Magazine | May 2, 2011, Issue

A Just War

Moral Combat: Good and Evil in World War II, by Michael Burleigh (Harper, 672 pp., $29.99)

World War II has always been presented as “a good war” from the point of view of the Allies, who strove to destroy the undeniably great evil of Fascism, but was it? A number of revisionist historians have attempted in recent years to portray the Allied destruction of Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki as being morally equivalent to the Nazi and Japanese atrocities, with the intent of arraigning Western leaders such as Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill as war criminals. Scarcely a month goes by without another attempt of this nature, and they rarely fail to find sympathetic reviewers in the liberal press.

Very recently, a highly tendentious and factually flawed book about the Bengal Famine of 1943 — Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India During World War II, by Madhusree Mukerjee, which seeks to blame Churchill personally for the deliberate starvation of 3 million Indians — received a positive review in the New York Review of Books; and a New York Times review of another recent book about Churchill argued that he used poison gas against the Iraqis in the 1920s, when every scholar of the period knows it was actually tear gas that he was proposing to use. If Churchill were alive today he would garner millions of dollars in libel settlements alone, from writers who are too lazy or politically biased to go to the serious and substantial works of history on the subject. 

One of these serious and substantial works is Michael Burleigh’s magisterial Moral Combat, which examines in detail the ethics of the entire conflict — from Hitler’s invasion of Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, to Japan’s surrender six years later. With wit, incisive analysis, and the certainty of a moral philosopher who has spent half a lifetime examining this subject, Burleigh utterly skewers the moral equivalists, and effectively closes down the argument. He proves beyond any but the weirdest conspiracy theorist’s doubt that the Western Allies fought the war according to a far higher moral code than the Axis, and there is simply no need to indulge in the tortured mea culpa that self-hating Americans and Britons have so long and so noisily been prescribing for us.

Far from being a dry theological tome, this book is full of surprising aperçus, exquisite pen portraits, and even jokes, which might not be expected considering the subject matter.  Burleigh has the enviable ability to get to the core of an issue or personality, and to furnish us with precisely those little details that illuminate it perfectly. “Despite all the high-minded babble about German Kultur,” he writes, for example, “the realities of occupation were grimly sordid: drunkenness, inter-service brawling, brutality, rape, graft, extortion and theft being the everyday norm, along with some starving girl hitching her skirts in a dark alley in return for a half-loaf of bread.”

To illustrate the monstrous narcissism of Hans Frank, the Nazi governor-general of Poland, Burleigh focuses on the manner in which he “cast himself in the leading role in his own historical pageant”:

Mimicking royalty, whenever Frank was in residence in his castle the swastika billowed overhead. . . . His photograph hung in every room opposite where he sat, and he liked to hand out autographed copies to his guests. . . . He dispensed cigars from luxury humidors on which his castle was depicted. Trumpet blasts greeted his birthday mornings. In addition to dozens of uniforms, adorned with all his insignia and medals, Frank had 120 suits. A red carpet was to be unrolled wherever he trod.

#page#As for Frau Brigitte Frank: “Throughout her sojourn in Poland, she would roll up at furriers in the Jewish ghettos, where, leaving her youngest son to stick his tongue out at starving Jewish children from behind the car window, she would strike very hard bargains with the proprietors.” This is history writing at its best.

As well as covering the obvious issues regarding occupation, resistance, area bombing, the Holocaust, and so on, Burleigh examines those aspects of the war that are often skipped over, such as Soviet anti-Semitism even as the death camps were being liberated, or the 15 million Chinese who died — that’s over half as many as the Russians lost, but they have received only a fraction of the historical coverage — and the conventional bombing of Japanese cities, which killed far more than the atomic bombs. He deploys statistics superbly to illuminate the controversies. (For example, only 7,000 people joined the Free French in 1940, in defiance of Vichy’s poster of Marshal Pétain that asked: “Are you more of a Frenchman than him?”)

Burleigh takes strong stances on almost every controversy of the war, writing of “the central role of Emperor Hirohito” and “the false SS-Army dichotomy.” One sub-chapter about the U.S. Army Air Forces’ bombing of Japan is titled “Had to Be Done.” Only once does he write, “This author neither approves nor disapproves of this development,” and that is apropos of the way in which, in post-war conflicts, human-rights lawyers and the media have effectively become an independent non-combatant arm. Yet even there it isn’t hard to discern disapproval.

