Magazine | September 11, 2017, Issue

Letters

Masked Media Critics

I have enjoyed  National Review for nearly four decades. Even when NR gets it wrong (in my view), they almost always do so thoughtfully and from sound conservative principles.

In the current issue, you presented me with an exception to this rule. I refer to your (admittedly mild) defense of CNN’s “doxxing” (or, rather, threat to do so) of a young “Redditor” who created and posted a video graphic of CNN being beaten up by Donald Trump. Rather than focusing on CNN’s a) inability to take a (kind of lame) joke, or b) devotion of investigatory resources to such a trivial matter when there are other obvious issues that could benefit from such “sunlight,” you said: “Why should political social-media posts be anonymous? . . . The identity of social-media pundits is a matter of public interest. Let the sun shine in.”

Here’s the problem: Anonymous speech is an integral and fundamental right tied to the right to free speech itself. If this were not inherently obvious, please note that our nation’s civil-rights jurisprudence recognizes this fact explicitly. The modern-day political climate is such that a person’s life can be destroyed for even trivial transgressions of the current liberal pieties. More grimly, leftist mobs roam the land ready to destroy property, pepper-spray the objects of their unhinged hatred, and worse. There are sound reasons to remain anonymous when being provocative, and weighing these against the ludicrous idea that some guy with a GIF editor is a “pundit” of any stripe does not exactly scream out for “sunshine.”

Of course I am aware that the First Amendment applies to state action and thus says nothing about whether CNN is permitted to deploy resources to cause someone harm as a penalty for mocking it. The “civil rights” argument is just a parallel: This is the powerless standing up to the powerful, something liberals claim to admire (until the moment it’s something that gets their own panties in a bunch, of course). Combined with CNN’s willingness to die on the barricades to protect the anonymity of someone making up fake-news allegations against Republicans, I think the real story here is the appalling hypocrisy on display.

J.D.Baldwin

Via e-mail

The Editors respond: You’re welcome, and thanks for your support. We agree that CNN deserved at least mild criticism, which is what we think we gave it. We agree as well that anonymous speech is constitutionally protected. Whether it should be celebrated is a different matter. Sometimes “the powerless” are just the cowardly.

In This Issue

Articles

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

Letters

Letters

Masked Media Critics I have enjoyed  National Review for nearly four decades. Even when NR gets it wrong (in my view), they almost always do so thoughtfully and from sound conservative ...
The Week

The Week

‐ Clearly, any sportscaster named Nathan Forrest need not apply for a job at ESPN. ‐ Steve Bannon got the axe. He had alienated many of his co-workers through infighting and ...
Poetry

Poetry

HOME When I left here I was young; I return — a target for stares. Though my temples are gray I still speak the local tongue. Kids smile at me as I pass And ask me ...

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More
Elections

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More
U.S.

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More