Magazine | November 12, 2018, Issue

Dinner Warriors

Senator Ted Cruz holds an event inside Schobels’ Restaurant in Columbus, Tex., September 15, 2018. (Reuters/Sergio Flores/File Photo)

History will remember 2018 as the last year Republicans got to eat at restaurants. Which is not so bad if you’re a coastal elite like me, with access to Uber Eats and a penchant for dining sur le divan. But I imagine it will take just a little bit of savor out of Mitch McConnell’s visits back home if his every attempt to eat out in Louisville ends as last week’s did, with some anonymous troglodyte dumping the senator’s rice and beans on the sidewalk and inviting him to leave the country.

I don’t want to make too much of the Resistance’s sundry efforts to encourage agents of the regime to cook at home. They’re doing these things because they can’t do anything else. Because, for the next few weeks at least, they don’t control any branch or department of government that can make a difference. And so they hector and heckle any face they recognize from an MSNBC rap sheet, and they call bicameral legislatures racist, and they dream feverish dreams of felonious frat-boy drunkards both real (que tal, Beto!) and summoned from the dark heart of the Devil’s Triangle.

I suspect that our institutions will swiftly regain their legitimacy should the Democrats retake them, and that in that event the resisters will no longer feel the need to chase Cornyns through airports as if they were Kardashians, much less to mail fake ricin to Susan Collins’s mister. (Fake anthrax was big after 9/11, like cargo shorts and Nickelback; post–Breaking Bad, ricin is having its moment.)

But since we’re not there yet, it’s worth discussing just how foolish, and how potentially catastrophic, are the politics of light assault and minor battery. This current strategy, near as I can tell, started to cohere with the “punch a Nazi” mantra that emerged around the time of the white-nationalist jamboree in Charlottesville.

I said at the time and still believe that nobody really understood how insane “Punch a Nazi” is as a piece of rhetoric, much less as a practical recommendation. Why? Well, there have been Nazis for about 100 years, and for roughly a combined 90 of them, the thing to do about Nazis was to argue with them, condemn them, or just roll your eyes and ignore them.

For those other ten years, though . . . Well, for those ten years the thing to do about Nazis was to create a fearsome and all-subsuming industrial war machine of a like never before seen on earth, and to mortgage the fate of the West in order to kill or subdue as many of those Nazis as possible.

Knuckle sandwiches never really figured into it.

It is in all times and places naïve to imagine that a politics of PG-13 violence, of half measures and threats and pushing and shoving, can be sustained and reliably controlled. As if our world were an old episode of The A-Team in which Howling Mad Murdock and B. A. Baracus hose down the bad guys with a thousand rounds of 7.62 millimeter and never so much as graze a one of them. But the particular theory on which the present set of woke palookas base their stratagem is especially dumb.

Consider, it is only if the people telling us to “punch a Nazi” are wrong about the nature and danger of their purported enemies that public shaming, threats, and occasional violence will work to subdue them. But if these people are right about their enemies, if Republican voters constitute a mass of bloodthirsty reactionaries ready to serve as foot soldiers in a violent, fascist post-America, then punching them is probably the wrong tack. After all, they’ve got all the guns.

I realize it’s very easy to get macabre or hysterical when even abutting the subject of hypothetical civil conflict. I’m not trying to suggest I find such developments likely, much less inevitable. But it does us well to remember that violence in politics is the rule, not the exception. Delicate are the levers that shame and cajole both the reactionary and the revolutionary elements at our fringes into obeying the admonishments of the greater American center (which includes, I hope, most of us, both conservative and liberal). The norms were built slowly, painstakingly, over decades and centuries, but can be undone much more quickly. Just ask Steve Scalise. Or the family of Heather Heyer, killed by a Charlottesville terrorist.

Put it another way: Everywhere, our present political moment is marked by escalation, and by the acceleration of escalation. What a strange and risky thing it is to bet that this dynamic won’t apply to our methods of public demonstration. To think both sides will in perpetuity be content to bring only fists to a fistfight.

Daniel Foster — Daniel Foster is a former news editor of National Review Online.

In This Issue



Education Section

Books, Arts & Manners


Music Too

Robert Dean Lurie reviews Anything for a Hit: An A&R Woman’s Story of Surviving the Music Industry, by Dorothy Carvello.




"I try to learn the prose of life, but my slavish reproduction of its speech is wooden..."

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review


Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More
Economy & Business

Andrew Yang, Snake Oil Salesman

Andrew Yang, the tech entrepreneur and gadfly, has definitely cleared the bar for a successful cause candidate. Not only has he exceeded expectations for his polling and fundraising, not only has he developed a cult following, not only has he got people talking about his signature idea, the universal basic ... Read More

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More

Democrats Think They Can Win without You

A  few days ago, Ericka Anderson, an old friend of National Review, popped up in the pages of the New York Times lamenting that “the Democratic presidential field neglects abundant pools of potential Democrat converts, leaving persuadable audiences — like independents and Trump-averse, anti-abortion ... Read More