Magazine | December 19, 2016, Issue

Letters

American Interests and Obligations

Mr. Nordlinger raises a legitimate question as to the extent to which Americans should be prepared to commit military resources, i.e., American lives, in furtherance of our treaty obligations (“Smaller Countries, Far Away,” October 24). Pursuant to realpolitik theory, the only time a state should commit its forces into any armed conflict is when its national interest is directly affected. That is the reason the Kremlin blinked during the Cuban missile crisis and why they never intervened directly during the Nicaraguan civil war on behalf of the Sandinistas. The Kremlin recognized correctly that these states were/are part of the American “sphere of influence” under the Monroe Doctrine, and not part of the Kremlin’s.

To be sure, in Westphalian parlance, the Baltics have always been within Russia’s “sphere of influence.” That being said, NATO and EU treaty obligations by member nations may have provided a deterrent against Russian aggression against these states. However, in an actual showdown with the Kremlin, neither the affected states nor the treaty organizations should expect American intervention if the area were ever to become “hot.” That is why the U.S. and Europe blinked when Russia annexed the Crimea. The Balkans have been in the Kremlin’s sphere for centuries. Humanitarian considerations alone should never be the determinative factor in making long-term, armed treaty commitments. Rather, the U.S. must limit the actual commitment of troops to those conflicts which directly affect America’s national interest.

David C. Frazier

Via e-mail

Jay Nordlinger responds: Three quick points. (1) I would be careful about using “sphere of influence,” the language of the Nazi–Soviet Pact. Their language need not be our language. The Baltic states, like Britain, France, and Germany, are sovereign nations. They do not belong to Moscow. (2) The North Atlantic Treaty says that an attack on one is an attack on all (Article 5). That is the heart of the treaty. If you are not going to defend certain members, you ought to expel them now. Anything else is a deception and a fraud. (3) The letter-writer brings up Crimea (though not the Donbass, which is equally relevant, at least). Ukraine, of course, is not a NATO member (sad for it).

NR Editors includes members of the editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

Politics & Policy

Letters

American Interests and Obligations Mr. Nordlinger raises a legitimate question as to the extent to which Americans should be prepared to commit military resources, i.e., American lives, in furtherance of our ...
Politics & Policy

The Week

‐ Say what you will about Twitter, it’s an improvement over Josh Earnest. ‐ President-elect Donald Trump has appointed Alabama senator Jeff Sessions to be the next attorney general. Sessions is ...
Politics & Policy

Poetry

MOVING Worn chairs with no seats cluster where A mirror gives back a dull stare At memories of other times. As leather books are losing rhymes, They tumble from a cardboard box Where fossils hide, within ...

Most Popular

Culture

Cold Brew’s Insidious Hegemony

Soon, many parts of the United States will be unbearably hot. Texans and Arizonans will be able to bake cookies on their car dashboards; the garbage on the streets of New York will be especially pungent; Washington will not only figuratively be a swamp. And all across America, coffee consumers will turn their ... Read More
National Security & Defense

The Warmonger Canard

Whatever the opposite of a rush to war is — a crawl to peace, maybe — America is in the middle of one. Since May 5, when John Bolton announced the accelerated deployment of the Abraham Lincoln carrier group to the Persian Gulf in response to intelligence of a possible Iranian attack, the press has been aflame ... Read More
Elections

The Democrats Made Two Joe Biden Miscalculations

I think it's safe to say that there are many, many progressive Democrats who are more than a little surprised -- and a lot chagrined -- at Joe Biden's polling dominance. Look at FiveThirtyEight's polling roundup. Aside from a few high and low outliers, he leads the race by a solid 20 points (at least). Even ... Read More