Magazine | March 11, 2013, Issue


A Fighting Chance

In “The Right to Bear Arms and Popular Sovereignty” (February 11), Charles C. W. Cooke reports that the Second Amendment was designed to protect the right of the citizenry to defend itself against state tyranny. One difficult question is this: Has the right become purely theoretical or symbolic, given that the people will never have military weapons? When the people and the state would have fought each other with muskets, the right certainly would have meant more in practice.

Jared Stuart

Birmingham, Ala.

Charles C. W. Cooke replies: My view here is twofold. On the theory side, that the citizenry could not necessarily win a fight against tyranny by no means undermines its right to try, nor its right to keep arms in case such a situation arises. I almost certainly couldn’t outshout a tyrannical government, whose access to the bully pulpit would give it a range far beyond my own. But this wouldn’t render my First Amendment rights valueless in fighting back or render them anachronistic. A citizen’s having the right to protect himself against future oppression is not a recently developed idea. New Hampshire’s constitution of 1784 went so far as to codify it:

[Art.] 10. Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.

On the practical side: Although the citizenry could almost certainly not win a pitched battle against the concerted efforts of the state, it would be almost impossible for a tyrannical government effectively to rule a people that was in open rebellion against it. The Americans in 1775 were underpowered — with a chronic lack of training and gunpowder — but they had on their side a divided British parliament and a distaste for fighting among many British soldiers whose loyalties were divided.

A lesson from Iraq, Afghanistan, and especially Vietnam is that, in the long term, you just can’t beat a guerrilla force. Orwell wrote:

Ages in which the dominant weapon is expensive or difficult to make will tend to be ages of despotism, whereas when the dominant weapon is cheap and simple, the common people have a chance. Thus, for example, tanks, battleships and bombing planes are inherently tyrannical weapons, while rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon — so long as there is no answer to it — gives claws to the weak.

America’s federal government is now possessed of an arsenal of “complex weapons,” whereas the people have hundreds of millions of “simple weapons.” Nonetheless, 270 million “simple weapons” presented against a divided U.S. military in an interconnected modern world? Unless we presume that the tyrannical government’s aim would be one-time annihilation, I’d take my chances.

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Benedict’s Legacy

History will most likely treat Pope Benedict XVI more kindly than his chattering-class contemporaries, who held him in barely disguised (or undisguised) contempt, caricaturing him as a former Hitler Youth ...


Politics & Policy


In 1691, Thomas Neale was given a 21-year concession on postal services in Their Majesties’ prospering American colonies. Neale never set foot in the New World and was an epically ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Take the Noir Pill

Steven Soderbergh has been making movies lately at a pace that feels almost compulsive, and his recent announcement that his latest film will be his last should probably be understood ...
Politics & Policy

The Empty Cradle?

Jonathan Last has just added one more cloud to the darkening sky that many conservatives see on America’s horizon. To growing conservative concerns about an entitlements crisis, fiscal ruin, soft ...


Politics & Policy


A Fighting Chance In “The Right to Bear Arms and Popular Sovereignty” (February 11), Charles C. W. Cooke reports that the Second Amendment was designed to protect the right of the ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ In a delicate operation, Hugo Chávez was removed from a cancerous tumor. ‐ The 2011 deal to raise the debt ceiling included an across-the-board cut to planned spending on defense ...
The Long View

News Clips from the Past

From the Manchester Poste, January 1774: . . . after a muche learned and complikated discourse, Mr. John Adams of Bostowne took a small breathe, and pursuant to continuing in his ...

Put Down the Controller!

We need to have a national conversation about national conversations. There aren’t any guidelines. Do arguments in our heads with people who have different opinions count? Does “conversation” actually mean ...
Politics & Policy


OAK LEAVES She had a studious-sprightly walk, this wren, this girl ahead of me, she on the way to the brick, and so, to her eyes, alien library, nearly empty that weekend day. She didn’t ...

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More