Magazine | April 18, 2011, Issue

TR’s Goal-Line Stand

The Big Scrum: How Teddy Roosevelt Saved Football, by John J. Miller (Harper, 272 pp., $25.99)

Baseball may still try to market itself as our national pastime, but there’s little doubt that football is our national passion. By any measurement, the popularity of college and professional football is staggering. Teams in the NCAA and NFL reap billions of dollars in TV revenue; billions more are wagered legally and illegally; and NCAA schools drew more than 48 million spectators in 2009, while the NFL attracted another 17 million.

Given those numbers, it’s hard to believe that, little more than a hundred years ago, at the dawn of the Progressive movement, there was a concerted effort to ban the sport. The violence and brutality that made serious injury common (resulting, sometimes, even in death) sparked a crusade that very nearly killed football in its infancy.

In longtime NR writer John J. Miller’s new book, The Big Scrum, the battle between Progressive reformers and the defenders of the game is played out on a series of separate tracks that finally merge at a “football summit” in October 1905, in Pres. Theodore Roosevelt’s White House. Although even Miller admits that his subtitle — “How Teddy Roosevelt Saved Football” — might overstate the case a bit, he leaves little room for doubt that TR’s advocacy of the sport, and his recognition that the rules had to change in order to save it, helped preserve the game and set the stage for its explosive growth. It’s not difficult to imagine that without his intercession, football today — if it existed at all — might find itself in the sporting public’s consciousness somewhere between indoor soccer and cockfighting.

Miller writes about college football enthusiastically and eloquently — not as mere games, but as “cultural rituals of deep significance.” Though he knows the sport only as a spectator, it’s obvious he bleeds the maize and blue of the University of Michigan. As a young boy, he’s taught by his father to sing the Wolverine fight song, “Hail to the Victors,” and he meets his wife on his way to Michigan Stadium. For his fellow football lovers, The Big Scrum provides a fascinating, detailed look at a nearly forgotten chapter that could easily have robbed them of a tradition that provides so many touchstones in their lives. But, even for those who prefer pigskin to remain on pigs, the book’s vivid character portraits entertainingly recreate a time in America when the forces of Progressivism were attempting to reshape the nation. Miller cites a 1903 editorial from the reliably shrill New York Times, of which the headline, “Two Curable Evils,” best sums up the decibel level. One evil was the lynching of blacks. The other was football.

Football began in earnest not long after the Civil War, as a variation of rugby played primarily by young college men. The game — marked by “scrums” (masses of athletes pushing and shoving) — was brutal, and the rules were, to say the least, unsettled, usually decided by the two teams just before each contest. It was touted as a physical activity that would improve a student’s mind and character, but players were not above gouging an eye or snapping a bone while writhing within a tangle of bodies on a muddy field (while wearing no helmets or other protective equipment). The violence and resultant injuries attracted the attention of reformers who saw the risks as unacceptable. For many progressives, abolishing football became as important as instituting an income tax.

At first glance, Theodore Roosevelt seems an unlikely champion of football, as Miller introduces us to a young, frail, sickly boy nicknamed “Teedie” who battles everything from asthma to seasickness. However, after his father confronts him in a fateful — and possibly apocryphal — meeting, at which the elder Roosevelt reportedly announces, “You must make your body. It is hard drudgery to make one’s body, but I know you will do it,” he begins a grueling regimen and develops a growing appreciation for what he comes to call “the doctrine of the strenuous life.” Indeed, once the assassination of William McKinley thrusts Roosevelt into the White House, he takes pains to conceal the extent of his physical activity, fearing Americans might not approve of such a “sporting president.”

#page#We also come to know Walter Chauncey Camp, a player, coach, and sportswriter known as the “father of American football,” who participates in the summit; E. L. Godkin, influential editor of The Nation, who campaigns passionately for the abolition of the game; and Charles W. Eliot, who serves as Harvard’s president for 40 years and is an outspoken opponent of college football. When Eliot, pushing for outright prohibition, claims that no sport can be honorable if it embraces “the barbarous ethics of warfare,” Roosevelt (a Harvard alumnus) shoots back, “I think Harvard will be doing the baby act if she takes any such foolish course as President Eliot advises.”

Infantilism vs. manhood aside, some opponents of football worried the game was damaging to young men’s morals in that it encouraged, and even glorified, cheating and bad sportsmanship. On that point, even TR was forced to agree. Miller writes of a 1905 Harvard-alumni-dinner speech at which President Roosevelt, addressing the growing outrage over football violence, warned, “When the injuries are inflicted by others, either wantonly or of set design, we are confronted by the question not of damage to one man’s body, but of damage to the other man’s character.” The outcry had reached a critical mass, and Roosevelt, champion of Progressives but defender of football, knew he had to act.

