Media Blog

Fact-checking George Stephanopoulos

From over on the National Review Institute’s Media Malpractice blog.  An excerpt:

First lets focus on the two facts Stephanopoulos got blatantly wrong: 1) the CBO report used a $175 figure (not $150); 2) the report looked at the economic costs of just one year (2020) not the costs “per year” as Stephanopoulos claimed. This is important because the CBO report even admits it chose the 2020 year because it expected the costs to be lower after allowing for 8 years of economic transition.

Even allowing for these two blatant factual errors, Stephanopoulos completely failed to ask any critical questions of the reports many short comings, including:

1) GDP costs ignored: Footnote four on page three of the CBO report reads: “The resource cost does not indicate the potential decrease in gross domestic product (GDP) that could result from the cap.” That’s a pretty big chunk of change to ignore. The Heritage Foundation has estimated that the GDP hit in 2020 will be $161 billion (2009 dollars). For a family of four, that is $1,870 that the CBO chose to ignore.

2) The CBO’s own numbers don’t add up: The CBO’s earlier June 19 revenue estimate projected that the allowance price — the price to emit carbon dioxide — will be $28 per ton of CO2 in 2020. Since there are 5.056 billion tons of CO2 equivalent in the cap that year, this projection implies a $141 billion gross cost; however, CBO lists the cost as $91.4 billion. That is $50 billion in costs the CBO just magically made disappear!!!!

Most Popular

World

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More