Magazine May 4, 2020, Issue

Coronavirus Lockdowns: Going the Distance

A healthcare worker outside of Maimonides Medical Center during the coronavirus outbreak, Brooklyn, N.Y., April 13, 2020 (Andrew Kelly/Reuters)
The restrictions were necessary, and they still are

It is reasonable to wonder whether we have been overreacting to the pandemic. The basic rationale for social distancing — reducing the rate at which people come into contact, to arrest the spread of the coronavirus contagion — is easy to explain. But the inconstant and sometimes dishonest advice from experts, and the fuzziness of the models that seem to be influencing government decisions, has eroded confidence in the wisdom of current policies. Following the recommendations of public-health authorities, Americans have made huge sacrifices for an indefinite period of time. While a majority agrees that the current measures are necessary,

This article appears as “Going the Distance” in the May 4, 2020, print edition of National Review.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (through conference calls, social media groups, and more). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going.

If you enjoyed this article and want to see more content like this, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.


Join Now

In This Issue



Books, Arts & Manners



The Latest