Magazine | August 25, 2014, Issue

A Pot of Message

Not a week before (or maybe after) the great book editor Adam Bellow made the cover of this very pamphlet with a clarion call for conservative art, I met him at a fancy Upper East Side fête for our own Eliana Johnson, on the occasion of her umpteenth birthday. There were so many conservative luminaries in attendance (never name-drop; De Niro taught me that), it occurred to me that a well-placed drone strike could set the movement back 50 years.

Which would have been a shame, because I wouldn’t have been able to tell Bellow, between the gins fizz and the ritualistic immigrant flogging, that I thought so much of his essay was right on.

He’s right, for instance, that the political assumptions of popular culture are more lefty than they’ve ever been. He’s right that conservative non-fiction is limited by its preponderance of “Liberals: Could One Be under Your Bed This Very Minute?!?!” titles. And he’s right that the most promising avenue for conservative intellectual rebirth is through fiction — Bellow has novels in mind, for thoughtful reasons, but I’d nevertheless widen his scope to include film, stage, and television.

The trick is that political art qua political art is almost by its nature anti-conservative. For one thing, fiction, way back to Aristotle, is about action and change. Conservatism is about preservation and repose. Sure, there can be conservative art insofar as conservatism is reactionary, because “action” is right there in the middle of the word. Joss Whedon’s criminally underrated sci-fi allegory Serenity, for example, contains one of the pithiest summations of the logos of conservative counterrevolution ever uttered. You don’t even need the context to feel the awesome: “A year from now, ten, they’ll swing back to the belief that they can make people . . . better. And I do not hold to that. So no more running; I aim to misbehave.”

See what I mean?

But popular storytelling is usually a fairly formulaic endeavor, and the fact is that conservative themes do much better as subtext than as text. Stories about rebels and revolutionaries and “forward-thinking” iconoclasts who tear down idols and put the system on trial® are easier to make vital than stories about prudent, contemplative women and men who work quietly and cautiously to preserve the wisdom of the ages.

That’s why, although Jonah Goldberg is surely right to point out that Hollywood films are more conservative than Hollywood filmmakers — more pro-military, pro-family, and so forth — it’s not a coincidence that most of the artists who make them have no idea they’re putting out conservative art. Not least Whedon, mentioned above, who probably wouldn’t be caught dead with you, reader, or with me.

This is a genuine asymmetry in our popular culture. There are plenty of conservative works of art that don’t realize they’re conservative. But name me one liberal work that doesn’t realize it’s liberal.

That conservatism can be smuggled into popular culture is something of an advantage for conservatives — the best medicine is the dose you don’t even know you’re taking — and that liberalism is often so painfully explicit is a corresponding disadvantage. It means that conservatives can influence the culture without having to produce “cause fiction,” what Bellow calls the “right-wing version of socialist realism.”

And that’s a good thing, because most “cause fiction” does not age well. To realize this, one need look back no farther than the antediluvian years before 2009, practically a fertile crescent of “important” film and music and such, arrayed, at turns nebulously and on the nose, against George W. Bush.

I conducted an informal survey among colleagues about the worst anti-Bush art, and the results were a mélange of best-forgotten artifacts of a strange time when dissent was still a form of patriotism: preachy, leaden political snoozers like Robert Redford’s Lions for Lambs and so-bad-it’s-maybe-good dystopian messes like Southland Tales, from the guy who brought you Donnie Darko. But the one that was mentioned again and again was Green Day’s low-grade rock opera American Idiot.

Hailed as a masterpiece upon its release at the height of the 2004 presidential election and garlanded with Grammys and multi-platinum status, American Idiot now sounds like a bloated trifle of a record from a once-vital band in decline, given faux-resonance by the perfect fit between its slapdash pretension (“I’m not part of your redneck agenda!”) and the Greater Left’s emerging dyspepsia.

That year Green Day played a number of shows as part of “Rock against Bush” — a tour of faded ’90s pop-punk bands like NOFX, the Descendents, and the Offspring and an accompanying get-out-the-vote campaign organized to forestall the president’s reelection. The tour was modeled after 1984’s “Rock against Reagan” and, you’ll note, met similar results. These groups were animated by a diffusion of the Green Day impulse, a reservoir of untapped angst in search of an object. They had spent the ’90s amiably chugging through power-chord anthems on onanism and flatulence, and you could now almost feel their glee at having something significant vaguely to be against.