The chapter covering the work of the SS Einsatzgruppen (death squads) in Poland and Russia emphasizes how the Nazis did not attempt to abolish the concept of morality altogether so much as try to erect a competing sense of Aryan morality above the Judeo-Christian one. At SS training schools, the common denominator for selection was involvement in neo-fascist activities even in peacetime, for as Burleigh puts it: “These were the missionary elite of National Socialism, with a dualistic view of the world and no vestiges of the Christian upbringing or humanistic education many of them had passed through before acquiring a more compelling and narrower set of values.” Toughness and loyalty were prized above all other human virtues, with the result that “their signature approach to pacification was to hang people from lamp-posts.”

Since the Combined Bomber Offensive, undertaken by the RAF’s Bomber Command Wing and the USAAF against German-occupied Europe, is often presented as the most morally questionable aspect of the Allied war effort, Burleigh covers this issue in penetrating detail. He concludes, of the philosophical argument that the offensive was morally comparable to the Holocaust, that “no serious person can compare the hard-fought bombing campaign with slaughtering innocent civilians in circumstances where the only risk the perpetrators ran was to be splashed with blood and brains in some ditch in the Ukraine.”

The motto of the 44th (Rhodesia) squadron of the RAF’s 5th Bomber Group — the first squadron to fly the Avro Lancaster — was “The King’s thunderbolts are righteous,” and that is Burleigh’s conclusion too. At one point he describes the 55,000 volunteers who died in Bomber Command operations as “heroes,” a refreshing value judgment to find in a serious work of history. Burleigh emphasizes that if the Nazis had evacuated non-essential people from their cities, the death toll would have been much reduced, that it is easy to underestimate how much fight the Germans still had left in them even though their cause was objectively lost, and that “the Allied aim was to destroy military and industrial targets, their workforces included, to defeat an evil system that enjoyed overwhelming popular support.” Nor does he have much truck with the traducing of personalities such as Sir Arthur “Bomber” Harris and his American counterpart Curtis LeMay, whom he presents as far more complicated figures than their caricatures.

#page#As for Dresden, the high death toll of over 25,000 — though nothing like the six-figure one claimed by Joseph Goebbels and David Irving — came not as a result of deliberate Allied policy so much as a number of accidental factors. Dresden was one heavy raid among a whole, deadly sequence of massive raids, but for various unpredictable reasons — wind, weather, lack of defenses, and, above all, shocking deficiencies in air-raid protection for the general population — it suffered the worst. When the Nazi gauleiter of Dresden, Martin Mutschmann, fell into Allied hands, he quickly confessed that “a shelter-building program for the entire city was not carried out,” since “I kept hoping that nothing would happen to Dresden.” (He had a shelter built for himself, his family, and his senior officials, however.)

Quite why Mutschmann thought that, alone of large German cities, Dresden should have been immune to Allied bombing is a mystery, because it was a nodal point in the region. Large railway marshalling yards were situated there, as well as a conglomeration of war industries, particularly in the vital optics, electronics, and communications fields. And the bombing worked politically: The respected German historian Götz Bergander believes that whereas before Dresden the concept of accepting unconditional surrender was considered unthinkable by ordinary Germans, “the shock of Dresden contributed in a fundamental way to a change of heart.” The attack on Dresden was proportionately less deadly than those on places such as Pforzheim and Würzburg, but Dresden’s architectural beauty was undeniable. Nor has anyone ever denied the horror of what happened there on the night of Feb. 13, 1945; the thousand-degree heat from the firestorm could be felt by the RAF aircrew at more than 10,000 feet above the city. But brave men such as Mike Tripp and Bruce Wyllie of Bomber Command and Alden “Al” Rigby of the USAAF attacked a functioning enemy administrative, industrial, and communications center that by February 1945 lay close to the front line. They did what they had to do.

Similarly, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are ably defended by Burleigh on ethical grounds, although he does quote LeMay as saying: “We just weren’t bothered about the morality of the question. If we could shorten the war, we wanted to shorten it.” Burleigh does bother himself about the morality, however, and comes to the following conclusion: “The U.S. could have simply continued the conventional bombing of Japan, which had already caused 30 times the devastation of the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, though without the long-term radiological harm to the population. How many that would have killed can be surmised, although the survivors would not have been dying from obscure cancers decades after the event.”

