Magazine | June 11, 2012, Issue

The Scholar

Notes on a Century: Reflections of a Middle East Historian, by Bernard Lewis with Buntzie Ellis Churchill (Viking, 400 pp., $28.95)

Bernard Lewis is far and away the single most influential commentator in the English language on the Muslim world past and present. In the course of a long lifetime, he has published books of general political and historical interest, monographs that are the last word on some aspects of Islam, and innumerable articles in learned journals or the press. His affinity for all things Muslim is unmistakable, and survives the growing perception that the Middle East is the stage of a drama that may not end well. Publicly a Princeton professor emeritus, privately he was welcome in the Bush-Cheney White House, and he is known to have contributed to policy on Iraq at this level.

Notes on a Century, then, is the autobiography of a scholar whose researches have unexpectedly found their way into vital issues of the day. Easy to read, completely free from jargon, the book has the cheerful conversational fizz of someone able to give a good account of himself. He dearly loves anything funny. Going out of his way to have a laugh, he recalls that a lady from New York, obliged to state her religion on a form for Muslim officials, put, “Seventh Avenue Adventist”; and “Kuwaitus interruptus” is the pun he coined after the first Gulf war against Saddam Hussein. Saudi Arabia goes to lengths to exclude Jews, and the racist King Faisal could not resist telling Henry Kissinger, secretary of state at the time, that he was receiving him as a human being. Lewis quotes with relish Kissinger’s retort: “Some of my best friends are human beings.” At a conference in Rome, he recounts, a Soviet historian was asked whether historians should try to predict the future. “In the Soviet Union,” the historian replied, referring to Communist rewriting of history, “the most difficult task of the historian is to predict the past.” On another occasion, Lewis overheard a Turkish general explaining that the trouble with having Americans as allies is that you never know “when they will stab themselves in the back.”

Born in Britain in 1916 into a Jewish family, Bernard Lewis had the distinct advantage of growing up fluent in Hebrew. Knowledge of that language has been the point of departure in the careers of the significant number of Jews who have distinguished themselves as Orientalists. As a teenager on a visit to Carlsbad, the Czech spa, he was taken to meet Nahman Bialik, the great Jewish-nationalist poet who wrote in Hebrew and helped to revive what had been a dead language. One of his treasured possessions, Lewis is proud to reveal, is a signed copy of one of Bialik’s books. As a schoolboy he learned French and wrote a poem in Latin against Hitler. His father, a businessman in textiles, liked to sing arias from operas, and the attentive Lewis soon added Italian to his portfolio of languages.

#page#When he set out as a young man in the 1930s to study and teach Arab history, he says, all he could expect were “musty archives and academic conferences.” At the School of Oriental Studies in London he learned Arabic. Sir Hamilton Gibb at Oxford and Louis Massignon in Paris, both eminent Orientalists in their day, directed him towards medieval Islam, intending him to become a conventional student of conventional subjects. Even thoughtful people then took it for granted that, whatever Arabs and Muslims might or might not be doing in the present, they were not fully masters of their fate and therefore of interest only to specialists. Lewis could perfectly well have turned out to be just another such specialist unknown outside the university. Picking up Russian, Turkish, and Farsi without apparent difficulty, he prepared himself for greater things.

Linguistic skills were vital during World War II. In the whole of England, Lewis surmises, probably fewer than a hundred people knew Arabic. Recruited into MI-6, the branch of the British secret service dealing with foreign intelligence, Lewis had to translate or summarize texts in Arabic, some of them in code or cipher. His onetime boss, a major, made a comment on his file that showed he had the measure of one important facet of this unlikely subordinate: “His sense of humour should not be taken as seditious.” Although still today under oath not to reveal secrets, Lewis nevertheless reports a few newsworthy items, for instance that British intelligence was bugging the Saudi embassy in Vichy France.

