Magazine | February 9, 2015, Issue

Being Sad Together

(Carsten Koall/Getty)

I was never Charlie. I support their right to stick out their tongue and blow raspberries; I do so from a safe distance with no thought of personal risk. My workplace does not have bullet holes in the wall, and I can’t draw.

It’s a nice expression of solidarity, but when the French said, “We are all Americans” after 9/11, you suspected the sentiment would die on their lips if Bush proposed conscription of all eligible males to fight a new war. Monsieur Chirac, names and addresses, if you don’t mind. Don’t worry, we’ll fly ’em here for training. The phrase meant, “We are sympathetic to your situation and can imagine how we’d feel if it happened to us, and we plan on crafting the proper response: gathering in a public space with candles and being sad together.”

Being Sad Together is the West’s secret weapon, apparently. The bad guys are supposed to look at the masses crowded into the elegant public spaces of a European capital and feel shame, because feelings were hurt. It is more likely the terrorists look at these events and think what a few stout fellows strapped with plastic explosives and ball bearings could do.

Being Sad Together is supposed to show a nation’s indomitable will: We will not be cowed by this heinous act for at least 48 hours, after which we shall fracture along the usual lines. Two points emerged as the glow of Being Charlie faded and the candles guttered. To wit:

One: We must not give in to Islamophobia. The ever-thoughtful overclass had the usual reaction: I may not agree with your co-religionists’ stoning homosexuals and oppressing women, but I will defend to the death your right not to be criticized by people with the wrong motivations. Well, I’ll defend it right up until the break, and then we have to go to a story about how rich Mitt Romney is.

To say that Islam had any connection to the events was regarded as a mark of simplistic thinking, like blaming Germany if someone drove a Volkswagen into a crowd of people. It was the act of extremists, a word used to cleave certain groups from the ideologies they wish to advance. (“Extremists” on the right, of course, are expressing the fundamental malevolence of anyone who is insufficiently statist or secular.) And why are these “extremists” not true representatives of the cause? Because they have “twisted” it. Sometimes they espouse a “warped” view, as if interpretation of religious texts were like a record that plays another tune entirely if you store it too close to the radiator. After the next terror attack, an expert may insist that the attackers had a “folded, spindled, and mutilated” version of whatever text was their motivation.

Terrorists could guillotine cartoonists at the Place de la Bastille and commentators would insist that “these are not French values.”

Two: We must have a conversation about the limits of speech, and by “conversation” we mean “Shut up and take notes.” Liberals were keen on free speech for a while, since the boring square WASP establishment had codes and laws that stifled expression and intellectual diversity. Everything ought to be free to be ridiculed, including the ridiculers. Why, if you put Lenny Bruce on a crucifix in a jar of urine, that would be the apex of the West right there. Especially if you pulled a string and he swore! Daring.

Eventually the liberals were supplanted by the progressives, who wanted to replace the social order instead of improve it. This meant splitting people into groups that subdivided like amoebas, each with its own narrative of oppression and supply of self-replenishing rage, all united against the symbol of the human species’ most powerful foe: some married guy who likes hamburgers and drives a truck. You end up with more genders than Heinz has varieties, and each of those subcategories can also choose to be offended on the basis of a remark about ethnicity, national origin, creed, height, appearance, eyeglass strength, preference for paper over plastic, and so on.

Thus: If you decline to hire someone who is one-twentieth Samoan, has earlobes stretched to accommodate gauges the diameter of a pie plate, and wants you to install a “polygender safe space” in the form of a third restroom, you are a hater, and speaking your opinion on the matter is hate speech, inasmuch as it does not validate the other person’s self-conception.

If, on the other hand, you put up a website devoted to fat people who drive scooters around Walmart with a Jesus Is My Co-pilot bumper sticker on the back, you are hilarious.

Since the purpose of speech has become the reinforcement of whatever orthodoxy has been minted over the weekend, speech that abrades the tender gums of the vanguard must not be afforded protection, and criminal penalties are necessary to bind rude tongues.

A more apt sign would have been Je suis Charlie. Mais . . . The “but” reminds us that life is a balancing act and there are no absolutes. It is wrong to murder cartoonists, oui, but we must understand the historical cultural intersectional Orientalist nativist colonialist racist othering at work, which is why we need the State to codify expression so that all dialogue runs on rails toward the desired destination. If some of those rails take a spur to the reeducation camp and people learn that there are things that cannot be thought, let alone spoken, that’s the best kind of free speech.

Tongue-bite macht frei. Says so right over the camp gates! Must be true.

– Mr. Lileks blogs at

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

Moved to Kill

Le Parc des Buttes-Chaumont, the 60-acre public park in which the Kouachi brothers, who carried out the murderous attack on the offices of Charlie Hebdo, participated in an extensive jihadi ...
Politics & Policy

Rire in the Rear

It’s been more than two weeks since the deadly attack at the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical magazine, which is enough time to allow me to say ...
Politics & Policy

Apprenticed for Success

President Obama is committed to making community college as accessible as high school, and he is convinced that doing so will greatly improve America’s economic prospects. Specifically, he is calling ...


Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Bacon Bits

Over a recent holiday, I was rummaging through my mother’s basement. I found a book called “Notes on the Piano,” by Ernst Bacon. I had enjoyed it very much when ...
Politics & Policy

Things That Go Bump

Horror movies are rarely critical darlings, and horror movies released during the height of prestige-movie season even less. But the Australian import The Babadook has worked its way under the ...


Politics & Policy


Greyhound with Wings In your January 26 issue, Kevin D. Williamson (“Unholy Alliances”) charges airlines with a “cascade of incompetence” because he has apparently been routinely and unfairly inconvenienced by them. ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ It’s great that they’ve got a friend. Now could they have an ally? ‐ President Obama’s State of the Union address was full of liberal proposals that thankfully stand no ...

Being Sad Together

I was never Charlie. I support their right to stick out their tongue and blow raspberries; I do so from a safe distance with no thought of personal risk. My workplace ...
Politics & Policy


CRITIC The black-capped skull obliviously alert (My stare had not yet caught its yellow eye),                                        His head jerked left then right. Between each stab: the hooked neb, pricking at              An upturned breast, its puff of ...

Most Popular


George Packer Gets Mugged by Reality

Few journalists are as respected by, and respectable to, liberals as The Atlantic’s George Packer. The author of The Assassin's Gate (2005), The Unwinding (2013), and a recently published biography of Richard Holbrooke, Our Man, Packer has written for bastions of liberal thought from the New York Times Magazine ... Read More

How to Bend the News

This, from ABC, is a nice example of a news organization deliberately bending the truth in order to advance a narrative that it wishes were true but is not: Venerable gun manufacturer Colt says it will stop producing the AR-15, among other rifles, for the consumer market in the wake of many recent mass ... Read More

Trump’s Total Culture War

 Donald Trump is waging a nonstop, all-encompassing war against progressive culture, in magnitude analogous to what 19th-century Germans once called a Kulturkampf. As a result, not even former president George W. Bush has incurred the degree of hatred from the left that is now directed at Trump. For most of ... Read More