Magazine | October 31, 2011, Issue


Suicide Dissolution

In their argument against assisted suicide (“Western Suttee,” October 17), Diederik Boomsma and Jonathan Price claim that “a state recognizing an inalienable right to die could not be anything approaching a true community defined by mutual rights and duties” because this entails “fully negotiable relations to the political community,” because in such a community “citizenship is increasingly seen as a matter of rights without duties,” and because “the most basic duty to others — to remain alive within reason — is rejected.”

I confess to being unfamiliar with the philosophical arguments they cite — their view might well be Aristotle’s. But regardless of where it comes from, I do not find it convincing, and I wish they would elaborate.

It seems to me that the right to die poses no greater threat to a community than the right to leave the community for another reason does. When one leaves a community, whether by natural death, suicide, or emigration, the “mutual rights and duties” simply evaporate; from the community’s perspective, this means one less contributor, but also one less beneficiary. The community itself continues to function, and the rules — the balance between rights and duties — for those who remain in the community do not become “fully negotiable,” or typically change at all.

Bertrand Guns

St. Louis, Mo.


Diederik Boomsma and Jonathan Price reply: Even the decision to emigrate may not be as morally neutral as suggested by Mr. Guns. What if you leave behind a sick mother? Surely the duties of a husband or father do not simply “evaporate” by the individual’s choosing to leave. Would it be okay to emigrate at any time? After you get a mortgage? While in the army in a battle? In fact, there are laws against such irresponsible behavior. Would it be less irresponsible to leave by committing suicide, claiming a state-guaranteed right to die? In many cases, the decision may not be illegal but, nevertheless, be immoral.

It is true that, after death, the mutual rights and duties of a person de facto disappear. But the consequences of death — and suicide in this case — do not. It is a cliché but still true that no man is an island; he is dependent on countless others, towards whom he inescapably has positive duties. To think of society in terms of “contributors” and “beneficiaries” is to reduce the political community to merely an economic arrangement. There are differences between duties towards the family or community and towards the state, of both degree and kind. But if the state actively defends and champions the rights of individuals to die, that right affects and, in fact, erodes the mutual commitments that bind the community and family.

Private life is a separate sphere but not separable from public life. And to support such a “liberty” to die or be killed is to foster the illusion that society is a sea of free-floating individuals, that the ultimate freedom is freedom from consequences. Freedom, then, is — as Janis Joplin belted out — “just another word for nothing left to lose.”

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Quotin’ Obama

When an MSNBC commentator accuses someone of racism, it’s dog bites man. MSNBC is a Left-heavy channel; the Left can hardly talk without accusing others of racism. Last month, however, ...
Politics & Policy

Occupy Salem

So there were Hula Hoops, a composting station, facially pierced trustafarians eating quiche, 9/11 truthers and U.S.S. Liberty truthers, the Black Panther Party, a demand that you “define your aesthetic, ...
Politics & Policy

Action Report

‘I’d say it’s been quite considerable,” says Ed Feulner, “judging from both the friendly and critical calls that I hear on a routine basis from Capitol Hill.” Feulner, the longtime ...


Politics & Policy

The Storm-Calmer

Baton Rouge, La. — The Louisiana Democratic party has effectively conceded this year’s gubernatorial race. This does not mean merely that the party could not find a big-name challenger — ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

To Serve and Protect

In a New York Times obituary published a few days after his death earlier this year, William J. Stuntz’s onetime boss at Harvard Law School, Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, ...
Politics & Policy

A Left Fairy Tale

Near the midway point of The Ides of March, George Clooney’s handsome new movie about a fictional battle for the Democratic presidential nomination, I found myself trying to imagine the ...
The Straggler

Words, Words, Words

  The launching of a conservative weekly journal of opinion in a country widely assumed to be a bastion of conservatism at first glance looks like a work of supererogation, rather ...


Politics & Policy


Suicide Dissolution In their argument against assisted suicide (“Western Suttee,” October 17), Diederik Boomsma and Jonathan Price claim that “a state recognizing an inalienable right to die could not be anything ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ A bunch of obnoxious, freakish-looking people made a spectacle of themselves in downtown New York. You don’t say. ‐ “There is a tide in the affairs of men / Which ...
The Long View


RIDESHARES WANTED: Looking for chill, progressive person to share ride to #occupywallstreet protest in New York. Me: 28, inked, Ph.D. candidate in Modern French Outsider Fiction, progressive, smart, great conversationalist, diverse ...

Null, Spacy

Moving stones from one place to another is an ancient human pastime. For thousands of years, it’s all they had to do. You can build an astrological observatory with religious ...
Politics & Policy


HEAVEN AND EARTH Experience of life: its routines; the workaday world; home leisure, reassuring in their way, buttress our sense of life’s rational elements, its continuity upholding our need for a beginning, a middle, ...
Happy Warrior

Revolution, Inc.

You won’t be surprised to hear that Ben & Jerry’s, the hippie-dippy Vermont ice-cream makers, have come out in favor of “Occupy Wall Street.” Or as their press release puts ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More