Magazine | April 16, 2018, Issue

Letters

(Larryhw/Dreamstime)

THE UNAVOIDABLE SOCIAL SECURITY CRISIS

The main point of Brian Riedl’s article “The Entitlement Crisis Ignored” (March 19) seems to be that the 76.4 million Baby Boomers will cause the Social Security and Medicare funds to go bankrupt (creating an $83 trillion deficit in 30 years) when they retire. The author attempts to follow the money into the future without taking a serious look at the history of the Social Security Trust Fund.

The article states that “the existence of 74 million Baby Boomers retiring into Social Security and Medicare is an actuarial reality.” This assertion ignores the time value of contributions; the mortality rate for Boomers; the exclusion of most federal and state employees, including some teachers, firemen, policemen, etc.; the creation of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Disability Insurance Trust Fund by using the surplus in the Social Security Retirement Trust to pay for these programs; and the use of the Social Security Retirement Trust Fund surplus for the general budget.

This “borrowed” money is the major part of the $5.1 trillion intra-governmental debt that must be repaid if the Social Security Retirement Trust cannot meet its obligations. The total federal debt is greater than $13 trillion.

The bottom line of the above information is that the projected bankruptcy of Social Security is due not to Baby Boomers’ living longer and healthier lives, but rather to the government’s using our retirement fund as a general fix for other budgetary problems. Congress needs to act immediately to add the Federal Old-Age and the Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund to the general budget, return the Social Security Retirement Trust Fund to being a pure retirement program, and repay to it the $5.1 trillion loan.

Thomas Breneiser
Via email

 

Brian Riedl responds: The CBO reports that the Social Security Trust Fund has a balance just under $3 trillion — which, if it had been saved, would merely reduce Social Security’s 30-year deficit from $19 trillion to $16 trillion (plus interest). The combined 30-year Social Security and Medicare deficit would merely fall from $82 trillion to $79 trillion. The narrative does not change.

The trust fund never made much sense. Washington has no mechanism to “save” trillions of tax dollars over several decades. Buying Treasury bonds simply converted it into a $3 trillion liability for future taxpayers who will have to redeem the bonds. But the idea that truly saving this $3 trillion would have averted the difficult choices we now face is mathematically false.

Additionally, yes, these projections account for mortality rates. The massive per-person deficits in the article are expressed in net present values that account for the time value of money. And bringing more federal and state employees into a system that runs a per-person lifetime deficit would worsen future liabilities, according to the program’s actuaries.

Demographics, benefit expansions, and rising health-care costs are driving these program deficits. A $3 trillion trust fund does not change that.

The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

Most Popular

Film & TV

A Sad Finale

Spoilers Ahead. Look, I share David’s love of Game of Thrones. But I thought the finale was largely a bust, for failings David mostly acknowledges in passing (but does not allow to dampen his ardor). The problems with the finale were largely the problems of this entire season. Characters that had been ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Great Misdirection

The House Democrats are frustrated, very frustrated. They’ve gotten themselves entangled in procedural disputes with the Trump administration that no one particularly cares about and that might be litigated for a very long time. A Washington Post report over the weekend spelled out how stymied Democrats ... Read More
NR Webathon

We’ve Had Bill Barr’s Back

One of the more dismaying features of the national political debate lately is how casually and cynically Attorney General Bill Barr has been smeared. He is routinely compared to Roy Cohn on a cable-TV program that prides itself on assembling the most thoughtful and plugged-in political analysts and ... Read More