As with so much that has fallen under the 1619 Project’s increasingly expansive gaze, the problem with its meditation on the history of the right to keep and bear arms is not that it is uniformly false, but that it is overzealous.
That Americans have often ignored the black experience when evaluating the country’s past is, tragically, true. That this deficiency has applied as much to the promises made by the Constitution as to anything else is true as well. And yet, pace Nikole Hannah-Jones and co., it is not possible for the United States to remedy these inadequacies with overcorrection.
Something to Consider
If you enjoyed this article, we have a proposition for you: Join NRPLUS. Members get all of our content on the site including the digital magazine and archives, no paywalls or content meters, an advertising-minimal experience, and unique access to our writers and editors (through conference calls, social media groups, and more). And importantly, NRPLUS members help keep NR going.