In his first public statement following accusations of sexual abuse, now-disgraced movie producer Harvey Weinstein boasted of his support for supposedly righteous progressive causes. Weinstein was morally grandstanding, i.e., using moral discourse to promote his own status. And since just about everyone recognized what he was up to, Weinstein’s grandstanding was ineffective. Grandstanding isn’t always so easy to detect (if it were, no one would do it), but it’s hard to spend much time on social media and not think that there’s a lot of grandstanding going on.
In their new book, two philosophers treat moral grandstanding as a serious problem.
Something to Consider
If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?
If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.