Magazine | February 15, 2016, Issue

Fog of War

Dominic Fumusa and John Krasinski in 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi (Paramount Pictures)

The phrase “a restrained Michael Bay movie” has the same inherent tension as, say, “a tasteful Donald Trump property” or “a platonic hug from William Jefferson Clinton.” Combine Michael Bay with a story about the most controversial overseas fiasco of the Obama era, and the possibility that America’s most shamelessly chest-pounding director might actually underplay things seems . . . well, about as plausible as the plot of the last few Transformers movies.

And yet: Here we have 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, a war movie based on a (somewhat contested, naturally) memoir by a group of CIA security contractors who were on the ground in Benghazi during the events of September 11, 2012. It is, of course, still a Michael Bay movie, which means there will be oversaturated colors, plastic sheeting billowing in slow-motion breezes, big explosions, and even a mortar’s-eye view of the assault on the CIA safe house. (The Spy Who Came In from the Cold this is not.) Yet Bay, who can usually resist anything except temptation, actually keeps his wild story on a leash.

In part, of course, he’s restrained by the obligation to keep faith with his subjects and the facts — an obligation that did not exist in, say, Bad Boys 2. But there’s room for creative license even in a “based on true events” movie, and it would have been easy for him to synthesize an al-Qaeda Big Bad for his heroes to contend with, or to play up and embellish the election-year politics (a subject of great interest, obviously, to conservatives) behind the Obama administration’s slow and somewhat strange response to the disaster.

But instead, almost everything except for the immediacy of battle is understated and oblique. Maybe Bay feared having his story swamped by a partisan debate; if so, so much the better for his movie, because it pressed him toward a very un-Bay-like artistic subtlety. There’s a passing reference to the “it was a riot about a videotape” coverage and a few scenes of Pentagon officials discussing the situation, but mostly the fact that the people in charge failed the people on the ground is made clear through the invisibility of high politics, the absence of the tense war-room scenes and presidential briefings that you get in a typical action film. For 13 hours, the world outside Benghazi disappears — and that’s the point.

Likewise the depiction of the men who stormed our embassy and besieged the CIA base: There’s one who seems like the ringleader, but we learn exactly nothing about him; again, the movie stays with the perspective of our fighting men, for whom the main thing about the situation was its surreal unknowability, the constant circulation of armed men who might be foes, or friends, or just tourists along to see a burning embassy and have a little bit of fun.

The men are played by John Krasinski, his “Jim from The Office” past buried under facial hair and muscle, plus James Badge Dale, Pablo Schreiber, and several other actors (including David Denman, Jim’s Office romantic rival!) whose names you wouldn’t recognize and whose characters blur into one another amid the firefights. They work for the film’s American bad guy, a pissy CIA station chief (David Costabile) who explains early on that their presence is unnecessary, and anyway they don’t have degrees from Yale and Harvard like his field agents so they should just keep out of everybody’s way. (I’m pretty sure no station chief has talked like this since 1955, but such are the ways of screenwriting.)

Of course he’s terribly wrong, just as he’s wrong to hold them back from rushing to the diplomatic compound when it’s first attacked, which means that when they do arrive, they’re too late to save Ambassador Christopher Stevens (Matt Letscher), and barely in time to save his contractor bodyguards. Though, in fairness, the station chief is right that his own compound could be the next target, because so it is, and half of the 13 hours is spent fending off a siege there.

That siege is the only action in the movie that’s really intelligible; the fighting at the diplomatic compound is just a chaos of men in beards with guns yelling and running, which probably captures the real feel of it but leaves the audience somewhat adrift. The personal stuff, meanwhile — Krasinski’s got a wife who doesn’t understand why he can’t come home, etc. — is just pro forma, a set of predictable beats and heartstrings that you’ve heard plucked before.

Yet the movie has an undeniable power, and its portrait of the essential futility of our Libyan intervention carries a political message that transcends the politics of Hillary. Bay-style sound and fury and all, 13 Hours fits in well alongside American Sniper and Lone Survivor — in a triptych of movies about heroes forged in wars gone sour, and soldiers worthier than the strategies for which they died.

In This Issue

Articles

Politics & Policy

The Bernie Tax

In late January, during a town-hall forum at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, Bernie Sanders, a senator from Vermont and Hillary Clinton’s chief rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, ...

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Politics & Policy

Fog of War

The phrase “a restrained Michael Bay movie” has the same inherent tension as, say, “a tasteful Donald Trump property” or “a platonic hug from William Jefferson Clinton.” Combine Michael Bay ...
Politics & Policy

A Man in Full

American administrations don’t fall silent when their president leaves office. Just the opposite: Inauguration Day for the successor is the starting gun for memoirists and journalists-turned-historians. The modern exception has been ...
Politics & Policy

The Big Liar

In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler discussed the use of a lie so “colossal” that no one would believe that someone “could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.” ...

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

A People and Their Idea Of the many fine essays in National Review’s 60th-anniversary issue (November 19, 2015), perhaps none rewards careful reading and reflection as much as John O’Sullivan’s “A ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ We appreciate the concern, Donald, and we’ll be sure to consult with you should we ever need advice about bankruptcy. ‐ If the GOP race comes down to Trump or ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

MUSK AND MYRRH Indebted to the camel covering I wore on our first evening, with the Oriental mist of Opium by Saint Laurent sprayed on my wrist, I drop the empty bottle, and slide ...

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More
U.S.

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More
Elections

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Culture

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More