Magazine | July 30, 2012, Issue

Letters

Is Nominal-Income Targeting Effective?

In “Monetary Regime Change” (June 11), David Beckworth and Ramesh Ponnuru suggest that the Federal Reserve should adopt a target for nominal-income growth of 5 percent per annum. An imperfect but informative medical analogy would be trying to cure cancer by making your target some magical increase in life expectancy.

The past three years have demonstrated the futility of the recommended approach, since nominal-income targeting has been the implicit objective of Federal Reserve policy. The authors state, correctly, that nominal-GDP growth has averaged 5 percent per annum over the past quarter-century. However, the high level of variation in that statistic (a standard deviation of 2.1 percent) is far more revealing. Nominal-GDP growth plunged from 8.5 percent in the first quarter of 1989 to 2.8 percent in the second quarter of 1991, from 7.5 percent in the second quarter of 2000 to 2.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001, and from 6.6 percent in the second quarter of 2006 to −3.9 percent in the second quarter of 2009.

The levers of monetary policy are the administratively determined discount rate and the federal-funds rate. If these tools could achieve the Holy Grail of 5 percent nominal-GDP growth, the past three years of aggressive Fed policy would have succeeded. Total banking reserves have exploded by 79.9 percent, which has produced increases of 39.4 percent in the narrow M1 money supply, 17.8 percent in the broader M2, and 22.2 percent in paper currency in public circulation. Nominal-GDP growth has lagged not because of a penurious monetary policy but because of a nearly unprecedented drop in money velocity. The root causes of this are structural as well as secular, and they include some concerns that the authors mention.

As every conservative knows, “the fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings.”

Stephen Delos Wilson

Springfield, Tenn.

The Authors reply: During the Great Moderation, central banks followed no explicit rule to stabilize nominal income. They nevertheless stabilized it better than they had done in the decades prior or have done during the recent economic crisis and weak recovery. To the extent they failed to stabilize it — as, Mr. Wilson reminds us, they failed in 1989–1990 and 2000–01 — the results were bad. This history makes us think that central banks should adopt an explicit policy of stabilizing nominal income.

The money supply has indeed risen since the start of the crisis, but it has not risen as much as the demand for money balances. Contrary to Mr. Wilson’s supposition, central banks have influence over this demand. Had the market expected the Federal Reserve to expand supply to meet any rise in demand, demand would not have risen so far in the first place. We would thus probably have a lower money supply if the Fed had adopted a “looser” policy. Nominal-income targeting would work in large part by stabilizing the demand for money.

We agree that the economy has structural problems. In the National Federation of Independent Business’s survey of small businesses, however, the top complaint is not poor labor quality, bad tax laws, or onerous regulations. It’s lack of sales.

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

This Isn’t CNN

Over three months in the winter of 1991, the eminently fashionable French Theorist Jean Baudrillard — you can tell he’s eminently fashionable because “Theorist” is capitalized and takes no modifier ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Russia’s Choice

On the surface, Moscow has never looked more prosperous. High-end restaurants are full. Cyclists, strollers, and rollerbladers crowd Gorky Park. Newly built skyscrapers give the city a modern skyline, and ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

The Thirty Years’ War

As American diplomats and their international partners prepared to sit down with their Iranian counterparts in Baghdad last May to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, the State Department was aflutter. In ...
Politics & Policy

The Marriage Mess

The debate over whether to recognize same-sex relationships as marriages is among the most sensitive, difficult, and important in American public life. Sensitive, because it addresses real people’s happiness, and ...
Politics & Policy

Love Poetry

Angels — at least according to Hollywood — are handsome, shining, and strong. But the angel in Dana Gioia’s new book of poems looks like he’s been in a fight ...
Politics & Policy

Shock Plus Nothing

On the weekend before the Fourth of July, Americans lined up for two raunchy, R-rated exercises in transgression. In heartland cities like Indianapolis, Nashville, and Kansas City, notionally havens of ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Poetry

BELL AND CHALICE Our Reach To Heaven rings true to our humanity through symbols tangible to the mind and to the eye; the deeper the history, the more compelling the concept, the stronger its grip. The chalice bearing the ...
Athwart

War of the Worldviews

A recent National Geographic survey found that Americans trusted Barack Obama over Mitt Romney in the case of an alien invasion. Sixty-five percent to 35 percent. It is not clear ...
Happy Warrior

Street-Sign Statism

I’ve spent the last few weeks tootling round various parts of Britain and Europe, and, as always, it takes me a couple of days to acclimatize to local driving norms. ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

Is Nominal-Income Targeting Effective? In “Monetary Regime Change” (June 11), David Beckworth and Ramesh Ponnuru suggest that the Federal Reserve should adopt a target for nominal-income growth of 5 percent per ...

Most Popular

U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More