John Roberts is an extraordinarily risk-averse chief justice. Even were that not the case, though, the Supreme Court would resist entanglement in elections, particularly presidential elections. The justices were never going to take it upon themselves to intervene in the contest President Donald Trump has lost to President-elect Joe Biden. Nor ought they have done so, much less reverse Biden’s fairly narrow but credibly undeniable Electoral College victory.
The justices unanimously found no merit in the risible lawsuit that Texas petitioned to file against four battleground states won by Biden. In the aftermath, Trump and his more rabid supporters claimed that …
Something to Consider
If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content (including the magazine), no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (conference calls, social-media groups, etc.). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going. Consider it?
If you enjoyed this article, and were stimulated by its contents, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.