Magazine | October 1, 2012, Issue

Political Science

The president of the United States can’t figure out an iPhone. Millions of Americans use iPhones every day, but when confronted with this elemental, intuitive device, he stabbed it with his finger, dashed it to the ground, and shouted witchcraft!

Well, no. An aide on the campaign trail handed him an iPhone to make a call, and he couldn’t figure it out. He explained he was a BlackBerry guy — which nowadays is like saying you really miss the graphical purity of Windows 95 — and then blamed his inability to make the call on the owner’s cell-phone plan. Possibly. When I try to call the Kremlin to reassure them of my flexibility about matters of crucial national security, I get an alert that says “International rates may apply.”

At least he tried! Mitt Romney is a 19th-century robber-baron throwback who has his aides transcribe ticker-tape messages onto foolscap, you know. Perhaps you recall a kerfuffle when he expressed amazement at a touch screen in a sub-sandwich shop — proof he was out of touch with the needs of out-of-work Americans who stare longingly at the extra mayo button and realize they can’t afford the 15-cent charge. Actually, he was using the shop’s technological ingenuity as a comparison with government, whose sole achievement in gesture-based interfaces is the hand of a TSA agent interrogating your groinal department, but never mind. Democrats are hip and all about the Forward! stuff. Conservatives hate science.

We know this because Albert Brooks said so. The night of Romney’s acceptance speech, the actor wrote a tweet: “World’s oceans very excited tonight, If Romney elected they will take over the earth.” Then he sat back, looked at the line, sighed, thought, “Let future generations know that comedians warned them against the inundation of Nebraska,” and hit send. More in sorrow than in anger, really.

It’s something all smart people know: Republicans hate science like chimps hate fire. Republicans regularly gather outside of research institutions with pitchforks, demanding that the eggheads stop trying to prove the existence of theoretical subatomic particles. If God wanted us to know them He would have made them the size of marbles. Stop thinking and explaining things! Look what happened after the invention of the telegraph — it’s been nothing but porn ever since!

Right. Well, here’s what they mean by science:

Using taxpayer money to experiment on human embryos, which would lead to an instant cure for diseases suffered by the relatives of people who make speeches at political rallies. Y’see, many on the right — hereafter, idiots — believe their imaginary Sky-Father put teensy-weensy “souls” into the cells, and this idea is so offensive they must be required to pay for the procedure, as an example to all.

#page#Global warming. Many conservatives believe the Earth might be warming but our contribution is disputable and it’s not worth bankrupting the entire Western economy to preserve two feet of beachfront in Miami. The long-term rhythms of that enormous ancient nuclear reactor up there in the sky might have an effect, if you want to get technical, and it’s unwise to extrapolate rigid theses from anomalous events, unless you think the Dust Bowl was caused by Republican opposition to the New Deal. Anyway, half the scientists in the grand “consensus” are lefty dorks in sandals and black socks who might not hug trees, but they’ve held hands with a branch or two in their day.

Response: The coal industry paid you off because the executives like to pass around snuff films of polar bears falling off melting floes and drowning.

Evolution. Having a discussion in class about the metaphysics of the universe, which is a cover for obstinate Christianist young-Earth doctrine: wrong. Response: You think cavemen rode dinosaurs to work while shouting “Yabba-dabba-doo.” Now, a humanities-class segment on Native American creation stories is different, because they were all spiritual ’n’ stuff.

Genetically modified organisms, created by mad cackling plant vivisectionists. On an aesthetic level, they’re abhorrent; the tongue, after all, can detect the most minute variation in the genome of a carrot. On a health level, well, c’mon: genetically modified. You take the genes of one thing and combine them with the genes of something else, and what do you expect? Okay, right, children, but wheat is totally different.

Related: agricultural chemicals. Helping balky crops with hydromorphic tetradeathazine is bad, but heaping donkey offal around the produce because it’s organic is a healthy choice. Mom-tested and kid-approved!

Nuclear power. Goes without saying. If Fast and Furious had involved the illegal trade in spent nuclear materials, rod-walking them across the border, most of the plants in the country would be shut down.

Irradiated food. This is a safe process that kills the wily E. coli germs so you don’t cramp up with shuddering, gut-gripping pain, spew, and possibly die. But because radiation is involved, the food must be mutated into something unnatural that will produce grotesque Elephant Man–style protuberances, and if we don’t stop it now, 30 years hence the streets will be filled with people who wear sheets and hold signs that say disfigured by hamburgers any help appreciated.

Fracking. Would be perfectly acceptable if it were the only way to get a substance required to make solar panels.

And so on. The Left requires the Right to be stupid and evil in equal portions, and the anti-science rap fits perfectly. There’s probably a smart-phone app that sends you alerts when someone on the right does something that betrays his lack of scientific sophistication.

It would just be hilarious to watch the president try to download it.

– Mr. Lileks blogs at

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Risky Choice

Watching the Democratic convention in Charlotte, at least in the hours before the networks started covering it, one might have gotten the impression that the chief threat to the common ...


Politics & Policy

Obama’s Truth

More than any Democratic president since Franklin Roosevelt, Barack Obama in his writings and speeches has worked out an impressive interpretation of American history that culminates in modern liberalism. It ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Out of the Gulag

North Korea’s continued existence is a blot on the consciences of the United States and other Free World nations. It is indeed “hell on earth,” as Melanie Kirkpatrick’s new book ...
Politics & Policy

Know the Terrain

Some 70 years ago, the Dutch-American geopolitical writer Nicholas Spykman observed that “geography is the most fundamental factor in foreign policy because it is the most permanent.” The physical setting ...



Political Science

The president of the United States can’t figure out an iPhone. Millions of Americans use iPhones every day, but when confronted with this elemental, intuitive device, he stabbed it with ...
The Long View


TO: Polling staff FROM: Stats department RE: New polling questions To All: As you know, it’s “silly season” in our business, and if there’s one thing we can count on, it’s that whatever poll ...
Politics & Policy


STAR BRIGHT Each soul is the last of its kind, the last of the Mohicans, the singular Tom Jones of the time, the everyman of fable, legend, and history. Whatever comes into the world, however changed by the ...
Politics & Policy


On Recess Appointments Ramesh Ponnuru’s “Obama vs. the Constitution” (September 10) is absolutely appropriate for consideration by intelligent voters come November 6. However, I believe he was imprecise in describing the ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Reading the papers, it looks like Republicans are running the most lowdown, dishonest campaign since the last time they won. ‐ In his speech to the Democratic convention, President Obama ...

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More