Magazine | September 30, 2013, Issue

Breakfast of Autocrats

If scientists discover that there is sufficient mass in the universe to slow its expansion and eventually cause all matter to collapse into one infinitely hot point in a hundred billion years, it will be Bush’s fault.

That’s just one of the things we’ve learned in the run-up to the Syrian stand-down, or whatever happens between the time this column is submitted and the time it ends up in your hands. It’s possible that Putin will float something that defuses the situation — say, Syria pretends to hand over its chemical weapons and the U.S. mothballs a carrier group. You’d like to think the president would say no. You fear he’d put his hand over the receiver and ask an aide, “Hey, how many of those do we have?”

Anyway, it’s Bush’s fault because he made the public war-weary. Here are some other lessons recent events have taught us:

1. Republican omnipotence remains undiluted. Ed Schultz, an MSNBC host who yells about things — if that narrows it down — believes that the president is being pushed into this war by Republican warmongers. That is exactly what you expect from someone whose ideas about anything “international” should be taken seriously only if followed by the words “House of Pancakes.” But this is how some on the left deal with the cognitive dissonance of the Peace Prize Lightworker blowing up dusky people: The nation cannot resist the persuasive powers of Republican arguments. Why, if President McCain’s for it, that’s good enough for me! Saddle up!

2. “War” is not war if the secretary of state deems the effort infinitesimal. John Kerry said any strike wouldn’t be like Afghanistan or Iraq — you know, where you do something loud and violent, and keep doing it until you win. A Syrian adventure would be “incredibly small,” which suggests we’re sending pixies to bombard them with quarks.

The Obama administration’s new “incredibly small” doctrine of not-war  provided the Pentagon with something of a puzzler, since a previous characterization of the not-war was something “muscular enough not to be mocked,” even if it went to the gym wearing mom jeans.  Blow up ten bases: mockable. Blow up 15: too much. Blow up twelve and degrade three: General Goldilocks, that’s perfect.

Possible non-mockable not-war options: Five hundred Tomahawk missiles that deploy confetti when striking their targets; saturation bombing with Not Exactly Really Fearsome (NERF) foam munitions developed by the Army for practice missions; Delta Force soldiers whose guns deploy a flag that says “Bang!” when they pull the trigger; and so on.

Well, here’s the total list of muscular non-mockable military actions:

A nuclear bomb

Another nuclear bomb

#page#Anything else is mockable, since it allows Assad to act like the French soldiers in Monty Python and the Holy Grail and shout “Your mother smells of elderberries” and “You pitch like a girl” from the comforts of his bunker.

3. There’s another calculation in the non-mockable manly-man not-war calibrated red-line reinforcement package: the cereal-cutlery metaphor. No doubt you’ve heard this:

“A second senior official offered this metaphor to describe such a strike: ‘If Assad is eating Cheerios, we’re going to take away his spoon and give him a fork. Will that degrade his ability to eat Cheerios? Yes. Will it deter him? Maybe. But he’ll still be able to eat Cheerios.’”

This suggests that military planners have become adept at describing complex operations in terms a seven-year-old would understand: “Mr. President, this option has a risk of civilian owies, but there’s a 50 percent chance we will, in fact, defeat the big meanie.” Anyway, we’re going to take away his spoon and give him a fork. Perhaps if it’s unbelievably small and forcibly shoved into his hand by someone muscular, that’ll work. As the general noted, it’s still possible to eat Cheerios with a fork. You want Assad to eat his Cheerios with a knife, which is much more difficult, or, better yet, to slurp a liquefied mush of Cheerios through a straw, since the attack left him unable to consume solids. If he’s eating Lucky Charms, however, he can use a fork to stab all the crunchy marshmallows, which are really the best part. 

It’s a reminder of how our military has changed. Patton: “I’m going to march to Berlin and put the barrel of my pearl-handled revolver in the mouth of that paperhanging SOB.” Modern generals: “What we’re looking for is a response that leaves him with a somewhat less flaky croissant than he’s used to, and cold enough so it leaves crumbs all over when you bite it. We’re also looking to degrade his jam stocks.”

4. TV newsreaders love to use “military” terms when war is imminent; makes them feel like they’re broadcasting from the Blitz, wearing a trench coat. The use of the phrase “boots on the ground” by TV persons is particularly annoying, and shall henceforth be used only if one is referring to Private John Boots or to Boots, the Company Mascot Dog. Slinging the lingo makes you a military expert no more than saying “heels on the catwalk” makes you a fashion model.

5. The Left will be okay with this. Actor Ed Asner said that many are hesitant to be critical because “they don’t want to feel anti-black.” To which one can only quote MLK: I dream of a day when people will be judged not by the color of their skin but by their ludicrous inability to craft a clear doctrine, project strength, stand up to devious Rooskies, and behave as though the burdens of office aren’t interfering with tee time.

Prescient man, Dr. King.

– Mr. Lileks blogs at www.lileks.com.

James Lileks — James Lileks writes the Athwart column for National Review magazine and is a frequent contributor to the National Review website. He is a prominent voice on Ricochet podcasts.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Only Enemies

The images will not leave my mind. A baby, not seven weeks old, shot in the face to “send a message” to villagers supporting the Iraqi government. A young woman, her ...

Features

Politics & Policy

The Cuccinelli Comeback

This November, Republicans will face the first major test of whether their candidates can overcome “Akin-ization” — Democrats’ efforts to tie them to the theocratic bogeyman evoked by failed Missouri ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Brave New Europe

On April 18, 1951, in the French foreign ministry’s Salon de l’Horloge, six men gathered to sign an accord unlike any other. The Treaty of Paris, which created the European ...
Politics & Policy

Post-War Wars

Civilization in Asia and Africa is ancient, but the current political map of those continents is strikingly modern: It was largely drawn in the decade or two after World War ...
Politics & Policy

Family Man

During his most productive years — from 1942 to 1962 — J. F. Powers published two volumes of short stories and one novel, Morte d’Urban. The novel — a subtle ...
Politics & Policy

POTUS and Circuses

When Chris Christie was asked how he could simultaneously love Bruce Springsteen’s music and hate his politics, he famously responded: “I compartmentalize.” Conservatives who don’t want to limit their pop-culture diet ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

Further Debate on the Origin of Species As an avid reader of National Review, I’m honored that you would review my book Darwin’s Doubt. Unfortunately, longtime intelligent-design critic John Farrell wildly ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ We have to admit: Russia making U.S. foreign policy does count as a reset. ‐ For the Obama administration, big speeches are like the morning-after pill, an emergency prophylactic. Realizing ...
Athwart

Breakfast of Autocrats

If scientists discover that there is sufficient mass in the universe to slow its expansion and eventually cause all matter to collapse into one infinitely hot point in a hundred ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

OCTOBER Deep woods Down East, we’re cabined, cribbed, confined, And bedded down. Up through an oculus, The wiry asters glint — and wink, though they are blind. All day, the rifle shots have shaken ...
Happy Warrior

The Taboo Cliché

Numerous books promise to pull back the veil on “the last taboo.” Some are surprisingly dull-sounding, given the sales pitch. I’m sure the authors of The Last Taboo: A Survival ...

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More