Later that year, at his “football summit” with major college coaches, he opens one meeting with a stark assessment: “Football is on trial.” Out of that summit came recommendations for an increased focus on sportsmanship, as well as equipment and rules changes (the most important of which was the forward pass, which opened up the game and reduced the number of injury-producing scrums). While the summit didn’t end the controversy over football, it did dampen the cries for its abolition, thereby buying some time. As the changes in the rules and improvements in equipment had their intended effect, the sport’s popularity continued to grow. There were further efforts to ban football when well-publicized deaths or injuries occurred in subsequent years, but Roosevelt never again insinuated himself into the debate as he had in 1905.

Miller brings life to an era we normally see only through grainy black-and-white film. And, while there’s enough football action and information to please the most fanatical gridiron fan, he avoids getting bogged down in football jargon. Instead, he uses the sport as a window into a tumultuous time in U.S. history. The fact is that much of the debate in the Progressive era remains relevant to today’s Washington, as political leaders have their own scrums over basic philosophical issues. Miller also manages to infuse The Big Scrum with drama and tension, even though the eventual outcome is known to all. After all, football has thrived on the college and professional level to a degree neither Teddy Roosevelt nor any of his contemporaries could have imagined.

Still, the controversy over its violence continues. The NCAA and NFL struggle to address ongoing concerns over injuries as athletes become larger, stronger, and faster. New rules are instituted annually in an attempt to make the game safer for its players, most recently in the area of helmet-to-helmet contact. But no matter how these safety issues work themselves out, football will continue to be played. If the Progressives couldn’t knock it out of bounds, who can?

– Mr. Sajak, the host of Wheel of Fortune, spent several years as host of a baseball show on MLB Radio.

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Replacement Plan

On health care, Republicans have unified behind a slogan rather than a policy. The slogan, “repeal and replace,” describes what they want to do to the Democrats’ health-care law, also ...


Politics & Policy

Tocqueville and the Tube

Television makes us fat, lazy, inattentive, unsociable, mistrustful, materialistic — and unhappy about all of that. It cheapens political discourse, weakens family ties, prevents face-to-face socializing, and exposes kids to ...
Politics & Policy


President Obama’s use of military force in Libya has come under intense criticism across the American political spectrum. There is widespread disagreement over what U.S. objectives should be, and many ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Light of the World

If the Vatican Observatory were to begin broadcasting Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence–style signals into space, and the Catholic Church went looking for a single story capable of introducing to an ...
The Straggler

Decline and Fall

There is a school of psychology called Situationism that pooh-poohs the notion of individual character. This line of thought began with some experiments by Stanley Milgram of Yale in the ...
Politics & Policy

The Parent Trap

When Andrew Ferguson attended Occidental College in the 1970s, colleges were already moving away from fussy old requirements like American history, English composition, and foreign languages, and towards the anything-goes ...
Politics & Policy

TR’s Goal-Line Stand

Baseball may still try to market itself as our national pastime, but there’s little doubt that football is our national passion. By any measurement, the popularity of college and professional ...


Politics & Policy


Who Will Review the Judicial Reviewers? In his reply to Pamela K. Grow’s letter concerning nullification, Allen C. Guelzo states, correctly, “If the founders had wanted to grant nullifying power — ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ To be fair, Obama is right: Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Congress has to declare kinetic military action. ‐ The Congressional Budget Office released an analysis of ...
The Long View

NSA Document Extract

NSA Document Extract POTUS Secured Communications 03.24.11 09:33EDT Begin Extract Static. Ringing. Unidentified Male Voice: Hello? POTUS: Mr. President? It’s Barack Obama. UMV: Well hey. Hey! Barack Obama. Lemme just — Barb, can you turn that down? ...
Politics & Policy


WINDOW SHOPPER’S IVORY The grand and opulent curve – the tusk from a beast long gone; now observed held firm, upon its dark, exotic wooden base. At first glance, the surface appears merely uneven; but a ...
Happy Warrior

Esprit de l’Escalier

Wandering round this great republic predicting the apocalypse, I’m often asked by audience members why it is I’m being quite so overwrought if not an hysterical old queen about the ...

Most Popular

Film & TV

The Manly Appeal of Ford v Ferrari

There used to be a lot of overlap between what we think of as a Hollywood studio picture (designed to earn money) and an awards movie (designed to fill the trophy case, usually with an accompanying loss of money). Ford v Ferrari is a glorious throwback to the era when big stars did quality movies about actual ... Read More
Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More