ahab,” October 18). As a graduate student at the University of Chicago, ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Vice President Biden said, twice, that conservatives have spent $200 billion on political ads. He meant $200 million. Explains a lot about the last two years. ‐ Barack Obama is ...

Most Popular


Elizabeth Warren Is Jussie Smollett

Elizabeth Warren has a moving story about being fired from a teaching job because she was pregnant, a story that perfectly complements her political narrative that she is the tribune and champion of those who have been treated unfairly by the powerful. Joe Biden has a moving — and horrifying — story about his ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Film & TV

Joker: An Honest Treatment of Madness

When I saw that the New York Times and The New Yorker had run columns berating the new Joker movie, criticizing it not simply on cinematic grounds but instead insisting that the film amounted to a clandestine defense of “whiteness” in an attempt to buttress the electoral aim of “Republicans” — this is a ... Read More

The Origins of the Transgender Movement

Editor’s Note: This article has been adapted from remarks delivered at a Heritage Foundation summit. I’ve been asked to talk about the origins of transgenderism and how it relates to children and their exploitation. But first, I would like to start with a little story. Yesterday I was wandering around ... Read More