Magazine | March 23, 2015, Issue

Keep Your Worlds Straight

‘My heart’s for my family, Joe. My brains and my balls are for business. And this is business. You got me?”

That line is from Cinderella Man, arguably the best boxing movie of the last 20 years. The context would take too long to explain, but suffice it to say this remark is supposed to establish its speaker — a tough-as-nails boxing promoter — as a heartless SOB. And while the character is in fact a heartless SOB, I always liked the line, because it sums up vast swathes of my political metaphysics (if you don’t think “political metaphysics” is a thing, my short reply is “Shut up”).

In the opening pages of The Fatal Conceit, Friedrich Hayek makes a simple distinction that explains what I’ve long called the fundamental category error in politics. In our local, family-centric lives, we live in what he describes as a “micro-cosmos.” The rules of the micro-cosmos are deeply informed by our instincts, our emotions, and what Hayek calls our “sentimental yearnings.” The macro-cosmos — i.e., society or civilization — is governed by a very different set of rules.

Let me put a fine point on it. Inside my family, I am a socialist and a bit of an authoritarian. I do not charge my daughter for her food, clothing, shelter, etc. My money is my wife’s money. As for the authoritarianism, my daughter doesn’t get to vote on how she spends most of her time. She has to do her homework, go to bed at a time of our choosing, eat what she’s fed, and so on. Ultimately, the family, properly conceived and run, is a benign autocracy, in which democracy is introduced slowly and piecemeal. I know of no good parents and — just as important — no good capitalists who disagree with me categorically about any of this.

Meanwhile, the farther out you get from the micro-cosmos of your formal family and your extended informal tribe of friends, the more the rules change. I will happily feed my friends and relatives free of charge, but I see no problem charging strangers for eating my chili (cheap at any price, by the way) or drinking my Scotch. My authority over my kid is near absolute, my authority over my friend’s kids is extremely limited, and my authority over a stranger’s kid is nearly nonexistent.

In the extended order of civilization, my obligations to strangers are almost wholly negative and formal. I am obliged not to steal your property or do you harm. These obligations may have support in manners and customs, but the only rules that truly bind us are legal, written down in books.

These two universes depend on each other for their survival. But if you try to run the macro-cosmos according to the rules of the micro-cosmos, or vice versa, you destroy them both. “If we were to apply the unmodified, uncurbed rules of the micro-cosmos (i.e., of the small band or troop, or of, say, our families) to the macro-cosmos (our wider civilization), as our instincts and sentimental yearnings often make us wish to do, we would destroy it,” Hayek warns. Moreover, “if we were always to apply the rules of the extended order to our more intimate groupings, we would crush them. So we must learn to live in two sorts of world at once.”

This should be obvious. A large society run like a family is in every meaningful sense tyrannical, and a family run like a democracy or a business is a hot mess. It’s no coincidence that just about every dictator you can think of cast himself as a father. Mussolini coined the term “totalitarianism” not to describe some Orwellian thugocracy, but to describe a society in which every person, or loyal Italian, is treated like family. The moral and spiritual impulse of The Communist Manifesto — “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” — is a pithy summation of how to run a loving family and a recipe for destroying a civilization. Paternalism and nanny-statism are simply softer applications of the same category error.

Hayek’s description of two worlds is simplified. The two worlds surely overlap, like two giant ovals sharing a sliver of common space in a Venn diagram. But, more important, there are more than two worlds. There are countless worlds, infinite parallel universes sharing the same space and time. We call these realms communities, voluntary associations, religious faiths, sports teams, Dungeons & Dragons clubs, military units, and a thousand thousand other “little platoons” of life.

Most of these platoons march to their own drummers, rarely if ever intruding into realms where they do not belong. But nearly all the problems in politics stem from people thinking that the rules of one platoon can be transferred to the state. Whether it is the small businessman who wants to run government “like a business,” the veteran thinking he can bring the esprit de corps (or, in Mussolini’s case, the “socialism of the trenches”) to the bureaucracy, or the pious man who wants to make the state a religious endeavor, the great and abiding source of political calamity consists in people’s refusing to keep their worlds straight. The challenge for the happy warrior of the Right, as Hayek noted, is that we are designed to want to impose the rules of the micro-cosmos on the macro-cosmos.

The mission, therefore, of the happy warrior is to take what joy he can from his platoons while telling anyone who will listen to stay in his lane.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Still Deranged

In December 2003, Dr. Charles Krauthammer diagnosed a new mental disorder, Bush Derangement Syndrome (BDS), which he defined as “the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction ...
Politics & Policy

Save the Sequester

The most unheralded achievement of the Republican Congress over the last four years has undoubtedly been the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA), which has shrunk the size of government ...

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

The Seer

One evening in February 1963, inside Firestone Library on the campus of Princeton University, the Christian Gauss Seminar in Criticism was called to order. Authors under discussion included John Dewey, ...
Politics & Policy

Soft Focus

If you think of the movies as an extended banquet served by a range of variously talented chefs — now the burgers-and-fries of a summer action movie, now the complicated ...
City Desk

Shrink Rap

City apartment buildings of a certain vintage have offices for doctors and other helping professionals that open directly onto the sidewalk, so there is no need to go through lobbies ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Sources at MSNBC say they need a conservative president in office for their ratings to recover. We’re working on it as fast as we can, guys. ‐ Israeli prime minister ...
Athwart

Stuck in Neutral

Did you hear? Scott Walker wanted to prohibit the University of Wisconsin from reporting sexual assaults to the federal government. The news ricocheted around the Internet for a few hours ...
The Long View

A Professional Correspondence

Wilson & Sterling A professional corporation  SUBJ: UNPAID INVOICES I RE: CLINTON/CLINTON CONTINUATION-OF-MARRIAGE AGREEMENT 2000, AND ADDENDA, UPDATED OCTOBER 2014, JANUARY 2015 Dear Steve: Please find attached several unpaid invoices from this office, as representatives ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

READING DOSTOEVSKY It is like loyal marriage to a brilliant sage Who beats you — an unhewn manner, rough and crude; Globs of politics and gossip, theory, glued To bloated schemes of character, page ...
Politics & Policy

Letters

A Grateful Token I am normally a gigantic fan of Kevin D. Williamson, but I must disagree with his characterization of the former NPR show Tell Me More and specifically with ...

Most Popular

White House

Rachel Maddow’s Turnberry Tale

To a certain kind of Rachel Maddow viewer, there are few more titillating preludes to a news segment than the one she delivered Monday: “If you have not seen it yet, you are going to want to sit down.” Maddow’s story began, as many of her stories do, with President Trump, this time focused on his hotel ... Read More
Elections

Thin the Herd Further, DNC

There’s an old joke often expressed well into banquets and conferences, where a speaker says, “We’re at the point where everything that needs to be said has been said, but not everyone has said it.” We’re already at that point with the Democratic primary debates. Tonight was a three-hour ordeal, and ... Read More