We learn that when the Enola Gay B-29 bomber — whose somewhat incongruous call sign was “Dimples Eight Two” — dropped the bomb on Hiroshima, there were 43,000 Japanese soldiers stationed below as well as the 280,000 civilians, and that the weather was a balmy 27 Celsius, just before “the city was blasted with a light momentarily brighter than several suns.” One man who survived Hiroshima went home to Nagasaki, and then astonishingly survived that too.   

This book is full of poignant nuggets of information — on the day Mussolini left his villa for the last time, for example, his 18-year-old pianist son Romano played Duke Ellington’s “Saddest Tale” in an upstairs room — but easily its greatest strength lies in the wise, civilized, but unshakeable moral certainty of its author. When next you hear someone argue that Dresden or Hiroshima was on the same moral plane as the Holocaust or the Bataan Death March, this is the book to show him. It should reshape the entire terms of the debate back in the Western Allies’ favor. Moral equivalism, which is encroaching into the study of history despite having nothing whatever to contribute to it, clearly has a doughty foe in Michael Burleigh.

– Mr. Roberts’s The Storm of War: A New History of World War Two will be published by HarperCollins in May.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

President Me

Here’s how to keep track of the top two contenders, according to a recent CNN poll, for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination: Only one of them has his own signature ...
Politics & Policy

A Victory — and a Warning

Conservatives are right to cheer Wisconsin supreme-court justice David Prosser’s apparent reelection, but it’s worth looking closely at the results. While his victory was encouraging, Prosser won only because turnout ...
Politics & Policy

Trial by Fire

The greatest advocate of book-burning in history was probably the skeptical philosopher David Hume. In his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, he wrote: “If we take in our hand any volume; ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Blame the Not-Too-Rich

It is widely understood that the American middle class has fuzzy boundaries. Many relatively poor and relatively rich people identify as middle-class. In an ambitious 2008 survey, the Pew Research ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Shadow Fights

No temptation seems more irresistible to film critics than the pithy summation of a decade in movies. Ask a critic about a cinematic year and you’ll get a top-ten list. ...
City Desk

Cool Tombs

Buying a coffin is nobody’s idea of shopping, a friend of mine once said. I would certainly rather go to a yard sale or to Etro or even to the ...
Politics & Policy

A Just War

World War II has always been presented as “a good war” from the point of view of the Allies, who strove to destroy the undeniably great evil of Fascism, but ...
Politics & Policy

Eastern Light

I used to attend regularly at an office of the New York City government to transact some business with a very pleasant young female African-American city employee. On the wall ...
Politics & Policy

The People’s Military

Paradoxically, the post–Cold War “unipolar moment” of American power has also been a period of constant crisis in American civil-military relations. Even Operation Desert Storm, now romanticized as a golden ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

Rebutting Garfinkle The premise of Adam Garfinkle’s review of Donald Rumsfeld’s memoir Known and Unknown (April 4, 2011) is that Rumsfeld evades responsibility for large matters that did not go well ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ You know, we miss the days when he was anonymous, too. ‐ President Obama officially launched his reelection bid. He owed his win in 2008 to five factors. He was ...
The Long View

To: Archives, From: West Wing Staff

  TO: Archives FROM: West Wing Staff RE: Attached notes Please file these contemporaneous notes of the latest budget negotiations. Marked CLOSE HOLD. Thank you. Meeting begins. Present: POTUS, Speaker of the House, Mr. Plouffe, others. POTUS begins ...
The Bent Pin

The Late Liz, Upstaged

She Married the Men She Slept With, She Slept with the Men She Married, and All of Her Children Had Surnames . . .  As epitaphs for Elizabeth Taylor go, this captures the instinctive ...
Athwart

Dreams of My Carwash

In a recent issue of Vogue, actress Reese Witherspoon says she sits in her car and cries sometimes, because she misses her privacy. In a recent interview with Hearst Newspapers, ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

HE MAKES HIS MARK for Nathaniel Back when only holy men could write, The farmer or squire who signed himself With the letter X, St. Andrew’s cross, Would bow and put his lips to it, Reverently, ...
Happy Warrior

Line Items

‘It’s Back!”        So goes Walmart’s new slogan. What they mean is the old Walmart is back — “Everyday low prices!” — and their disastrous attempt to evolve into Goremart — ...

Most Popular

Culture

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More
Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More