In the aftermath of the war, Lewis traveled and made friends in Egypt, Iraq, and what for a short while longer was still the British Mandate of Palestine. At the time of his first visit to Iran, there was no piped water in Tehran and he had to be granted access to a spring at the British embassy. In Turkey in 1949, he was the first Westerner given permission to read in the Ottoman archives and so accumulated material for studies — sometimes written decades later — on subjects as controversial as race, slavery, and color in Islam. His tone is invariably judicious, even when addressing something as painful as Muslim anti-Semitism.

As the deadlock of the Cold War settled in place half a century ago, Lewis was already predicting the repetitive violence and confusion that would spread throughout the Middle East. Some put the blame for this exclusively on the United States and the Soviet Union, as both superpowers were pressuring Arab-nationalist leaders of that moment into alliances and policies that served their interests at the expense of the Arab masses. Lewis had the different insight that what might look like an ideological clash was more profoundly civilizational. Muslims had discovered the West only to misunderstand and misrepresent it. Their longstanding cultural and intellectual failure to modernize has left the legacy of a severe identity crisis, for which they and everyone else will be paying for a long time to come. Short of revolution, the sole possible protest open to Arabs on the streets has been seditious humor of the kind Lewis himself used to practice, and he has a special delight in jokes about Gamal Abdel Nasser, the windiest and most unrealistic of nationalists.

#page#The great and the good soon recognized that they had a lot to learn from Lewis, and he gossips most enjoyably about high-life encounters. There he was at a ceremonial dinner in Tehran given to honor Senator Edward Kennedy when the host, the shah of Iran — in a deliberate snub — did not turn up. At a lunch in Buckingham Palace, he was asked to interpret for British and Arab royalty. Pope John Paul II invited him to annual highbrow get-togethers in his country residence at Castel Gandolfo outside Rome, and Moammar Qaddafi flew him out to Libya for 48 hours of political and personal slapstick. In England, before emigrating to Israel, Abba Eban asked Lewis whether Eban’s style of speaking might suit the House of Commons. No, Lewis answered, the House of Lords. An admired friend was Muhammad Shafiq, prime minister of Afghanistan, hanged after the Soviet invasion of his country. One of Lewis’s graduate students was a Palestinian who had spent World War II in Berlin, and afterwards he, too, was hanged, for shooting King Abdullah of Jordan.

In more than one chapter Lewis gives professional advice about writing history. Freedom of expression and the exchange of ideas, he says, have an absolute value. The inflexible rule is to follow the evidence wherever it leads, even or especially if that means rejecting some prior hypothesis or exposing wrongdoing on the part of one’s own nation or some of its representatives. That was really the core of Lewis’s celebrated controversy with Edward Said. As the foremost spokesman of Palestinian nationalism, Said was unable or unwilling to consider that he or his people could act self-destructively. This meant that Jews were held responsible for the plight of the Palestinians. Singling out Lewis partly because of his reputation and partly because he was Jewish, Said concocted a syllogism: Lewis is an Orientalist; by definition Orientalists are at the service of imperialism and this is bad; therefore Lewis is at the service of imperialism and bad. Pure and simple tribalism of this kind carries the unspoken charges that a Jew has no right to an opinion about anything to do with Muslims and that Israel is an imperialist creation with no right to exist.

The fantasy that Orientalists are secret agents of Great Powers further presupposes that Muslims are victims whose destiny is in the hands of Lewis and others like him. A Turkish journalist who was a correspondent in Washington for seven years has just testified that, in 1997, in the State Department building, he saw Lewis conspiring with Madeleine Albright and others to arrange the military coup of that year in Turkey. In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, an Egyptian journalist has been asserting that Lewis is part of an American plot to split the country four ways. Lewis has achieved so much, in other words, that he can do almost anything that can be imagined.

– Mr. Pryce-Jones, a senior editor of National Review, is the author of many books, including The Closed Circle: An Interpretation of the Arabs.

David Pryce-Jones is a British author and commentator and a senior editor of National Review.

