Magazine | January 28, 2019, Issue

Letters

(Shobeir Ansari/Getty Images)

The Integral Church

“The genius of the American church is for tolerance and ecumenicism — the promotion of Christian unity irrespective of theological differences,” Graham Hillard remarks in his winsome essay on the great diversity in what Christian houses of worship across our land elect to call themselves (“Holy Names,” December 31, 2018).

One could argue over the question of how much theological difference churches can tolerate among themselves before the notion of their “Christian unity” loses most of its meaning, but let me remark on a phrase that Hillard uses earlier in the same sentence: “the American church.”

The universal Church, the whole body of Christians spanning the globe and reaching to its four corners, transcends boundaries between nations, so to conceive of and isolate an “American church” is, from one point of view, a failure to see that Christ’s Mystical Body is catholic, integral, and whole. Insofar as the spirit of E pluribus unum defines the universal Church as well as the United States of America, however, we might say that the two societies rhyme and echo each other in their affirmation of inclusiveness, multiculturalism, and cosmopolitanism in the best and most sincere sense.

While the cooperation among churches of many denominations (and of no denomination) is on the whole a blessing for Christians in America, let’s not forget that, besides tolerating our differences, we enjoy, as Hillard implies, a certain shared style, tone, taste, and attitude of belief. That commonality is on the whole a blessing, but we should be mindful to avoid the temptation to regard as exotic or (the irony!) backward those highly traditional Christians — Orthodox, Coptic, Syriac, etc. — who live in the Holy Land and its orbit.

Francesco A. Sangiovanni
Coral Gables, Fla.

 

When Tradition Suits You

Kevin D. Williamson’s piece “The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, After All” (December 17, 2018) reminded me of the conversion to casual dress in my successful accounting firm in New York City in the Eighties.  

On the first day of this new freedom, 90 percent of the men looked like “schlubs” (Williamson’s word, not mine), and the women were just a little better in that a large minority remained in skirts and heels. Don’t knock the striped tie and the gray flannel suit; it almost always makes a man look like a mensch.

Stanley Goldstein
Via email

In “The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, After All,” Kevin Williamson writes of “putting on an IBM-approved white shirt and tie, and going off to an office.”

While I did wear a white shirt and tie every day (even on overseas plane trips) for my first 25 years at IBM, white shirt and tie haven’t been required or even standard for a quarter century. The big changeover occurred in 1992–93.

As Williamson discussed, U.S. ties go from left shoulder across the heart, but in the ’80s European ties went from the right shoulder across.

Paul Aspinwall
Via email

NR Editors includes members of the editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Features

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

Letters

Letters

Readers respond to Kevin Williamson's thoughts on wearing a suit to work and Graham Hillard's essay on naming churches.
The Week

The Week

Planned Parenthood mistreats its pregnant employees? You should see what they do to their pregnant customers.
Poetry

Poetry

"A perfect candidate for Miss Morbidity, I often wake at 4 a.m. to hear the hiss of life evaporating from the lake..."

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Fox News Anchor Shepard Smith Resigns

Fox News Channel's chief anchor, Shepard Smith, announced on air Friday that he would be resigning from his post after 23 years with the network. “This is my last newscast here,” said Smith. “Recently, I asked the company to allow me to leave Fox News. After requesting that I stay, they obliged.” He ... Read More
NR Webathon

Don’t Let Michael Mann Succeed

I  enjoyed the running joke of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in the great Dickens novel Bleak House, back when I first read it. Little did I know that one day I and the magazine that I love would effectively be caught up in a version of that interminable case, courtesy of a litigious climate scientist with zero regard ... Read More
White House

What Is Impeachment For?

W hat is impeachment for? Seems like a simple question. Constitutionally speaking, it also appears to have a simple answer: to cite and remove from power a president guilty of wrongdoing. Aye, there’s the rub. What sort of wrongdoing warrants removal from power? I’d wager that the flames of ... Read More
Elections

Beto Proposes to Oppress Church with State

Beto O’Rourke’s presidential campaign is within the margin of error of non-existence, but in his failure he has found a purpose: expressing the Democratic id. His latest bid for left-wing love came at a CNN forum on gay rights, where he said that churches that oppose same-sex marriage should have to pay ... Read More