Magazine | February 23, 2015, Issue


Contraception, Continued

Robert VerBruggen agues that pro-lifers should support the promotion of contraceptives that sometimes may act as abortifacients (“On a LARC,” December 31). The death rate for unimplanted embryos is high, he points out. He then posits that if we had a moral imperative to prevent an embryo from being killed, we would have an equal duty to try to prevent its natural death. But the lengths to which we would have to go to prevent its natural death would be “absurd enough to call into serious question the premise that unimplanted embryos must be protected” at all.

No, what is absurd is the notion that, if we forgo heroic measures to save a human life from natural death, we have no moral ground to stand on when we try to save it from death by artificial means. Here VerBruggen backs into the “Oxfam argument,” formulated by Peter Singer: Every dollar you spend on a cup of coffee is a dollar you don’t send to a charity that could provide food or medicine to people for whom it is all that stands between them and death. Drink your coffee, but know that you have just killed someone. So there’s no sound reason for trying to stop Boko Haram from finishing the job for you.

As many of us know who have had to give directions to doctors reporting that an elderly family member was dying, sometimes heroic measures would not even be for the better, although the difference between when they would be and when failure to take such measures amounts to a sin of omission is never clear and certain. Always clear and certain, however, is the difference between letting someone die and hastening her death. VerBruggen’s blindness to this distinction is the weak link in his argument, which otherwise is careful, fair-minded, and free of rancor. No small achievement, given the strong emotions surrounding this issue.

Melissa Klimchock

Brecksville, Ohio

Robert VerBruggen responds: My argument is not quite the Oxfam argument: I am not saying that causing the death of X and failing to save X are morally equivalent. I am saying that if we value X and Y equally, not only will we give X and Y the same protection from artificial harm, but we will go to the same lengths (whatever those are) to save them.

That said, Ms. Klimchock is correct that sometimes it can be best, if heartbreaking, to let loved ones die of natural causes. But we allow this only in certain situations — specifically, when there is little hope that medical intervention would do more than delay the inevitable. So this analogy might apply in certain cases where a woman’s body keeps an embryo from implanting (such as when, due to a genetic disorder, her child would be destined to have a painful and very short life), but it wouldn’t hold up in others (e.g., if her body were aborting a healthy embryo, or an embryo with a genetic problem more akin to Down syndrome).

Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

In This Issue


Politics & Policy

A Hand Withheld

It’s rare for a president to conclude a State of the Union address with a long passage noting that his presidency “hasn’t delivered” on one of its central promises. President ...


Politics & Policy

Foreign Policy by Map

George W. Bush left office with his activist foreign policy in disrepute. Fast-forward six years: President Barack Obama has pursued, in some respects, the opposite approach, and yet he has ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Bloody Crossroads Redux

There have been two great political wars this Oscar season, and both have involved American liberals’ complex relationship with the movies. What makes this relationship complicated is that liberals have ...
City Desk

The City, from Afar

The road follows the right angles of everything out here, farms, townships, counties, states. On either side, fields showing stubble. Thick gnarly trees mark homesteads and cemeteries. Where the land ...
Politics & Policy

Midcentury Mores

Edward Mendelson is one of our mandarin humanistic intellectuals — Lionel Trilling Professor in the Humanities at Columbia, literary executor of the estate of W. H. Auden, an expert on ...


Politics & Policy


THE MESSENGER This blind matter troubleth my wit.                                                              Everyman We waited for the messenger all night, A mixed report though certainly it shocks, When summoning what little souls we have He drums them like dumb echoes ...
Politics & Policy


Contraception, Continued Robert VerBruggen agues that pro-lifers should support the promotion of contraceptives that sometimes may act as abortifacients (“On a LARC,” December 31). The death rate for unimplanted embryos is ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Vaccines seem to do strange things to the mind — at least for politicians. ‐ Wisconsin governor Scott Walker took an early, if narrow, lead in a poll of Iowa Republicans. ...

Lifespan Liberalism

There’s no shortage of studies that attempt to show how liberals and conservatives are different species who happen to share hominid form. Liberals are conveniently revealed by Cold Science to ...

Most Popular

National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More

The Democrats Made Two Joe Biden Miscalculations

I think it's safe to say that there are many, many progressive Democrats who are more than a little surprised -- and a lot chagrined -- at Joe Biden's polling dominance. Look at FiveThirtyEight's polling roundup. Aside from a few high and low outliers, he leads the race by a solid 20 points (at least). Even ... Read More