Magazine | March 5, 2012, Issue

The Central Plan

Our president has one, unfortunately

Conservatives recoiled when Barack Obama declared his desire to “spread the wealth,” the phrase being redolent of Johnsonian welfare-statism, and many on the right promptly denounced him as a “socialist.” But that is silly: Being a spread-the-wealther does not make one a socialist — it makes one a conventional politician in a modern liberal democracy (alas). Being a central planner makes one a socialist, socialism being the philosophy of imposing central planning on an economy in place of markets, and it is on that count that President Obama may be indicted and convicted of practicing the dark arts of socialism. From his hallmark health-care legislation to his broader economic philosophy, President Obama is the most committed central planner to occupy the Oval Office since Woodrow Wilson.

There are two species of central planner: the authoritarian and the progressive. Each species has its distinctive markings and characteristic habits: The markings of the authoritarian central planner are epaulets and a peaked cap, and generally some braid about the shoulders, and his distinctive habit is putting his boot on your face (forever). The progressive species is generally to be found in blue suits talking jabberwocky in front of joint sessions of Congress. Obama is a specimen of this latter type, though the two species share a preoccupation with quantifiable economic abstractions divorced from real-world economic activity. The presence of figures is soothing to the central planner, as it enables him to present to the public as science (remember Friedrich Engels and his “scientific socialism”) what is in fact merely political occultism. It is for this reason that Barack Obama’s forceful economic declarations — exports shall be x! unemployment shall be y! — are to conservative ears indistinguishable from those found in the five-year plans of various single-party states — the wheat crop shall be x! the potato harvest shall be y!

It is important for the central planner that these figures be carefully insulated from real economic activity. President Obama, in his 2010 State of the Union speech, boldly promised to double U.S. exports in five years. This is the sort of thing that sounds impossibly audacious and visionary, until you think about it for a second. (Fortunately for President Obama, “think about it for a second” does not describe the usual habits of the American voter.) When Barack Obama was elected in 2008, U.S. exports were growing at a rate of 12 percent annually, meaning that, in nominal terms, they would have doubled in just under six years if the current trend simply had continued. In fact, export growth already was likely to pick up beyond that as high levels of demand in Asia and elsewhere drove up prices for important U.S. exports such as agricultural products, chemicals, and industrial components. President Obama was promising only to achieve that which was going to happen anyway. The purpose of his trade initiative was not to increase trade, but to impose his political will on the economy.

Vice President Joe Biden had some months earlier provided an indicator of what that vision looks like: electric cars. Never mind that the market for electric cars is minuscule, that the better ones cost as much as Maseratis, that the underlying technology remains insufficient to the transportation needs of most commuters: We are to have electric cars, because the central planners say so. The poor Russians didn’t need a bunch of sausages made out of toilet paper (sobachya radost) either. National economic policy may be hostage to the president’s love of The Jetsons, but reducing the trade deficit provides the economic rationale for imposing politics on the markets. During a speech at Fisker Automotive, a manufacturer of high-end luxury electric sports coupes, Vice President Biden dared to dream: “Imagine a world where people pop the hood of their cars, and they see stamped on the battery ‘Made in America.’” After receiving a half-billion dollars in support from the U.S. government, Fisker had the bad taste to lay off many of its U.S. workers — in Biden’s home state, Delaware — and stamp its cars “Made in Finland,” where it began manufacturing.

#page#That means, of course, that Fisker sales will contribute to the U.S. trade deficit rather than reduce it, and the trade deficit is a great quantifiable abstraction that sends progressive central planners into fits. So bothered by the trade deficit is President Obama that he seeks to impose his political will not only on the U.S. economy but also on the Chinese economy, demanding that Beijing revise its monetary policy and its trade rules to favor American exports. If they hadn’t been paralyzed with laughter, the central planners in China might have pointed out to President Obama that the single largest contributor to the U.S. trade deficit is not cheap Chinese manufactured goods but a single non-Chinese commodity: oil, which accounts for one half of the deficit. As it happens, the Obama administration has been busily undermining domestic energy production in the United States, because its central-planning manifesto says that the U.S. economy should cease to run on petroleum and begin to run on other forms of energy: wind, hydro, geothermal — air, water, and earth being the favored elements, fire being in the political doghouse. (Like I said: occultism.) In his latest budget proposal, President Obama proposes to continue offering tax benefits to U.S. manufacturers in the hope of increasing exports, but he intends to exclude from that benefit energy firms — which just happen to be positioned to export a great deal of natural gas to a world market hungry for the stuff, with Japanese demand particularly acute as the country transitions away from nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

So we are to double our exports, which were going to double anyway, but we’re to do so by favoring goods that nobody wants and that are not made here (Fisker) over goods that are made here that everybody wants (petroleum) and that just happen to fall into the category of goods that represent the majority of our trade deficit. There are no competent economic central planners, but there is a spectrum of incompetency, and the Obama administration is in the wrong end of it. They are the sort of central planners for whom one wants to organize a telethon.

