Magazine | February 23, 2015, Issue


Contraception, Continued

Robert VerBruggen agues that pro-lifers should support the promotion of contraceptives that sometimes may act as abortifacients (“On a LARC,” December 31). The death rate for unimplanted embryos is high, he points out. He then posits that if we had a moral imperative to prevent an embryo from being killed, we would have an equal duty to try to prevent its natural death. But the lengths to which we would have to go to prevent its natural death would be “absurd enough to call into serious question the premise that unimplanted embryos must be protected” at all.

No, what is absurd is the notion that, if we forgo heroic measures to save a human life from natural death, we have no moral ground to stand on when we try to save it from death by artificial means. Here VerBruggen backs into the “Oxfam argument,” formulated by Peter Singer: Every dollar you spend on a cup of coffee is a dollar you don’t send to a charity that could provide food or medicine to people for whom it is all that stands between them and death. Drink your coffee, but know that you have just killed someone. So there’s no sound reason for trying to stop Boko Haram from finishing the job for you.

As many of us know who have had to give directions to doctors reporting that an elderly family member was dying, sometimes heroic measures would not even be for the better, although the difference between when they would be and when failure to take such measures amounts to a sin of omission is never clear and certain. Always clear and certain, however, is the difference between letting someone die and hastening her death. VerBruggen’s blindness to this distinction is the weak link in his argument, which otherwise is careful, fair-minded, and free of rancor. No small achievement, given the strong emotions surrounding this issue.

Melissa Klimchock

Brecksville, Ohio

Robert VerBruggen responds: My argument is not quite the Oxfam argument: I am not saying that causing the death of X and failing to save X are morally equivalent. I am saying that if we value X and Y equally, not only will we give X and Y the same protection from artificial harm, but we will go to the same lengths (whatever those are) to save them.

That said, Ms. Klimchock is correct that sometimes it can be best, if heartbreaking, to let loved ones die of natural causes. But we allow this only in certain situations — specifically, when there is little hope that medical intervention would do more than delay the inevitable. So this analogy might apply in certain cases where a woman’s body keeps an embryo from implanting (such as when, due to a genetic disorder, her child would be destined to have a painful and very short life), but it wouldn’t hold up in others (e.g., if her body were aborting a healthy embryo, or an embryo with a genetic problem more akin to Down syndrome).

Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

A Hand Withheld

It’s rare for a president to conclude a State of the Union address with a long passage noting that his presidency “hasn’t delivered” on one of its central promises. President ...


Politics & Policy

Foreign Policy by Map

George W. Bush left office with his activist foreign policy in disrepute. Fast-forward six years: President Barack Obama has pursued, in some respects, the opposite approach, and yet he has ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Midcentury Mores

Edward Mendelson is one of our mandarin humanistic intellectuals — Lionel Trilling Professor in the Humanities at Columbia, literary executor of the estate of W. H. Auden, an expert on ...
Politics & Policy

Bloody Crossroads Redux

There have been two great political wars this Oscar season, and both have involved American liberals’ complex relationship with the movies. What makes this relationship complicated is that liberals have ...
City Desk

The City, from Afar

The road follows the right angles of everything out here, farms, townships, counties, states. On either side, fields showing stubble. Thick gnarly trees mark homesteads and cemeteries. Where the land ...


Politics & Policy


Contraception, Continued Robert VerBruggen agues that pro-lifers should support the promotion of contraceptives that sometimes may act as abortifacients (“On a LARC,” December 31). The death rate for unimplanted embryos is ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Vaccines seem to do strange things to the mind — at least for politicians. ‐ Wisconsin governor Scott Walker took an early, if narrow, lead in a poll of Iowa Republicans. ...

Lifespan Liberalism

There’s no shortage of studies that attempt to show how liberals and conservatives are different species who happen to share hominid form. Liberals are conveniently revealed by Cold Science to ...
Politics & Policy


THE MESSENGER This blind matter troubleth my wit.                                                              Everyman We waited for the messenger all night, A mixed report though certainly it shocks, When summoning what little souls we have He drums them like dumb echoes ...

Most Popular


Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More