Magazine | February 20, 2012, Issue

Letters

The Shame of FDR

While the basic argument of Daniel Foster’s “For Shame” (January 23) — that the stigma associated with receiving public assistance has eroded, to our detriment — is true and well proved by the examples he provides, the quotation he chose to illustrate FDR’s desire for ending government assistance correlates with neither the president’s true intentions nor the public words of his cabinet members.

Frances Perkins, FDR’s secretary of labor, who was charged with developing Social Security and selling it to the general population, did not sugar-coat her message. Instead, she stated in a radio address that Social Security sought to replicate the socialist welfare programs of Europe. “The task of recovery is inseparable from the fundamental task of social reconstruction,” Perkins further stated. She even paraphrased FDR as praising the “social insurances with which European countries have had a long and favorable experience.”

Furthermore, Secretary Perkins claimed that the United States was establishing more than just an insurance program: “The American program for economic security now before our Congress follows no single pattern. It is broader than social insurance, and does not attempt merely to copy a European model.”

Perhaps Foster should have excluded FDR and Social Security from his illustration of a more respectable time period in the American experience.

Mindy Reifer

Wesley Hills, N.Y.

 

Daniel Foster Replies: Ms. Reifer is quite right that Frances Perkins — one of only two cabinet members to serve through FDR’s entire tenure, the other being Harold Ickes — was a major architect of the contemporary American welfare state, which, if it does not (yet) encompass all the excesses of its European antecedents, nevertheless shares their basic assumptions.

The point of using the 1935 FDR quote (“The federal government must and shall quit this business of relief”) was not to suggest that the legacy of the New Deal was somehow accidental to its animating principles, but to illustrate that in 1935, at the height of the Depression, even FDR felt it necessary to present a rhetoric that recognized the average American’s belief that direct relief to the able-bodied was shameful. Remember, from roughly 1933 to 1936, the fate of the New Deal was in great doubt. Anti-Roosevelt conservative Democrats and Republicans had allied with groups such as the Liberty League (think the Tea Party 1.0) to challenge the Europeanization of America in the press, in the courts, and at the ballot box. Alas, they lost more often than they won. 

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Two Decades Too Late

For months, former senator Rick Santorum has been talking about working-class woes and promoting a working-class-friendly economic agenda, and in late January President Obama’s State of the Union speech placed ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Money Bawl

When the Federal Reserve decided to loosen monetary policy in September 2007, not many people criticized it. The vote was unanimous. Few congressmen said anything about the move. Three years ...

Books, Arts & Manners

City Desk

The Origin

Washington Crossing the Delaware, the city’s most popular painting, belongs to its largest museum. But for a while, in the last century, we didn’t quite know what to do with ...
Politics & Policy

The Joys of Action

My favorite moment in Contraband, a palate-cleansing little thriller that’s perfect for moviegoers sated by December’s buffet of prestige movies, comes just after Mark Wahlberg’s New Orleans super-smuggler, Chris Farraday, ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Poetry

‘HORSEMAN, PASS BY’ Over time, the bravado fades; the long quiet of death helps a silence, encouraged, to take on a weight its first appearance failed to suggest; but not as an albatross, or death prefigured, or ...
Happy Warrior

The Catholic State

So the Health Commissar, Kathleen Sebelius, has decided that, under Obamacare, religious institutions, like any other employer, will be required to offer their workers free contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients. Well, ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

The Shame of FDR While the basic argument of Daniel Foster’s “For Shame” (January 23) — that the stigma associated with receiving public assistance has eroded, to our detriment — is ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ We have to admit that President Obama’s line about not being consumed by personal ambition was pretty good. He should save it for volume three of his memoirs. ‐ To ...
Athwart

To Newtly Go

Count me with Newt if the issue’s the moon. We should have had a base up there by 2001, just like the one in the movie. Of course, if we ...

Most Popular

Culture

Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More
Immigration

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More
U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More