Magazine November 30, 2020, Issue

Letters

The Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., July 2, 2020 (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Camera Concurrence

David Harsanyi does a nice job a­ttacking the idea that cameras belong in the Supreme Court (“Oyez Only,” November 16), but he omits what is perhaps the most important reason for a camera-free Court: The oral arguments generally don’t matter much, and it would be a mistake to make people think otherwise. The arguments might be great theater, and most of the justices love the back-and-forth. But if lawyers haven’t put together their positions in the strongest, most coherent way in the briefs, it’s unlikely they’ll be able to salvage the situation in the courtroom. (Though often ridiculed, Justice

To Read the Full Story

Something to Consider

If you valued reading this article, please consider joining our fight by donating to our Fall Webathon. Your contribution makes it possible for us to continue our mission of speaking truth and defending conservative principles.

If you valued reading this article, please consider joining our fight by donating to our Fall Webathon.

 

Support Our Mission
NR Editors includes members of the editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

In This Issue

Articles

Books, Arts & Manners

Sections

The Week

The Week

During the campaign, Democrats used the coronavirus pandemic as a cudgel against Trump and other Republicans.

Recommended

The Latest