The administration’s central-planning impulse was most strongly displayed in the drafting of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was prefaced by a sober-mouthed national debate about another set of quantifiable abstractions: the number of uninsured Americans (45.7 million!), the trajectory of health-care costs (up!), the share of GDP dedicated to medicine (more than the Swiss!), etc. Again, the abstractions must be carefully separated from the realities. Of those 45.7 million uninsured Americans, a lot were not uninsured (they were covered by Medicaid, CHIP, and similar programs) and many were not Americans (non-citizens were counted). Some were rich people who didn’t need or want insurance (Bill Gates can just pay his doctor). Etc. Keith Hennessey, former director of the National Economic Council, calculated that the actual number of Americans who were uninsured because they could not afford insurance was 10.6 million. The average cost of an insurance policy for a single person in 2011 was $5,429, meaning that we could have just bought insurance for all those uninsured for about $58 billion a year. The Obama administration says PPACA will cost about $93 billion a year, not quite twice what it would cost to just buy people insurance, whereas former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin calculates that the program will end up costing about $893 billion a year, or 15 times what it would cost to just buy people insurance. But Obama is not a spread-the-wealther — he’s a central planner. He does not want to buy Americans insurance — he wants to dictate that the insurance cover this situation in that way for this cost under those conditions, with abortifacients sprinkled over the entire mess for good measure. He does not desire to stimulate the economy, but to stimulate this sector of the economy in that way to achieve these outcomes for those cronies. (No? You explain Solyndra, then.)

When President Johnson signed the Food Stamp Act of 1964, he was just spreading the wealth. Obama wants to take over the farm.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

The Central Plan

Conservatives recoiled when Barack Obama declared his desire to “spread the wealth,” the phrase being redolent of Johnsonian welfare-statism, and many on the right promptly denounced him as a “socialist.” ...
Politics & Policy

God Save Her

February marks a truly historic moment in Britain: the 60th anniversary of the accession to the throne of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. It’s only the second diamond jubilee in ...
Politics & Policy

How Rick Runs

Rick Santorum has lost only one race in his long political career, and the loss made him a better candidate. The conservative movement has not definitively won a single race ...

Features

Politics & Policy

The Church of Big Government

Discussing the constitutionality of Obamacare’s “preventive health” measures on MSNBC, Melinda Henneberger of the Washington Post told Chris Matthews that she reasons thus with her liberal friends: “Maybe the Founders ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Facing History

David Satter has written two books that uneasily coexist under the same cover. The first is a welcome, if inadequately balanced, account of the failure of post-Communist Russia to come ...
Politics & Policy

Evident Truths

‘Faith is a very, very important part of my life,” said Rick Santorum in a recent Republican presidential debate in Florida, “but it’s a very, very important part of this ...
Politics & Policy

Pale Shadows

Last issue, I sang the praises of Contraband, an unassuming but well-crafted piece of genre entertainment. I was hoping to do the same this time with The Woman in Black, ...
The Straggler

O Valiant Hearts

Here is a story from World War II. The place is the island of Crete; the date, May 1941. The Wehrmacht was busily occupying Greece. The British expeditionary force in ...
Politics & Policy

Why Like Ike?

At the end of this new biography of Dwight Eisenhower, the author quotes Ike’s grandson David asking Mamie Eisenhower whether she had really known her husband. “I’m not sure anyone ...

Sections

The Bent Pin

Something Ere the End

As a believer in writing a good lede, I should begin this column with a light-hearted description of the so-called farewell concerts of Sir Harry Lauder and Anna Russell that ...
Athwart

Disease Progress

A previously respected blogger who now specializes in turning mush into froth warned of a “misogynist” plot by the GOP, bent on returning women to the “Dark Ages.” Chastity belts? ...
The Long View

Memorandum

TO:  All Romney 2012 Campaign Volunteers FROM:  Campaign Communications RE:  Guidelines for Telephone Canvassing Dear Volunteers: Thanks to all for your hard work these past few weeks! We’re in the home stretch, and it’s ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

ROOFING Lapping each course in record two-four time, The three-tab shingles overran the roof Above, as hammer blows rained down hard rhyme To render what was overhead sure proof Against the elements. Three workers struck, Their ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

On Thatcher’s ‘Defeat’ Near the end of John O’Sullivan’s review of the new Margaret Thatcher biopic (“The Lioness in Winter,” January 23), I was struck by the reference to “her defeat ...

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More