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Canadian Crackdown

A considered and empathetic opposition to same-sex marriage has nothing to do with phobia or hatred, but that doesn’t stop Christians, conservatives, and anybody else who doesn’t take the fashionable line ...
Politics & Policy

Tea-Party Prequel

The three-plus years of the Obama administration have been something of a roller coaster for the Republican party and the broader conservative movement. On one hand there was Scott Brown’s ...
Politics & Policy

Getting Irreligion

There was a time when American politicians could condemn godless heathens almost anywhere in the country and expect nothing but lusty applause. Now, however, there are large swathes of the ...
Politics & Policy

Diverse Like Me

Once, not too long ago, when I was hiring writers for a television show, a network executive called me up. “We’re really hoping you’ll keep diversity in mind when you make ...


Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

The Odd Couple

Both the subtitle of Richard Aldous’s book — “The Difficult Relationship” — and its foreword proclaim it to be an exercise in historical revisionism. Justifying this, he quotes Sir Nicholas ...
Politics & Policy

The Scholar

Bernard Lewis is far and away the single most influential commentator in the English language on the Muslim world past and present. In the course of a long lifetime, he ...
Politics & Policy

Running Deep

The problem awaiting any author seeking to define introversion is that, in essence, it is about not needing, and not particularly liking, people. This is a felony in America, so ...
Politics & Policy

Tame Tyrant

During the spring television season, my wife and I became strangely fascinated by the Manhattan real-estate agent Fredrik Eklund, who is featured prominently in Million Dollar Listing: New York, one ...
City Desk

In the Know

‘You are in the seat the cardinal sat in when we had dinner here.” We were three, expecting a fourth. The fourth would be a lady, so we had already ...


Politics & Policy


A Childish Question In “The Empty Playground and the Welfare State” (May 28), Ramesh Ponnuru proposes increasing the child tax credit. Much of the argument is compelling, but I found one ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ A prisoner took 40 percent of the vote in a Democratic presidential primary against Obama. We see the makings of a John Edwards comeback. ‐ President Obama has renewed his ...

To Boldly Politick

It’s one thing to read that scientists are working on teleportation devices. It’s quite another to learn they not only got one to work but beamed something 143 kilometers between ...
Politics & Policy


Time and the River Time and the river have always their place in life as the essential things never to be brought home in triumph or in sorrow; never lost as they can never be possessed; and if ...
Happy Warrior

Eutopia, Limited

As the advanced social-democratic Big Government state sinks under a multi-trillion-dollar debt avalanche, the conventional wisdom remains all too conventional, and disinclined even to mount an argument. So much “progressive” ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Hillary Ruins the Plan

Editor’s note: Andrew C. McCarthy’s new book is Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency. This is the first in a series of excerpts.  There really was a collusion plot. It really did target our election system. It absolutely sought to usurp our capacity for ... Read More

An Insider’s Guide to Italian Insults

The tragicomic irony of Chris Cuomo’s pugilistic outburst earlier this week — cursing and physically threatening a man for taunting him with a reference to the movie The Godfather — is that the CNN anchor reinforced the usual tropes about Italian Americans. We are all wise-guys, goons, and Mafiosi, just ... Read More

Another Pop-Culture Christian Loses His Faith

It’s happened again. For the second time in three weeks, a prominent (at least in Evangelical circles) Christian has renounced his faith. In July, it was Josh Harris, a pastor and author of the mega-best-selling purity-culture book I Kissed Dating Goodbye. This month, it’s Hillsong United songwriter and ... Read More

The End of Hong Kong as We Know It

The protests in Hong Kong have been going on for more than four months now, and no matter how the current crisis concludes in the coming days or weeks, it will mark the end of Hong Kong as we know it. The protests started in response to an extradition bill that was proposed by the city’s Beijing-backed ... Read More
Economy & Business

The Great Mystery

Kevin Williamson disputes my characterization of his riposte. He writes: I wrote that people can choose what kind of work they want to do, and what kind of services they want to consume, without any help from Michael. Kevin then accuses me of being a stouthearted defender of the “Real America.” If ... Read More