Magazine | June 22, 2015, Issue

Letters

Carry On?

Jerry Hendrix is not the first to disparage the Navy’s and the Congress’s decision to continue building and improving the large aircraft carrier. Critics have disparaged this decision all the way back to the Eisenhower administration, yet the construction and maintenance of large aircraft carriers in our fleet has withstood all attempts to end this vital defense program. I personally participated in several studies of the issue, and the answer was always the same. Nothing can replace aircraft carriers, with their combined high speed; unlimited endurance; simultaneous attack, strike, and self-defense capability all in one package; and service life of 50 years. It is all about mission effectiveness, and with no way to base the U.S. Air Force overseas, there is no other acceptable option. I note that Mr. Hendrix does not offer a viable alternative to the large carrier. No one has persuasively done so.

Peter M. Hekman Jr.

Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Retired)

San Diego, Calif.

Jerry Hendrix responds: It is gratifying when an individual of Vice Admiral Peter Hekman’s professional reputation takes notice of the ideas presented. I would be remiss, however, if I didn’t note that the carrier-effectiveness studies he alludes to occurred in the 1980s, well before several nations that would make themselves competitors of the United States began to invest in anti-access/area-denial technologies intended to push American carriers far from their shores and outside the range of our current carrier-based aircraft. To take Vice Admiral Hekman’s arguments in order: I would point out that the carrier’s current “high” speed of 30-plus knots is slow compared with the hypersonic ballistic missiles targeted at them. I would suggest that the air wing, which has shrunk from 80-plus aircraft in the 1980s to 60-plus aircraft today owing to increased costs and complexity, is no longer capable of simultaneous offensive-strike and self-defense operations. Last, I would respectfully invite the admiral to note that I did present two alternatives to building carriers: invest in a new air wing that could operate from beyond the range of anti-access/area-denial weapons; or abandon the construction of supercarriers and build larger, nuclear-powered, guided-missile submarines that would possess large magazines of precision-strike cruise missiles and could operate with impunity inside anti-access/area-denial environments. I thank Vice Admiral Hekman for his contribution to our national security while on active duty and for continuing this vital debate regarding the Navy’s future.

Corrections: The Week (June 1) mistakenly referred to Joshua Tree National Park as “Joshua National Park.” Happy Warrior (June 1) mistakenly identified James Truslow Adams as “James Breslow Adams.”

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

Work-Visa Wisdom

To understand the future of the immigration debate, one must first understand the H-1B visa program. Though not very well known among ordinary Americans, the program, first established in 1990, ...

Features

Politics & Policy

Indefensible Defense

Continual warfare in the Middle East, a nuclear Iran, electromagnetic-pulse weapons, emerging pathogens, and terrorism involving weapons of mass destruction variously threaten the United States, some with catastrophe on a ...

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

A Rousing Return

There are few stranger curricula vitae in the movie business than the one compiled by the Australian director George Miller. In the late Seventies and Eighties, he was the auteur ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

Carry On? Jerry Hendrix is not the first to disparage the Navy’s and the Congress’s decision to continue building and improving the large aircraft carrier. Critics have disparaged this decision all ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ The Clintons have created a shell corporation that exists solely to advance their interests and shield them from accountability. It’s called the Democratic party. ‐ Fox News, which will host ...
Athwart

Tax Tech

You’ve heard the promise of nanotechnology: Soon tiny machines will repair organs, fight disease, swarm into enemy facilities to disable electronic devices, or even build self-replicating machines on Mars to ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

THURBER’S VETERANS They brooded on the porches of Columbus Forty years after ’61, when they went South, crossed the Ohio, battled the rebels And returned. By 1900 there were Still dozens of them left in ...

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

The Second(-Class) Amendment

Editor’s Note: The following is the fourth in a series of articles in which Mr. Yoo and Mr. Phillips will lay out a course of constitutional restoration, pointing out areas where the Supreme Court has driven the Constitution off its rails and the ways the current Court can put it back on track. The first entry ... Read More
World

The Mad, Mad Meditations of Monsieur Macron

Almost everything French president Emmanuel Macron has said recently on the topic of foreign affairs, the United States, and nationalism and patriotism is silly. He implicitly rebukes Donald Trump for praising the idea of nationalism as a creed in which citizens of sovereign nations expect their leaders to put ... Read More
World

The Brexit Crisis

After what seem like years of a phony war, British and European Union negotiators finally agreed on the terms of Britain’s departure from the EU earlier this week, and Theresa May announced it in the House of Commons. The deal covers more than 500 pages of legal and bureaucratic prose, and few but the ... Read More