Magazine | July 21, 2014, Issue

Glorious Gridlock

Fact: Washington’s inability to get stuff done is the most critical issue facing our nation today — and, who knows, maybe ever.

I know this because D.C.’s lack of productivity has been the focus of countless panel discussions, featuring lots of important people. It’s a topic churned through endlessly by distressed pundits and columnists. It’s a calamity that drives an entire subgenre of political journalism. (“Can this government be saved?” asks one unsettling headline I ran across in USA Today recently.) In neighborhood markets and gas stations across this great nation, from Beacon Hill to Chappaqua to Adams Morgan, Washington’s impotence weighs heavily on the minds of most ordinary Americans.

Well, perhaps. The notion that Washington isn’t “working” is so deeply embedded in our national dialogue, it goes virtually unchallenged. If you’re interested in how the media reach this conclusion, simply calculate the ratio of liberal-policy-agenda items that have been proposed to liberal-policy-agenda items that have passed. Needless to say, D.C. has hit intolerable levels of uselessness. The only thing left to ask is what we can do to end the quagmire that’s gripped this formerly dynamic city.

Whatever we want, answers the administration, that’s what.

When Speaker of the House John Boehner recently announced that he was going to sue the Obama administration for its lavish use of executive power, the president’s former political adviser David Axelrod posed a question worth pondering to his Twitter followers: “Shouldn’t it be taxpayers suing Congress for LACK of action, instead of Congress suing the President for doing too much?”

You can never do too much good, can you? Now, some people — granted, crazy people — might argue that obstructing harmful legislation is an action. And a rather constructive action, at that. These same people might also observe that Axelrod’s insinuation that “action” is to be venerated even if it bends the law or functions outside constitutional norms has an unnerving authoritarian ring to it. They may even reason that justifying unilateral action with infantile slogans like “We can’t wait!” or “It was the right thing to do” is not only in contention for World’s Most Vacuous Populist Rhetoric but creates a dangerous precedent for abuse of power. Even more dangerous than failing to pass the Lilly Ledbetter Act, if you can imagine such a future.

Of course, there are the residual structural problems left to us by the Founders, who, among other silly notions, charged Congress rather than the president with the task of legislating. This is why Obama, through no fault of his own, has been pressed to occasionally “borrow the power,” as one prominent Democrat likes to put it. So while the Supreme Court may have recently (and unanimously) found that the administration abused authority in making recess appointments, Obama promises he will brandish his pen only “when we have a serious issue, and Congress chooses to do nothing” . . . which doesn’t sound autocratic at all.

While some obstacles to progress can be briefly circumvented with creative borrowing, the only way to resolve the partisanship problem in politics is through institutional reform. And, fortunately, a group featuring governors, academics, technocrats, former White House officials, and an array of other smart people — not to mention former Senate leaders Trent Lott and Tom Daschle, a duo that knows a little something about creating a purring political efficiency — have pooled their gravitas in the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Commission on Political Reform. The group offers beleaguered citizens a blueprint to “ease the friction that has contributed to fiscal cliffs, government shutdowns and a record low public approval rating for Congress.”

How does the plan work? It begins with redistricting reform, so that we can transform an “overtly political process” by granting independent commissions the power to create more competitive districts and generate candidates who “represent the breadth of the electorate,” explained Olympia Snowe, one of the would-be reformers. Who doesn’t dream of a process that yields more malleable politicians who represent everyone? And who doesn’t believe partisan tensions can be lowered by transforming every single district into a battleground that will take tens of millions of dollars to win every two years?

The panel also suggests we move away from party caucuses and conventions, and instead set a national congressional-primary day when independents and members of the opposing party can participate in choosing candidates. All of which seems to undercut the idea of a political party. In Washington, reforms would limit the use of filibusters in the Senate to block debates on bills, but allow the minority greater opportunity to offer amendments. This would, one imagines, allow the minority to feel better about themselves, but ensure that they have absolutely no say in the outcome.

Hey, I don’t want to be part of the problem, but it might be pointed out that the commission fails to take into account one minor issue: They’re dealing with human beings. Perhaps partisanship, as ugly as it can be sometimes, is a reflection of the geographical, ideological, and theological differences of real people. Maybe attempting to subvert diversity of opinion won’t create harmony. Maybe allowing one party to lord it over half the country is not the way to temper anger. And maybe the friction we see isn’t the consequence of a structural problem, or money in politics, or racism, or even the irrational desire of conservatives to be persistently disagreeable. Maybe Americans have philosophical disagreements that can’t be bridged. Maybe trying to cram huge, centralizing reforms through Congress is what creates gridlock. And right now, maybe taking a time-out in the form of political inaction is the best-case scenario. Because maybe Washington is working.

– Mr. Harsanyi is a senior editor of the Federalist.

David Harsanyi — David Harsanyi is a senior editor of the Federalist and the author of First Freedom: A Ride through America’s Enduring History with the Gun, From the Revolution to Today

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Take Two

En route from New York to Philadelphia — It would be hard to imagine a nicer, swankier bus than Dinesh D’Souza’s. “It’s a lot better than Tom Cruise’s,” says Jerry ...

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Hillary’s War of Fog

Reading Hillary Clinton’s memoir of her State Department years is like wading through an ocean of oatmeal. Cloying, tiring (sometimes to the point of exhaustion), and as controversy-free as possible, ...
Politics & Policy

Shaper of Modern America

Docents at William Tecumseh Sherman’s boyhood home in Lancaster, Ohio, treat visitors to a telling anecdote from the general’s youth. The ginger-complected Sherman was so incensed when a foster brother ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

Writing and the Right Adam Bellow’s cover piece, “Let Your Right Brain Run Free” (July 7), argues compellingly that without engaging the arts, conservatives’ political efforts are doomed to fail — ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Okay, the World Cup starts when? ‐ Hillary Clinton can’t leave wealthy enough alone. After her “dead broke” interview, she told the Guardian that regular Americans “don’t see me as ...
Athwart

Apocalypse-Proof E-Mail

Lucky Lois Lerner: I couldn’t lose old e-mails if I wanted to. Let me explain. First: I hate e-mail. Loathe it. Oh, it was fun at first, back when AOL was ...
The Long View

Official Transcript: Your Money Matters

Syndicated radio call-in show with the Clintons Hillary Clinton: “Hi, is the caller there?” Caller: “Hi, Hillary. Can I call you ‘Hillary’?” Hillary Clinton: “Of course! I’m just an ordinary American grandmother!” Caller: “Oh, ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

THE PAINTING When I was sleeping in the sun A window seeped into my eyes: Bright green, soft green, then overrun With orange. There was no gift, no prize Greater than seeing it, no thought Of ...
Happy Warrior

Glorious Gridlock

Fact: Washington’s inability to get stuff done is the most critical issue facing our nation today — and, who knows, maybe ever. I know this because D.C.’s lack of productivity has ...

Most Popular

Culture

Jussie Smollett Changes His Story Again

The actor Jussie Smollett continues to talk about the alleged January 29 attack on him during a frigid night in Chicago, giving Good Morning America his fullest description yet of his claims. It differs substantially from what he told police initially after the alleged assault. Smollett told GMA that the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

We’ll Regret This

Mitch McConnell says the president will sign the budget deal and he will also declare a national emergency to build the wall, as I expected. We’ll see the legal justifications he uses, but as a political and constitutional matter this is a long-term disaster. Oh, it might be good for Trump according to the ... Read More