Magazine | February 10, 2014, Issue

A Different Kind of War

A review of Lone Survivor

The cliché is that American war films fall into two categories: movies about World War II, which are patriotic, heroic, celebratory, and confident in both the mission and the men, and movies about Vietnam, which are pessimistic, brutal, critical of the mission, and inclined to portray the men as victims, lunatics, or both. And the many exceptions notwithstanding, the cliché gets something right: There is a paradigmatic World War II movie (The Longest Day, The Guns of Navarone) and a paradigmatic Vietnam movie (Platoon, Casualties of War), and everyone can recognize the difference.

As of now, I think it’s fair to say we have a paradigmatic movie for our post–Cold War wars as well — for the age of Somalia and Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq.

There have been war movies in this era that tried to imitate the World War II model — straightforward paeans to the righteousness of American hegemony, like Tears of the Sun and Behind Enemy Lines. There have been films that tried to give our post-9/11 wars the Vietnam treatment: Paul Haggis’s In the Valley of Elah, Robert Redford’s Lions for Lambs. But the truest-seeming movies have been the ones that have taken a third way: They have embraced the soldiers, taking their side nearly absolutely, while remaining studiously agnostic about the wars themselves.

There are no characters in these movies like Tom Berenger’s vicious Sergeant Barnes in Platoon, no screaming Full Metal Jacket drill instructors or napalm-smelling Kilgores. Instead, the culture of the military is treated generously, the soldier’s vocation is portrayed positively, and the specific missions depicted tend to have a morally admirable purpose. But at the same time there’s an air of pessimism and skepticism hanging over the stories — a sense that while we’re watching good people do their best for righteous ends, the wars themselves may be futile.

I have in mind here a film like Ridley Scott’s Black Hawk Down, a true post-9/11 movie (no matter that it was filmed just before the 9/11 attacks), with its Army Rangers fighting their way out of a humanitarian mission gone awry. Or a film like The Hurt Locker, the only war movie to win Best Picture in this era, with its Iraq War bomb squad — battered, traumatized, complicated, war-addicted, but still obviously on the side of right.

Or, now, a film like Lone Survivor, about a Navy SEAL team ambushed in the Afghan mountains in 2005 — another case of extraordinary heroism in a mission gone awry.

Peter Berg’s movie is, in many ways, a straightforward tribute to the troops, heartfelt and uncomplicated. It opens with real-life footage of SEAL training, closes with candid shots of the real-life dead, and in between gives us America’s elite soldiers as we want them to be: a band of brothers, a crew of happy warriors, lethal and decent all at once.

#page#The crucial figures are played by Mark Wahlberg, Taylor Kitsch (late of the Berg-produced Friday Night Lights), Emile Hirsch, and Ben Foster. They make up the reconnaissance team that infiltrates an isolated Afghan valley in search of the Taliban warlord Ahmad Shah, with a larger U.S. force, under a lieutenant commander played by Eric Bana, waiting to swoop in once Shah is located.

Shah is there, but the SEALs are out of communication range by the time they spot him, and, before the four-man team can summon support, a group of local goatherders stumbles on their hiding place. The Americans hold them at gunpoint, a brief debate about the rules of engagement ensues, and then the mission is aborted and the goatherders are sent one way while the SEALs head in the other. But the moral choice is not rewarded: Before they can reach safety, a swarm of Taliban fighters pin our heroes down, and the subsequent firefight and attempted rescue mission both go as badly as the movie’s title would lead one to expect.

Survivor is not quite on the same artistic level as Black Hawk or Hurt Locker — less subtle than the latter, less visually remarkable than the former — mostly because Berg isn’t quite on the same level as Ridley Scott and Kathryn Bigelow. But it’s a very solid movie (“very solid” is basically Mark Wahlberg’s middle name at this point), and it leaves you with the same mix of feelings that those earlier films did: an appreciation for the courage and skill of America’s fighting men, a sense that what they do is harrowing and honorable — and an anxiety that there’s no real strategy here, and that the larger missions are being undertaken more or less in vain.

The reaction to Lone Survivor suggests that some people have trouble with this ambiguity. A few reviewers on the left have blasted the movie for being too hagiographic and nationalistic (a “jingoistic snuff film,” an LA Weekly writer called it) — as though Berg and Co. were supposed to pretend that Ahmad Shah was a morally complicated bloke whose henchmen deserved as much celebration as the men who died trying to put him out of business.

Meanwhile, on the right there was a mini-controversy when CNN’s Jake Tapper, interviewing Marcus Luttrell, the mission’s real-life lone survivor, remarked that the movie left him with a sense of “hopelessness,” and a “torn” feeling about the war itself. Luttrell objected, accusing his interviewer — who has reported extensively and sympathetically on U.S. troops in Afghanistan — of suggesting that his fellow SEALs had “died for nothing,” and an online chorus quickly echoed him, casting Tapper as a critic of the troops.

But that wasn’t really Tapper’s point. There’s no question the men in Lone Survivor died for something real — for a morally upright mission, for their country, for each other.

Nine long years of conflict later, though, it takes nothing away from their heroism to recognize — with the best war movies of this era — the potentially Sisyphean context of their task.

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

A Dangerous Deal

For nearly three decades, Iran’s ayatollahs have outfoxed and outmaneuvered Western counter-proliferation efforts. Tehran has repeatedly bested our diplomats, our spies, and, most especially, our gullible political leaders. In the ...


Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

The Twain, Meeting

About ten, fifteen years ago, a phrase occurred to me: “the Sinification of music.” This refers to the ever-growing influence of Chinese musicians on Western classical music. Has this influence ...


Politics & Policy


Racist Roll Call Reading Kevin D. Williamson’s article “Racism! Squirrel!” (December 31 issue) brought back fond memories of roll call when we had a substitute teacher. As the teacher got to ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Little-known fact: François Hollande’s security is provided by Arkansas state troopers. ‐ “What difference, at this point, does it make?” asked the presumed front-runner in the 2016 presidential race when ...

Arise Ye Media

Over at Salon there’s an excerpt from the book Imagine: Living in a Socialist USA. The title, you suspect, comes from John Lennon’s limp hymn to a happy hippie hand-holding ...
The Long View

Document Extracts

Politics & Policy


WORLD An edgeless bird Made of words Passes above the yard. Dense as a hoof, Skids from the roof A block of numbers, falling, striking hard. In the water tank Stirs, with a clank, A serpent, gorged on images, ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More