The Supreme Court term just concluded has sparked more than the usual end-of-term debate and consternation about where the Court is now. There is and should be much of both. After all, while recent decisions included victories for religious liberty and the separation of powers, the justices also engaged in all-too-familiar activism to strike down a health-care regulation setting basic standards for abortionists, contort the text of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and stymie the Trump administration’s rollback of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Surveying the judicial landscape also requires keeping perspective: This can …
Something to Consider
If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?
If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.