Now there is plenty of bad conservative “cause” art. And there were great political records produced during the reign of blah-blah-blah-Bush-blows, but they weren’t “cause” records per se. They were full of paranoid-style atmospherics and contrarian anthems, and even if a right-winger found their fears misplaced he could still fundamentally empathize with them. I think of records like Sleater-Kinney’s One Beat, the National’s Boxer, Spoon’s Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga, Yeasayer’s All Hour Cymbals, and TV on the Radio’s Return to Cookie Mountain. By contrast, Aughts odes to unsubtlety like Pearl Jam’s “Bushleaguer” and the Rolling Stones’ “Sweet Neo Con” (yeesh) don’t hold up so well.

And that, finally, is why conservative pop culture has a chance. We can show. More often than not, they can’t help but tell.

Mr. Foster is a political consultant and a former news editor of National Review Online.

Daniel FosterDaniel Foster is a former news editor of National Review Online.

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Subsidized Decline

A political storm is brewing in Washington over the consequences of rising college costs, but few politicians are talking about the causes of the problem, particularly since a major perpetrator ...
Politics & Policy

Latvia Divided

Riga — The cover of the British edition of Anna Arutunyan’s The Putin Mystique features a grainy, somewhat sinister image of the Russian leader, remote, mysterious, distant. In a bookstore ...
Politics & Policy

Anti-Semitism, Old and New

Twitter reached its most loathsome depths when, in late July, the hashtags “#HitlerWasRight” and “#HitlerDidNothingWrong” became global trends. It was not so long ago that Hitler was the unanimously agreed ...


Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Crazy Train

We live in an era when geek culture can feel ascendant and yet oddly sterile. The genres that were once loved mainly by fanboys, eccentrics, teenagers — science fiction, fantasy, ...


Happy Warrior

A Pot of Message

Not a week before (or maybe after) the great book editor Adam Bellow made the cover of this very pamphlet with a clarion call for conservative art, I met him ...
Politics & Policy


The Revision of Klinghoffer One of the reasons for the Jewish outcry against The Death of Klinghoffer, which was mentioned in The Week (July 21), was the original final scene, in ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ We endorse the president’s annual pilgrimage to Martha’s Vineyard. When he starts groaning about inequality, it’s impossible to hear him over the yacht engines. ‐ When the House impeached Bill ...
The Long View

Bethesda Mental-Health Clinic

THERAPIST’S NOTES: MODERATE-REPUBLICAN GROUP SESSION Session One: The group assembles in the small conference room. Although anonymity is preferred for this kind of therapy, the qualities of this particular therapy and this ...

The Cupcake Cops

What is the correct number of federal regulations concerning school bake sales? Let’s ask all the political strains in the country: Libertarian: You lost me at “federal regulations,” but I’m going ...
Politics & Policy


AN ARTIST’S DEATH For Bryant I’ve often thought of writing about you, And how your voice once filled the little square How there was very little I could do Except go to the funeral home, ...

Most Popular

Economy & Business

Who Owns FedEx?

You may have seen (or heard on a podcast) that Fred Smith so vehemently objects to the New York Times report contending that FedEx paid nothing in federal taxes that he's challenged New York Times publisher A. G. Sulzberger to a public debate and pointed out that "the New York Times paid zero federal income tax ... Read More

The Kaepernick Saga Drags On . . . off the Field

Colin Kaepernick’s workout for NFL teams in Atlanta this weekend did not run smoothly. The league announced an invitation to scouts from every team to watch Kaepernick work out and demonstrate that he was still ready to play. (As noted last week, the workout is oddly timed; the NFL season is just a bit past its ... Read More

Israel’s New Way of War

Commuters on Route 4, driving toward the Israeli coastal city of Ashdod on November 12, were shocked by an explosion, a rocket impact next to a major intersection. Had it fallen on a car or one of the many trucks plying the route, there would have been deaths, and the road would have been closed. Instead, police ... Read More