Magazine November 16, 2020, Issue

Cameras Don’t Belong in the Supreme Court

(Roman Genn)
Oyez only, please

In the midst of Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Senator Chuck Grassley asked the nominee about her views on having cameras in the Supreme Court. “I would certainly keep an open mind about allowing cameras in the Supreme Court,” she answered.

This was very nearly a disqualifying remark by the otherwise exceptionally qualified nominee. Barrett surely understands that the Founders would never have approved of justices’ being subjected to the passions and pressures ignited by the vulgar transparency of mass media. When Hamilton, arguing for the creation of a supreme court in Federalist No. 81, mentions the “pestilential breath

To Read the Full Story

This article appears as “Oyez Only” in the November 16, 2020, print edition of National Review.

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content on the site including the digital magazine and archives, no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (through conference calls, social media groups, and more). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going.

If you enjoyed this article and want to see more premium content like this, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.


Become a Member

In This Issue



Books, Arts & Manners


The Week

The Week

Biden said he would appoint a bipartisan commission to study Court-packing and other changes to the courts.


The Latest