Magazine | March 10, 2014, Issue

A Professional Correspondence

Wilson & Sterling

A professional corporation


Dear Steve:

Many thanks for the phone call yesterday. It clarified many issues we’ve been discussing, and I think perhaps as our clients move forward, and as my client, former secretary of state Clinton, ponders a follow-on political career, many of the side agreements we’ve been discussing over the years need to be itemized.

I refer you to the CONTINUATION-OF-MARRIAGE AGREEMENT, CLINTON & CLINTON, and in specific Appendices XXIV and XLVII, “Definition of and Limitations upon Public Displays of Affection between the Parties” and “Definition of and Limitations upon Public Displays of Affection between Parties and Other As-Yet Undefined Persons.” As you know, this is the crux of the matter.

My client is very grateful for your client’s willingness, since his presidential term ended in January 2001, to be a supportive and arm’s-length partner in what continues to be a fruitful, financially beneficial, mutually convenient, and legally compliant “marriage.” As I know you’re aware, his conduct throughout this period has been governed and bounded, contractually, by the original language of the first executed draft of the CONTINUATION-OF-MARRIAGE AGREEMENT, CLINTON & CLINTON 1992–1997, inclusive of the “emergency protocols” put into the agreement in the wake of the independent prosecutor’s report. In exchange for her continued support and maintenance of the “marriage” and “marriage likeness,” your client agreed to those terms.

So, to get into it, here is the one non-negotiable deal-breaker:

That your client begins upon execution of the new agreement to curtail what we have previously defined as his “lady time” on a step-basis to be mutually defined, resulting in zero (0) instances of lady time should my client be successful in her follow-on political career. I think we both know this will be hard for your client to agree to, but we also know it’s a non-negotiable. We are using the broad definition of “lady time” for this purpose (please see Appendix XXXIV of the 2009 CONTINUATION ADDENDUM for further details), which includes flight attendants, current and former film actresses in both pornographic and non-pornographic materials, and, obviously, interns.

#page#There are other items, of course. Still to be worked out, obviously, are the living arrangements should my client be relocating to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. But these are, as you mentioned on the phone, “doable.” It’s not as if our clients haven’t shared that facility before, in similar and frostier circumstances. But the item above is the deal-breaker for my client. And if your client cannot see his way to an agreement, it’s fruitless to continue to negotiate. It will be time to execute ARTICLE CXC of the AGREEMENT 1998 WITH UPDATES 2000, 2004, 2008, 2010, 2013.

I look forward to hearing from you. Clearly this matter is not urgent, and, knowing our two clients and their wise choice to communicate exclusively via counsel, I accept that it will take some time to hammer out.




Wilmer, Patton

A professional corporation


Dear Greg:

Many thanks for your note. As you know, my client is currently out of the country, attending to his duties as an international philanthropic leader, and at this time he cannot be reached for a lengthy consult.

While I agree that it might not be feasible for our two clients to speak directly or be in the same room — part of the health and longevity of their strong and loving marriage rests on their resolve on that point — I think we both know that my client has more than discharged his responsibilities pursuant to the previous agreement. In plain terms, when he wanted your client’s continued services as wife/helpmate, an agreement was struck and honored. Now, years later, it is your client who has political ambitions and my client who is wanted as a spouse/helpmate, and I would be remiss if I did not remark that in the entirety of your lengthy letter, you never once suggested what, exactly, your client is willing to offer my client in exchange for his compliance on your “non-negotiable” request.

May I suggest that you return to your client with this thought: My client needs to be incentivized. My client needs to know where his benefits lie in a new agreement. And to guide your thinking, may I draw your attention to the position of secretary of state, which has the added benefit of requiring a great deal of international travel resulting in fewer nights spent at home, or at “home.”

Looking forward to your response,


In This Issue


Politics & Policy

A Campus Apart

Hillsdale, Mich. — ‘There are some closet liberals here,” a student tells me. The phrase makes my blood run a little cold. I have known lots of closet conservatives, on ...


Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Roots of Hatred

In Islamic societies, Jews are still widely thought of as people of bad character who cannot help engaging in criminal conspiracy. Muslims are advised several times in their canonical writings ...
Politics & Policy

The Force of Law

American conservatives are split into two main camps on the issue of judicial enforcement of the Constitution. One, exemplified by the work of the late Robert Bork, believes our system ...
Politics & Policy

Save the Next Generation

Everyone — certainly every reader of National Review — knows America’s public schools are a disgrace. He or she also knows that, barring a few elite institutions such as Harvard, ...


Politics & Policy


¿Cómo se dice ‘homonym’? I assure you that I share your contempt for the Affordable Care Act, but one of your criticisms of the Spanish-language site is undeserved (The Week, February ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ John Kerry says that climate change is a weapon of mass destruction. We assume that means that he will support a war against it, then bug out after a ...

Bridge to Nowhere

Imagine a progressively inclined cable-news consumer running through the channels, sneering at the offerings. Fox: a massacre of Venezuelan protesters — damned CIA, up to their old tricks. CNN: An ...
The Long View

A Professional Correspondence

Wilson & Sterling A professional corporation IN RE: CLINTON/CLINTON CONTINUATION-OF-MARRIAGE AGREEMENT 2000, AND ADDENDA, UPDATED JUNE 2012, CODICIL AND FURTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Dear Steve: Many thanks for the phone call yesterday. It clarified ...
Politics & Policy


THE SCENT OF APPLES As one comes upon the last days of autumn, after the long rain that brings down the old leaves, the sky dark, and brooding, the harvest in, and its moon, ...
Happy Warrior

Where the Action Is

People keep asking me whom I favor for the 2016 Republican nomination. I politely demur — and not just because it’s almost three years till Election Day, and at this ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have ... Read More
White House

Politico Doubles Down on Fake Turnberry Scandal

It's tough to be an investigative reporter. Everybody who feeds you a tip has an axe to grind. Or, alternatively, you find yourself going, "I wonder if . . . ?" You put in your research, you talk to lots of people, you accumulate a huge pile of information, but you still haven't proved your hypothesis. A wise ... Read More

Four Cheers for Incandescent Light Bulbs

It brought me much -- indeed, too much -- joy to hear of the Trump administration's rollback of restrictions on incandescent light bulbs, even if the ban will remain in place. The LED bulbs are terrible. They give off a pitiable, dim, and altogether underwhelming "glow," one that never matched the raw (if ... Read More