Magazine | September 9, 2019, Issue

Why Football Is Great

Miami Dolphins play against the Chicago Bears at Soldier Field in Chicago, Ill., August 13, 2015. (Jon Durr-USA Today Sports via Reuters)
In the hurly-burly of politics, we usually don’t stop to note our simple, unadorned love of the things that make this country so marvelous. That’s what we’ve asked our contributors to our latest special issue, "What We Love about America," to do.

The casual observer of our most popular sport, American football, may notice that it shares a lot of qualities with America. The players are incomprehensibly mammoth, overpoweringly strong, startlingly violent. The more analytical viewer will note that football shares less obvious qualities with our country as well: It’s beautiful, it’s complex, and it exemplifies the American work ethic, our genius and innovation. Football is a reminder that while sheer might was what our enemies most feared about us in World War II, it was a small coterie of physicists who sealed the final victory.

The writer Michael Lewis, whose books on baseball and football changed the way we think about both sports, and who played a lot of baseball himself as a youth, once told me that baseball players are amazingly dumb but football players are highly intelligent. They have to be; they are pieces in a risky, brutal, fast-moving chess game who act according to a rigorously designed set of human blueprints that requires them to adapt to changing circumstances in fractions of a second, based on the actions of 21 other players. Far from being a sport about brute force, football is such a cerebral affair that there is no question that the most valuable professional in the game is a coach, Bill Belichick, whose record speaks, or rather shouts, for itself. Despite managing to keep only a single player with him across his many New England Patriots teams since 2000, with most positions other than Tom Brady’s churning through many rounds of replacements, he consistently leads the best, or very nearly the best, team in the hotly competitive National Football League, whose salary-cap structure makes it impossible for any single squad to hoard a highly disproportionate amount of individual talent.

With its rednecks and its Poindexters, its outcomes equally likely to turn on the actions of a pudgy little placekicker, a fleet cornerback, or a lineman the size of Mount Rushmore, football is a simulacrum of the glorious breadth and diversity of America. Muscle and finesse each get their due. In other sports, with their fluid play, coaches are primarily concerned with whom they put on the field and only occasionally intervene with strategic choices. In football, every few seconds things stop so that each side may implement elaborately pre-choreographed tactical plans made on either side of the ball. Brain matters at least as much as brawn, just as America’s success is not just about our continental reach, our large population, or our economic preeminence.

That’s how it may look to outsiders, and how our global chorus of detractors may describe us (as they secretly long to live in Dallas or Chevy Chase). They deride us as big, sloppy golden retrievers who are forever knocking over the world’s furniture, but they know that we are more remarkable for our thought than for our power. We lead the world in everything from Nobel Prize–winning scientists to comedians. Scary strength and breathtaking ingenuity: That’s football, that’s America.

This article appears as “Football” in the September 9, 2019, print edition of National Review.

In This Issue

What We Love About America


American Men

American men — with few exceptions — treat you like a human being, in a free, natural way, because they’ve done it from the nation’s youth.

Books, Arts & Manners


Most Popular

Politics & Policy

ABC Chief Political Analyst: GOP Rep. Stefanik a ‘Perfect Example’ of the Failures of Electing Someone ‘Because They Are a Woman’

Matthew Dowd, chief political analyst for ABC News, suggested that Representative Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.) was elected due to her gender after taking issue with Stefanik's line of questioning during the first public impeachment hearing on Wednesday. “Elise Stefanik is a perfect example of why just electing ... Read More
White House

Trump vs. the ‘Policy Community’

When it comes to Russia, I am with what Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman calls the American “policy community.” Vindman, of course, is one of the House Democrats’ star impeachment witnesses. His haughtiness in proclaiming the policy community and his membership in it grates, throughout his 340-page ... Read More
Law & the Courts

DACA’s Day in Court

When President Obama unilaterally changed immigration policy after repeatedly and correctly insisting that he lacked the constitutional power to do it, he said that congressional inaction had forced his hand. In the case of his first major unilateral move — “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals,” which ... Read More
White House

Impeachment and the Broken Truce

The contradiction at the center of American politics in Anno Domini 2019 is this: The ruling class does not rule. The impeachment dog-and-pony show in Washington this week is not about how Donald Trump has comported himself as president (grotesquely) any more than early convulsions were about refreshed ... Read More

A Preposterous Review

A   Georgetown University professor named Charles King has reviewed my new book The Case for Nationalism for Foreign Affairs, and his review is a train wreck. It is worth dwelling on, not only because the review contains most of the lines of attack against my book, but because it is extraordinarily shoddy and ... Read More