Magazine November 15, 2021, Issue

The Prisoner’s Dilemma

O.J. Simpson sits in court during the first day of jury selection for his trial at the Clark County Regional Justice Center in Las Vegas, Nev., September 8, 2008. (John Locher/Reuters)

During the O. J. Simpson trial I met one of his defense attorneys at a dinner party. I asked if he thought Simpson guilty, and he said positively not. Later, during a general discussion of the case, he said the murders were, finally, a tragedy; perhaps even more so in the case of Ron Goldman, who was an innocent victim. We all nodded.

Why did we nod? As we knew it was true. What did we all — including the lawyer — know to be true? That Nic­­ole Simpson was murdered by her ex-husband; and Ron Goldman was — not more

To Read the Full Story

Something to Consider

If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content on the site including the digital magazine and archives, no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (through conference calls, social media groups, and more). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going.

If you enjoyed this article and want to see more premium content like this, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS.


Become a Member

In This Issue



Books, Arts & Manners




It’s all familiar and boring, the recasting of an American archetype into a new mold to instruct, because they can’t come up with archetypes of their own.


The Latest