Magazine | September 11, 2017, Issue

Letters

Masked Media Critics

I have enjoyed  National Review for nearly four decades. Even when NR gets it wrong (in my view), they almost always do so thoughtfully and from sound conservative principles.

In the current issue, you presented me with an exception to this rule. I refer to your (admittedly mild) defense of CNN’s “doxxing” (or, rather, threat to do so) of a young “Redditor” who created and posted a video graphic of CNN being beaten up by Donald Trump. Rather than focusing on CNN’s a) inability to take a (kind of lame) joke, or b) devotion of investigatory resources to such a trivial matter when there are other obvious issues that could benefit from such “sunlight,” you said: “Why should political social-media posts be anonymous? . . . The identity of social-media pundits is a matter of public interest. Let the sun shine in.”

Here’s the problem: Anonymous speech is an integral and fundamental right tied to the right to free speech itself. If this were not inherently obvious, please note that our nation’s civil-rights jurisprudence recognizes this fact explicitly. The modern-day political climate is such that a person’s life can be destroyed for even trivial transgressions of the current liberal pieties. More grimly, leftist mobs roam the land ready to destroy property, pepper-spray the objects of their unhinged hatred, and worse. There are sound reasons to remain anonymous when being provocative, and weighing these against the ludicrous idea that some guy with a GIF editor is a “pundit” of any stripe does not exactly scream out for “sunshine.”

Of course I am aware that the First Amendment applies to state action and thus says nothing about whether CNN is permitted to deploy resources to cause someone harm as a penalty for mocking it. The “civil rights” argument is just a parallel: This is the powerless standing up to the powerful, something liberals claim to admire (until the moment it’s something that gets their own panties in a bunch, of course). Combined with CNN’s willingness to die on the barricades to protect the anonymity of someone making up fake-news allegations against Republicans, I think the real story here is the appalling hypocrisy on display.

J.D.Baldwin

Via e-mail

The Editors respond: You’re welcome, and thanks for your support. We agree that CNN deserved at least mild criticism, which is what we think we gave it. We agree as well that anonymous speech is constitutionally protected. Whether it should be celebrated is a different matter. Sometimes “the powerless” are just the cowardly.

NR Editors — NR Editors includes members of the editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

Letters

Letters

Masked Media Critics I have enjoyed  National Review for nearly four decades. Even when NR gets it wrong (in my view), they almost always do so thoughtfully and from sound conservative ...
The Week

The Week

‐ Clearly, any sportscaster named Nathan Forrest need not apply for a job at ESPN. ‐ Steve Bannon got the axe. He had alienated many of his co-workers through infighting and ...
Poetry

Poetry

HOME When I left here I was young; I return — a target for stares. Though my temples are gray I still speak the local tongue. Kids smile at me as I pass And ask me ...

Most Popular

World

Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More
Culture

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
Elections

Democrats Are Dumping Moderates

The activist base of the Democratic party is lurching left fast enough that everyone should pay attention. Activists matter because their turnout in low-turnout primaries and caucuses almost propelled leftist Bernie Sanders to victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016. Last month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unseated New ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Helsinki Discord

Donald Trump is not, and never will be, the Moscow correspondent for The Nation magazine, and he shouldn’t sound like it. The left-wing publication is prone to extend sympathetic understanding to adversaries of the United States and find some reason, any reason, to blame ourselves for their external ... Read More